Environments
Six operating environments, each set out as the engineering literature defines it: the design values hardware is built against, the model or measurement document each value comes from, and the conditions the value was taken under. Where a quantity is a property of the destination rather than of a vehicle, it is settled on one of these pages, and the robot, software, avionics and testing pages cite it rather than restate it.
The specifications and reference models that span more than one destination are listed under environment references. What a ground rig reproduces of any of these, and where its fidelity stops, is under test facilities.
What separates them
Section titled “What separates them”- Microgravity and Orbital. Free fall is not zero acceleration. The residual field is treated as three bands separated by frequency: a quasi-steady band below 0.01 Hz, predictable anywhere in the vehicle from one measurement and the rigid-body kinematics, and vibratory content from 0.01 to 300 Hz and transient content, both of which have to be measured near the point of interest [2]. Surface exposure is set by orientation rather than by altitude, and atomic oxygen fluence on LDEF was 8.81e21 atoms/cm2 on the ram face against 1.13e3 on the wake face, through 34,000 thermal cycles in 5.8 years [3].
- Lunar Surface. The equatorial surface runs between a mean maximum of 391 K at local noon and a mean minimum of 96 K before sunrise, and polar illumination follows no latitude rule, because local topography decides it [1]. The equatorial night lasts about 350 h, and warming a 70 kg rover back to its 243 K minimum operating temperature at dawn costs 452 to 493 W h of battery energy [4], so the unpowered interval sizes the thermal and power design. Round-trip communication is short enough to drive against: VIPER was designed around 6 to 10 s [5].
- Martian Surface. Surface gravity is 3.712 m/s2, and the engineering atmosphere model is parameterized on solar longitude, latitude, longitude and local time rather than on calendar date, with dust storm intensity carried to an optical depth of 3 [6]. Round-trip light time runs 5 to 40 min over the synodic cycle, which precludes real-time monitoring and is why the operations cycle is sol-based [7].
- Small Bodies. Weight is not the dominant term in the surface mechanics. The grain radius at which van der Waals cohesion equals a grain’s own weight is 6.5e-4 m at 1 g and 0.65 m at micro-gravity, which makes the terrestrial analog a cohesive powder rather than a cohesionless soil, and net surface acceleration at Itokawa is 6 to 9 micro-G [8]. What a touch-and-go sampler meets changes character across an assumed regolith cohesive strength of about 50 to 300 Pa, between cratering with no spring engagement and a strength cone that stops the assembly at the surface [9].
- Outer Planets. Solar flux and communication rate fall as the inverse square of heliocentric distance, and round-trip light time runs to hours, so fault response cannot be supervised from Earth [10]. The two reachable surfaces are a giant planet entry corridor, where the Galileo probe met about 30 kW/cm2 of peak heating and 250 g of deceleration [11], and Titan, whose 1.35 m/s2 and dense cold atmosphere put rotorcraft flight power per unit mass at about a fortieth of the Earth value [10].
- Venus Surface. About 460 C at roughly 90 bar of supercritical carbon dioxide with a sulfuric acid aerosol above it [12], which admits two design responses: a sealed and thermally isolated volume with a fixed lifetime, or electronics that operate at ambient temperature. A packaged alumina assembly has been held at 460 C and 92 bar in a simulated Venus atmosphere for 60 Earth days [13], and a silicon carbide JFET RAM has run 10,100 h at 500 C [14].
