Skip to content

Texas A&M University Cyclotron Institute

The Radiation Effects Facility at the Texas A&M Cyclotron Institute is the workhorse of the four accelerators listed on the radiation testing page. Its K500 superconducting cyclotron reaches 40 MeV per nucleon, which is enough energy that a part in a ceramic package face up, or a bare flip chip, can be tested without any package modification at all [2][1]. That is why it carries more published single event effect results than any other accelerator: the JPL compendia covering 2007 to 2012 ran most of their heavy ion exposures here, in air [3][4].

The trade against Berkeley is the opposite one. Berkeley switches species in two minutes but ranges out in the package; Texas A&M penetrates the package but changes species more slowly.

ParameterValue
OperatorTexas A&M University Cyclotron Institute [2]
LocationCollege Station, Texas, United States
CommissionedNot published
TypeK500 superconducting cyclotron, heavy ion single event effects
Floor areaNot published
CapabilitiesHeavy ion beam line
Simulant or terrainNot applicable
InstrumentationNot published
Ground truthNot published. Test methods follow ASTM F1192 or JEDEC JESD57 [3][4]
Fidelity limitsMonoenergetic single-species beam; 40 MeV/u ceiling [1]
AccessUser facility. No published fee schedule or lead time
Cited byradiation testing, processors

Nothing held here is a facility description written by the operator. The envelope below is taken from two users’ facility comparisons and the campaign records from the test reports themselves, so it states what has been run rather than what can be booked [1][2].

ParameterValue
Working volumeNot published
Test article limitsNo package modification needed for ceramic face up or bare flip chip at 40 MeV/u [2]
VacuumNot required. Exposures are routinely run in air [3][4]
TemperatureSet by the user. Campaigns here report 25 C, 60 C, 85 C and 125 C part temperatures [3]
IlluminationNot applicable
SlopeNot applicable. Angled incidence is used to reach intermediate LET [4]
Gravity offloadNot applicable
InstrumentationSupplied by the user; degraders and tilt used to set intermediate LET [3][4]

Two tunes cover the useful range. At 40 MeV per nucleon, linear energy transfer runs 1 to 15 MeV-cm2/mg at 600 to 1600 micrometers of range in silicon, with no package modification needed for a ceramic package face up or a bare flip chip, though a heat spreader or heat sink must still come off [2]. At 15 to 25 MeV per nucleon, LET runs 2 to 80 MeV-cm2/mg at 125 to 250 micrometers, and the ceramic cover must be removed and a flip chip thinned [2]. The 40 MeV per nucleon maximum is stated to be adequate for practically all single event effect testing under JESD57 and ASTM F1192 [1].

Longer-range ions and angled incidence are what make the in-air configuration workable: intermediate LET is reached by tilting the part or inserting a degrader rather than by retuning the machine [4]. The angle changes the effective LET and the effective sensitive depth together, which is a source of error the compendia do not separate.

The spectrum. As at every accelerator used for this work, the beam is monoenergetic and single-species. See the radiation testing page.

A controlled sample size. This is a property of the campaigns rather than of the beam, but it governs how the results should be read: sample counts in the JPL compendia are two or three parts per entry, experimental method, bias and ion selection varied between experimenters, and many entries are one-sided bounds recording only that nothing was seen at the fluence run [3][4]. Several rows are an index into an internal test report rather than a self-contained dataset [3].

Package composition. Testing in air through an intact package means the linear energy transfer at the sensitive volume depends on what the beam crossed to get there. The consequences when that is got wrong are documented at the NSCL facility, where a plastic-packaged part gave a cross section a hundred times below the delidded one.

JPL compendium, 2007 to 2010. About forty commercial and radiation-hardened parts, heavy ion here and at Brookhaven, protons elsewhere [4]. The strongest entries are negative: the Analog Devices AD7760 24-bit ADC latched up below LET 8.3 MeV-cm2/mg at both 25 C and 85 C with a saturation cross section near 5e-4 cm2, and Samsung K9F8G08U0M and Micron MT29F8G08U0M 8 Gb NAND flash parts showed destructive high current spikes in PROGRAM and READ modes. The Vishay Siliconix SI9112DY switch mode controller shows the temperature dependence a screening campaign exists to find: latchup between LET 23 and 27 at 25 C, and between 11 and 19 at 85 C [4].