References
- NASA. (2020). Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE), Revision G
. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{nasa2020cross, title = {Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE), Revision G}, author = {{NASA}}, institution = {NASA Marshall Space Flight Center}, year = {2020}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200000867}, abstract = {The DSNE completes environment-related specifications for architecture, system-level, and lower-tier documents by specifying the ranges of environmental conditions that must be accounted for by NASA ESD Programs. To assure clarity and consistency, and to prevent requirements documents from becoming cluttered with extensive amounts of technical material, natural environment specifications have been compiled into this document. The intent is to keep a unified specification for natural environments that each Program calls out for appropriate application.} } - McPherson, K., Kelly, E. and Keller, J. (2009). Acceleration Environment of the International Space Station
. AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 20120012936. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{mcpherson2009acceleration, title = {Acceleration Environment of the International Space Station}, author = {McPherson, Kevin and Kelly, Eric and Keller, Jennifer}, booktitle = {AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition}, number = {20120012936}, institution = {NASA}, year = {2009}, doi = {10.2514/6.2009-957}, abstract = {Measurement of the microgravity acceleration environment on the International Space Station has been accomplished by two accelerometer systems since 2001. The Microgravity Acceleration Measurement System records the quasi-steady microgravity environment, including the influences of aerodynamic drag, vehicle rotation, and venting effects. Measurement of the vibratory/transient regime, comprised of vehicle, crew, and equipment disturbances, has been accomplished by the Space Acceleration Measurement System-II. Until the arrival of the Columbus Orbital Facility and the Japanese Experiment Module, the location of these sensors, and therefore, the measurement of the microgravity acceleration environment, has been limited to within the United States Laboratory. Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency has developed a vibratory acceleration measurement system called the Microgravity Measurement Apparatus which will be deployed within the Japanese Experiment Module to make distributed measurements of the Japanese Experiment Module's vibratory acceleration environment. Two Space Acceleration Measurement System sensors from the United States Laboratory will be re-deployed to support vibratory acceleration data measurement within the Columbus Orbital Facility. The additional measurement opportunities resulting from the arrival of these new laboratories allows Principal Investigators with facilities located in these International Space Station research laboratories to obtain microgravity acceleration data in support of their sensitive experiments. The Principal Investigator Microgravity Services project, at NASA Glenn Research Center, in Cleveland, Ohio, has supported acceleration measurement systems and the microgravity scientific community through the processing, characterization, distribution, and archival of the microgravity acceleration data obtained from the International Space Station acceleration measurement systems. This paper summarizes the PIMS capabilities available to the International Space Station scientific community, introduces plans for extending microgravity analysis results to the newly arrived scientific laboratories, and provides summary information for known microgravity environment disturbers.} } - Stein, B. A. (1992). An interim overview of LDEF materials findings
. NASA, NASA-TM-107664. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{stein1992interim, title = {An interim overview of LDEF materials findings}, author = {Stein, Brad A.}, number = {NASA-TM-107664}, institution = {NASA}, year = {1992}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930009140}, abstract = {The flight and retrieval of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF) provided an opportunity for the study of the low-Earth orbit (LEO) environment and long-duration space environmental effects (SEE) on materials that is unparalleled in the history of the U.S. Space Program. The remarkable flight attitude stability of LDEF enables specific analyses of various individual and combined effects of LEO environmental parameters on identical materials on the same space vehicle. This paper provides an overview of the interim LDEF materials findings of the Principal Investigators and the Materials Special Investigation Group. In general, the LDEF data is remarkably consistent; LDEF will provide a 'benchmark' for materials design data bases for satellites in low-Earth orbit. Some materials were identified to be encouragingly resistant to LEO SEE for 5.8 years; other 'space qualified' materials displayed significant environmental degradation. Molecular contamination was widespread; LDEF offers an unprecedented opportunity to provide a unified perspective of unmanned LEO spacecraft contamination mechanisms. New material development requirements for long-term LEO missions have been identified and current ground simulation testing methods/data for new, durable materials concepts can be validated with LDEF results. LDEF findings are already being integrated into the design of Space Station Freedom.} } - Jones, H. L., Thornton, J. P., Balasubramaniam, R., Gokoglu, S. A., Sacksteder, K. R. and Whittaker, W. L. (2011). Enabling Long-Duration Lunar Equatorial Operations With Thermal Wadi Infrastructure
. AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, NASA/TM-2011-216994. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{jones2011enabling, title = {Enabling Long-Duration Lunar Equatorial Operations With Thermal Wadi Infrastructure}, author = {Jones, Heather L. and Thornton, John P. and Balasubramaniam, Ramaswamy and Gokoglu, Suleyman A. and Sacksteder, Kurt R. and Whittaker, William L.}, booktitle = {AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition}, number = {NASA/TM-2011-216994}, institution = {NASA Glenn Research Center}, year = {2011}, doi = {10.2514/6.2011-703}, abstract = {Long duration missions on the Moon’s equator must survive lunar nights. With 350 hr of cryogenic temperatures, lunar nights present a challenge to robotic survival. Insulation is imperfect, so it is not possible to passively contain enough heat to stay warm through the night. Components that enable mobility, environmental sensing and solar power generation must be exposed, and they leak heat. Small, lightweight rovers cannot store enough energy to warm components throughout the night without some external source of heat or power. Thermal wadis, however, can act as external heat sources to keep robots warm through the lunar night. Electrical power can also be provided to rovers during the night from batteries stored in the ground beside wadis. Buried batteries can be warmed by the wadi’s heat. Results from analysis of the interaction between a rover and a wadi are presented. A detailed three-dimensional (3D) thermal model and an easily configurable two-dimensional (2D) thermal model are used for analysis.} } - Mirmalek, Z., Lim, D. S., Colaprete, A. and Lees, D. (2025). Lunar science real-time operations and mission systems integration definitions and practices from NASA's VIPER mission
. International Conference on Space Operations, SpaceOps-2025, ID 294. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{mirmalek2025lunar, title = {Lunar science real-time operations and mission systems integration definitions and practices from NASA's VIPER mission}, author = {Mirmalek, Zara and Lim, Darlene S. and Colaprete, Anthony and Lees, David}, booktitle = {International Conference on Space Operations}, number = {SpaceOps-2025, ID 294}, institution = {NASA}, address = {Montreal, Canada}, year = {2025}, doi = {10.82217/spaceops2025_294}, abstract = {Mission system design for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER) mission began with focusing on building key components including a solar-powered rover and the ground data system for operating it on the Moon for 100-Earth-days. The VIPER mission would be designed to support teams of people on Earth and a robot on the Moon carrying out a scientifically planned search for water ice, over a distance of 20 km. Initially, within the mission system design the involvement of VIPER’s science team (VST) was noted as “the science customer” - a designation and acknowledgement of a key workgroup in the mission. The VST’s work support needs, for a science work system, however, had not yet been defined by the VST in terms of systems and architecture. As the VST’s Science Operations team conducted research to develop a science operations system and architecture for VIPER’s science mission activities they found the science system needs for supporting real-time lunar science were greater than that which was designated in the mission system for the science customer. They decided to focus on developing the science operations system via ongoing integration rather than establishing a separate science component that later would be adjoined to the mission system. VIPER Science Operations enacted integration as an ongoing work practice; integration was a carried out as a regular