JPL compendium, 2010 to 2012. The Linear Technology LTC1419AIG 14-bit ADC, in Mars Science Laboratory flight lots, is the worked example of temperature-dependent destructive latchup found in a qualified lot: no latchup above LET 86.2 at 20 C, none above 78.0 at 40 C, and a threshold between 50 and 55 MeV-cm2/mg at 60 C, destructive once current limiting was removed [3]. From the same campaign, the Xilinx XQR5VFX130 Virtex-5QV showed no latchup to LET 145 at 125 C but a functional interrupt threshold below LET 1 at about 1e-6 cm2 per device, and Micron NAND flash at 32, 64 and 128 Gb all upset below LET 0.1. Power MOSFET entries are given in the form a designer needs, as a drain-source voltage paired with an ion and an LET: the International Rectifier JANTX2N6790 fails at 130 V under krypton at LET 37 and at 70 V under xenon at LET 50 [3]. Two Cree GaN HEMTs showed no gate rupture or burnout at all.

Power MOSFET line-to-line verification, 2010 [6] and 2014 [5]. Two campaigns treat the beam as a way to compare fabrication lines rather than part numbers. International Rectifier radiation-hardened parts from the Temecula line were immune to gate rupture and burnout within absolute maximum ratings up to about LET 37 on the IRHN57250SE, while the IRHN57133SE from the same line was degraded relative to the same part number from El Segundo, with events at lower drain-source voltage; across 50 devices every observed rupture went gate to drain [6]. The later study measured safe operating areas with the beam degraded to place the Bragg peak at the epitaxial-to-substrate interface, using silver at surface LET 51.7, holmium at 75.8 and gold at 90.4 MeV-cm2/mg [5]. Its result on the Semicoa 2N7616 is a negative one that ended a product line: a 60 V rated part responded like a 500 V rated part, and the vendor withdrew power MOSFETs from its catalog [5].

Analog transient characterization. The comparator work run here quantifies how much of a transient reaches the rail: on the commercial LM139 about 90 percent of transients saturate rail to rail below 0.7 V of differential overdrive and under 1 percent at 1 V, while the radiation-hardened Intersil IS-139ASRH eliminates output transients above 5.8 mV of differential input, tested to LET 83.9 with gold [7]. A Maxim MAX4595 analog switch gave a Weibull transient threshold of 32.1 MeV-cm2/mg and a limiting cross section of 2e-3 cm2, which the authors convert to 1.55e-4 transients per device-day in geostationary orbit and 4.80e-1 on the October 1989 worst day [8]. The second number is a rate prediction from an environment model, not a measurement.

References

  1. Guertin, S. M. (2018). Guideline for Single-Event Effect (SEE) Testing of System on a Chip (SOC) Devices . NASA, 20190002148. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{guertin2018guideline,
      title = {Guideline for Single-Event Effect (SEE) Testing of System on a Chip (SOC) Devices},
      author = {Guertin, Steven M.},
      number = {20190002148},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {2018},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190002148},
      abstract = {The use of complex single and multicore processors with significant cache memory, on-chip peripherals, memory controllers, and high speed input/output (IO) that integrate many of the parts of a traditional computer system is becoming more common in space applications. Such devices are often referred to as system on a chip devices (SOCs), even though the term is used somewhat inaccurately due to the lack of analog and mixed signal subcircuits. These devices are complex combinations of single- or multi-core processors with memory controllers, high-speed input/output (IO), and other peripheral structures that formerly would have been handled by off-chip resources. In the past the processors were tested for single event effects (SEE) separately, and the peripherals were often put into custom application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) along with other resources required by the user. Performance and cost pressures have pushed commercial devices to incorporate many of the functional blocks into a single chip, an SOC. The NASA Electronic Parts and Packaging Program (NEPP) has been examining ways to perform SEE radiation hardness assurance (RHA) testing of these processor-centric SOCs to achieve reasonable understanding of their performance in space missions.}
    }
  2. Thorbourn, D. (2013). JPL Radiation Effects Facilities . JPL Open Repository. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{thorbourn2013jpl,
      title = {JPL Radiation Effects Facilities},
      author = {Thorbourn, Dennis},
      booktitle = {JPL Open Repository},
      year = {2013},
      url = {https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:2014/42836}
    }
  3. Allen, G. R., Guertin, S. M., Scheick, L. Z., Irom, F. and Zajac, S. (2012). Compendium of recent test results of single event effects conducted by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory . IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{allen2012compendium,
      title = {Compendium of recent test results of single event effects conducted by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory},
      author = {Allen, Gregory R. and Guertin, Steven M. and Scheick, Leif Z. and Irom, Farokh and Zajac, Stephanie},
      booktitle = {IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop},
      pages = {1-10},
      publisher = {IEEE},
      year = {2012},
      doi = {10.1109/redw.2012.6353747},
      abstract = {This paper reports heavy ion, proton, and laser induced single event effects results for a variety of microelectronic devices targeted for possible use in NASA spacecrafts. The compendium covers devices tested within the years of 2010 through 2012.}
    }
  4. McClure, S. S., Allen, G. R., Irom, F., Scheick, L. Z., Adell, P. C. and Miyahira, T. F. (2010). Compendium of test results of recent single event effect tests conducted by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory . IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{mcclure2010compendium,
      title = {Compendium of test results of recent single event effect tests conducted by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory},
      author = {McClure, Steven S. and Allen, Gregory R. and Irom, Farokh and Scheick, Leif Z. and Adell, Philippe C. and Miyahira, Tetsuo F.},
      booktitle = {IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop},
      pages = {6-6},
      publisher = {IEEE},
      year = {2010},
      doi = {10.1109/redw.2010.5619495},
      abstract = {This paper reports heavy ion and proton-induced single event effect (SEE) results from recent tests for a variety of microelectronic devices. The compendium covers devices tested over the last two years by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.}
    }
  5. Scheick, L. (2014). Investigation of the Semicoa 2N7616 and 2N7425 and the Microsemi 2N7480 for single-event gate rupture and single-event burnout . Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{scheick2014investigation,
      title = {Investigation of the Semicoa 2N7616 and 2N7425 and the Microsemi 2N7480 for single-event gate rupture and single-event burnout},
      author = {Scheick, Leif},
      publisher = {JPL Open Repository},
      institution = {Jet Propulsion Laboratory},
      year = {2014},
      url = {https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:2014/44638}
    }
  6. Scheick, L. (2010). Re-verification of the IRHN57133SE and IRHN57250SE for single event gate rupture and single event burnout . International Conference on Space Operations. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{scheick2010verification,
      title = {Re-verification of the IRHN57133SE and IRHN57250SE for single event gate rupture and single event burnout},
      author = {Scheick, Leif},
      booktitle = {International Conference on Space Operations},
      publisher = {JPL Open Repository},
      year = {2010},
      url = {https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:2014/41714}
    }
  7. Bozovich, A. and Irom, F. (2017). Compendium of Single Event Transient (SET) and Total Ionizing Dose (TID) Test Results for Commonly Used Voltage Comparators . IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop (REDW). Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{bozovich2017compendium,
      title = {Compendium of Single Event Transient (SET) and Total Ionizing Dose (TID) Test Results for Commonly Used Voltage Comparators},
      author = {Bozovich, Amanda and Irom, Farokh},
      booktitle = {IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop (REDW)},
      volume = {98},
      pages = {1-21},
      publisher = {IEEE},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1109/nsrec.2017.8115430},
      abstract = {This data compendium reports single event transient (SET) and total ionizing dose (TID) test results for commonly used commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) and radiation hardened voltage comparators targeted for possible use in space-based missions. Interesting trends in the variability of the radiation performance of these devices due to differences in lot date codes, manufacturers, circuit design, and test conditions are analyzed herein.}
    }
  8. Campola, M. J., Ladbury, R., Austin, R. A., Wilcox, E. P., Pellish, J. A., Kim, H. and LaBel, K. A. (2020). Single-Event Transient Case Study for System-Level Radiation Effects Analysis . IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 20205009687. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{campola2020single,
      title = {Single-Event Transient Case Study for System-Level Radiation Effects Analysis},
      author = {Campola, Michael J. and Ladbury, R. and Austin, Rebekah A. and Wilcox, Edward P. and Pellish, Jonathan A. and Kim, H. and LaBel, Kenneth A.},
      journal = {IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science},
      volume = {68},
      number = {20205009687},
      pages = {1002-1007},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {2020},
      doi = {10.1109/tns.2021.3059174},
      abstract = {Analog single-event transient (SET) results are analyzed for two different applications within one system architecture. Application-specific analyses are presented on the MAX4595 commercial device using single-event effects criticality and goal structuring notation (GSN).}
    }