activity that required schedule and agenda planning to be carried out on a daily and weekly basis, and adjustments in accordance with other workgroups’ activities. The work of integrating requires including and maintaining a greater number of considerations in the short-term work plan such as scheduling and product considerations (e.g., goals, interface features, networks, workspace build, mission simulations) and human relationships. In the long-term, ongoing integration approach can yield benefits that include fewer system conflicts, which can be avoided by learning of conflicts during development when they can be addressed. In addition to lunar science operations development and training with the VIPER Science team, integration included working with VIPER Mission system’s operating software workgroup, as well as the workgroups for rover drivers, planning and timelining, mission systems engineering, testing and training, and mission workspace preparation. This paper shows the work of integration as a process during the pre- surface operations development stage and highlights some examples of mission enhancing decisions that resulted from this integrated approach.} } - Justh, H. L., Burns, K. L., Dutta, S. and Hoffman, J. (2024). Mars Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Mars-GRAM) 2024: User Guide
. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{nasa2024mars, title = {Mars Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Mars-GRAM) 2024: User Guide}, author = {Justh, Hilary L. and Burns, K. L. and Dutta, Soumyo and Hoffman, J.}, institution = {NASA Marshall Space Flight Center}, year = {2024}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240012934}, abstract = {This Technical Memorandum (TM) presents the Mars Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Mars-GRAM) 2024 and its updated features. Mars-GRAM is an engineering-oriented atmospheric model that estimates mean values and statistical variations of atmospheric properties for Mars. This TM summarizes the atmospheric data model in Mars-GRAM and provides a guide for the user to obtain, set up, and run the code in various configurations. Additional details regarding the Mars-GRAM input and output files and how to interpret Mars-GRAM results are also provided.} } - Gildner, M., Allbaugh, A. R., Mishkin, A., Algermissen, S., Kirk, M. V., Ellison, D., Bridge, C., Stough, T. and Stroupe, A. (2021). Commanding Curiosity from the Couch: MSL Remote Operations, Challenges, and Path Ahead
. IEEE Aerospace Conference. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{gildner2021commanding, title = {Commanding Curiosity from the Couch: MSL Remote Operations, Challenges, and Path Ahead}, author = {Gildner, Matthew and Allbaugh, Alicia R and Mishkin, Andrew and Algermissen, Stirling and Kirk, Matthew Van and Ellison, Douglas and Bridge, Carrie and Stough, Timothy and Stroupe, Ashley}, booktitle = {IEEE Aerospace Conference}, pages = {1-19}, publisher = {IEEE}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1109/aero50100.2021.9438370}, abstract = {This paper describes how the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) project prepared for and successfully began Curiosity rover Mars operations from their homes in response to the COVID-19 work-from-home orders. In a very short period, the team developed procedures and executed a remote operations readiness test in parallel with the team's support for nominal operations. Continuing regular rover operations with an entirely remote team had not previously been considered feasible due to a variety of factors. These included both the human factors, such as multiple concurrent person-to-person interactions of the uplink planning team, as well as technical factors, such as reliance on powerful workstations dedicated to graphically intensive software tools used for planning. The test was conducted on March 12, 2020, with both the downlink and uplink teams successfully simulating a near full planning day. The JPL administration announced the transition to mandatory telework on Monday, March 16. MSL stood down the uplink planning originally scheduled for the next day while downlink continued monitoring the rover. Full operations then resumed per schedule with nearly the entire operations team teleworking on Friday, March 20, during which the team planned rover activities for three Martian days (sols). These activities included the successful drilling of the “Edinburgh” rock target, a highly complex robotic arm contact science activity. As of October 1, 2020, the Mars Science Laboratory mission operations team has conducted 88 remote tactical uplink shifts for a total of 190 sols of planned rover activity, which accounts for more than 6% of the mission to date. In this period the rover has completed four drilling campaigns and driven over 1160 meters towards its next major science target - a sulfate bearing geologic unit at the foot of Mount Sharp. Success has not been without its challenges. Many of these have been addressed while others will remain in some form until the team can safely return to JPL, which in turn is the largest challenge for the future.} } - Scheeres, D. J., Hartzell, C. M., Sánchez, P. and Swift, M. (2010). Scaling forces to asteroid surfaces: The role of cohesion
. Icarus. Source
BibTeX
@article{scheeres2010scaling, title = {Scaling forces to asteroid surfaces: The role of cohesion}, author = {Scheeres, Daniel J. and Hartzell, C. M. and Sánchez, Paul and Swift, M.}, journal = {Icarus}, volume = {210}, pages = {968--984}, year = {2010}, doi = {10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.009} } - Scheeres, D. J. and Sánchez, P. (2018). Implications of cohesive strength in asteroid interiors and surfaces and its measurement
. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 25. Source
BibTeX
@article{scheeres2018implications, title = {Implications of cohesive strength in asteroid interiors and surfaces and its measurement}, author = {Scheeres, Daniel J. and Sánchez, Paul}, journal = {Progress in Earth and Planetary Science}, volume = {5}, number = {25}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.1186/s40645-018-0182-9}, abstract = {Recent observations and theory have indicated that rubble pile asteroids may have a small, but finite, level of tensile strength, allowing them to spin above their spin deformation limit as defined in Holsapple (Icarus 205:430–442, 2010). In Sánchez and Scheeres (Meteorit Planet Sci 49:788–811, 2014), a theory for how such strength could be present in rubble pile asteroids was presented, relying on weak van der Waals forces between fine particulate material in asteroid regolith and in their interiors. The implications of this theory are evaluated and related to the surface strength of regolith and global strength of a rubble pile body. Proposed techniques to measure the strength of regolith using cratering theory are reviewed, as are constraints placed on the global strength of rubble pile asteroids from astronomical observations. Specific examples applied to the Hayabusa2 cratering experiment at its target asteroid are given.} } - Lorenz, R. D., Turtle, E. P., Barnes, J. W., Trainer, M. G., Adams, D. S., Hibbard, K. E., Sheldon, C. Z., Zacny, K., Peplowski, P. N., Lawrence, D. J., Ravine, M. A., McGee, T. G., Sotzen, K. S., MacKenzie, S. M., Langelaan, J. W., Schmitz, S., Wolfarth, L. S. and Bedini, P. D. (2018). Dragonfly: A Rotorcraft Lander Concept for Scientific Exploration at Titan
. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 3. Source
BibTeX
@article{lorenz2018dragonfly, title = {Dragonfly: A Rotorcraft Lander Concept for Scientific Exploration at Titan}, author = {Lorenz, Ralph D. and Turtle, Elizabeth P. and Barnes, Jason W. and Trainer, Melissa G. and Adams, Douglas S. and Hibbard, Kenneth E. and Sheldon, Colin Z. and Zacny, Kris and Peplowski, Patrick N. and Lawrence, David J. and Ravine, Michael A. and McGee, Timothy G. and Sotzen, Kristin S. and MacKenzie, Shannon M. and Langelaan, Jack W. and Schmitz, Sven and Wolfarth, Larry S. and Bedini, Peter D.}, journal = {Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest}, volume = {34}, number = {3}, pages = {374--387}, year = {2018}, url = {https://dragonfly.jhuapl.edu/News-and-Resources/docs/34_03-Lorenz.pdf} } - Milos, F. S. (1997). Galileo Probe Heat Shield Ablation Experiment
. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 6. Source
BibTeX
@article{milos1997galileo, title = {Galileo Probe Heat Shield Ablation Experiment}, author = {Milos, Frank S.}, journal = {Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets}, volume = {34}, number = {6}, pages = {705--713}, year = {1997}, doi = {10.2514/2.3293}, abstract = {Covers advancements in spacecraft and tactical and strategic missile systems, including subsystem design and application, mission design and analysis, materials and structures, developments in space sciences, space processing and manufacturing, space operations, and applications of space technologies to other fields.} } - Justh, H. L., Dwyer Cianciolo, A. M. and Hoffman, J. (2021). Venus Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Venus-GRAM): User Guide
. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA/TM-20210022168. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{justh2021venus, title = {Venus Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Venus-GRAM): User Guide}, author = {Justh, Hilary L. and Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia M. and Hoffman, J.}, number = {NASA/TM-20210022168}, institution = {NASA Marshall Space Flight Center}, year = {2021}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210022168}, abstract = {This Technical Memorandum (TM) presents the Venus Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Venus-GRAM) and the updated features of the GRAMs. Venus-GRAM is an engineering-oriented atmospheric model that estimates mean values and statistical variations of atmospheric properties for Venus. This TM summarizes the atmospheric data model in Venus-GRAM and provides a guide for the user to obtain, set up, and run the code in various configurations. Additional details regarding the Venus-GRAM input and output files and how to interpret Venus-GRAM results are also provided.} } - Chen, L.-Y., Neudeck, P. G., Meredith, R. D., Lukco, D., Spry, D. J., Nakley, L. M., Phillips, K. G., Beheim, G. M. and Hunter, G. W. (2018). Sixty Earth-Days Test of a Prototype Pt/HTCC Alumina Package in Simulated Venus Environment
. Additional Conferences, 20180006758. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{chen2018sixty, title = {Sixty Earth-Days Test of a Prototype Pt/HTCC Alumina Package in Simulated Venus Environment}, author = {Chen, Liang-Yu and Neudeck, Philip G. and Meredith, Roger D. and Lukco, Dorothy and Spry, David J. and Nakley, Leah M. and Phillips, Kyle G. and Beheim, Glenn M. and Hunter, Gary W.}, booktitle = {Additional Conferences}, volume = {2018}, number = {20180006758}, pages = {000015-000021}, institution = {NASA}, address = {Albuquerque, New Mexico}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.4071/2380-4491-2018-hiten-0000015}, abstract = {Abstract This paper presents experimental results of a prototype high temperature co-fired ceramic (HTCC) package with Au/Pt metallization in a three-phase harsh environment test that culminated with 60-day demonstration in simulated Venus surface environment of 465 °C with corrosive atmosphere at 90 bar pressure. The prototype package is based on previously developed and reported HTCC package successfully tested with multiple analog and digital silicon carbide (SiC) high temperatures semiconductor integrated circuits (ICs) at NASA Glenn Research Center in 500 °C Earth air ambient for over ten thousands hours, and short-term tested at temperatures above 800 °C. The three-phase harsh environment test started with 48 hours in 465 °C Earth air, followed by 48 hours in 465 °C nitrogen at 90 bar pressure and 1400 hours in simulated Venus surface environment of 465 °C with corrosive atmosphere at 90 bar. Initial analytical results of the package materials and surfaces after exposure to Venus environment are discussed to assess the stability of the packaging materials in the tested environments. The test in simulated Venus environment was implemented in the NASA Glenn Extreme Environment Rig (GEER). The results of this study suggest that an effective encapsulation of areas of surface metallization and vicinities may help to improve electrical performance of a HTCC alumina packaging system in Venus environment.} } - Neudeck, P. G., Spry, D. J., Krasowski, M. J., Prokop, N. F., Beheim, G. M., Chen, L.-Y. and Chang, C. W. (2018). Yearlong 500 C Operational Demonstration of Up-scaled 4H-SiC JFET Integrated Circuits
. Additional Conferences. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{neudeck2018yearlong, title = {Yearlong 500 C Operational Demonstration of Up-scaled 4H-SiC JFET Integrated Circuits}, author = {Neudeck, Philip G. and Spry, David J. and Krasowski, Michael J. and Prokop, Norman F. and Beheim, Glenn M. and Chen, Liang-Yu and Chang, Carl W.}, booktitle = {Additional Conferences}, volume = {2018}, pages = {000071-000078}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.4071/2380-4491-2018-hiten-000071}, abstract = {Abstract This work describes recent progress in the design, processing, and testing of significantly up-scaled 500 °C durable 4H-SiC junction field effect transistor (JFET) integrated circuit (IC) technology with two-level interconnect undergoing development at NASA Glenn Research Center. For the first time, stable electrical operation of semiconductor ICs for over one year at 500 °C in air atmosphere is reported. These groundbreaking durability results were attained on two-level interconnect JFET demonstration ICs with 175 or more transistors on each chip. This corresponds to a more than 7-fold increase in 500 °C-durable circuit complexity from the 24 transistor ring oscillator ICs reported at HiTEC 2016 [1]. These results advance the technology foundation for realizing long-term durable 500 °C ICs with increased functional capability for combustion engine sensing and control, planetary exploration, deep-well drilling monitoring, and other harsh-environment applications.} }