Skip to content

MMX Rover (IDEFIX)

The IDEFIX flight model on its handling frame before delivery, remove-before-flight tags still fitted. Two of the four wheels are visible: an open spoked rim carrying petal-shaped grousers, sized for a body whose weight on Phobos is about 0.1 N, so traction comes from grouser engagement with the regolith rather than from normal load. The red panels are protective covers over the stowed solar generator DLR. CC BY 3.0.

IDEFIX is a four-wheeled rover built by DLR and CNES to be delivered to Phobos by the JAXA Martian Moons eXploration spacecraft. It is released during an MMX landing rehearsal from about 40 m altitude, falls to the surface, probably bounces several times, and then uprights itself with an autonomous sequence of leg deployments before deploying its solar generator [1]. The whole Separation, Landing, Uprighting and Deployment sequence begins before separation and runs autonomously; the landing point is known only to an uncertainty ellipse of up to 100 m until the first post-uprighting image is compared against orbiter terrain models [5].

ParameterValue
Rover flight segment mass, including units on the spacecraft27.5 kg
Rover mass23.47 kg
Scientific payload mass2.44 kg
Locomotion subsystem mass4.52 kg
Solar generator mass3.76 kg
Battery mass1.43 kg
Nominal driving velocity1 mm/s
Weight on Phobosabout 0.1 N

Source: [1].

ParameterValueSource
CarrierJAXA Martian Moons eXploration spacecraft[1]
TargetPhobos[1]
Release altitudeabout 40 m, during an MMX landing rehearsal[1]
Landing point knowledge before the first post-uprighting imageuncertainty ellipse of up to 100 m[5]
Traverse requirement100 m[1]
Nominal surface operationat least 100 Earth days [1], [5]; three months on the DLR program page [10][1], [5], [10]
Launch2026, H-3 from Tanegashima Space Center[10]
Landing on Phobosearly 2029[10]
Sample return to Earth2031[10]
Integration statusfinal work and tests at the CNES site in Toulouse; carbon structure delivered to CNES in November 2022[10]
QuantityValue
Dimensions26.06 x 22.80 x 18.28 km
Mean radius10.993 km
Mass1.065e16 +/- 0.015e16 kg
Mean bulk density1.860 +/- 0.013 g/cm3
Surface gravity0.0030 to 0.0068 m/s2
Escape velocity11.39 m/s
Rotation period7 h 39 min 19.47 s
Equatorial rotation velocity2.97 m/s
Orbital semi-major axis9375 km, 2.76 Mars radii
Orbital eccentricity0.015
Geometric albedo0.071
Infrared emissivity0.98
Thermal inertia20 to 70 J/m2/K/s^0.5
Surface temperature60 to 330 K within 60 degrees of the equator
Surface slopes0 to 40 degrees, mostly below 40 with many below 10

Source: [1], [2].

Rows with no marker are from [2].

Regolith particle size is inferred rather than measured. Estimated average particle diameter is below 2 mm, and below 1 mm if thermal inertia is 55 J/m2/K/s^0.5, with surface porosity of 30 to 60 percent and most probably above 53 percent [2]. Fine material below about 300 micrometer may be depleted. The internal friction angle of the particles is estimated at 30 to 50 degrees [2]. A three-layer regolith model is used for design: micrometer-sized fluffy dust from 0 to 3 cm, high-porosity debris from 10 cm to 3 m, and denser regolith below about 10 m. The mission assumes a particle size range of 30 micrometer to 10 cm for wheel interaction analysis [3], against boulders of 2 to 85 m seen from flyby imaging.

The gravity regime is the design problem. At 0.003 to 0.007 m/s2 the rover weighs about 0.1 N, so available traction is correspondingly tiny [1]. Cohesion between grains exceeds their weight over the relevant particle size range at this acceleration [8], and the bulk cohesive strength of a regolith of this grain size is of order tens of pascals [9], which is the same order as the loads a wheel can apply.

The UTPS family is the Phobos simulant used for testing [2].

SimulantPoured bulk densityPoured porosityAngle of reposeTapped densityTapped porosity
UTPS-S10.82 g/cm368.7 percent55.1 degrees1.51 g/cm342.4 percent
UTPS-S21.33 g/cm353.5 percent48.4 degrees1.44 g/cm349.7 percent
UTPS-S31.67 g/cm341 percent47.1 degrees1.85 g/cm334.6 percent

All values from [2]. The Tagish Lake based variant UTPS-TB has a grain density of 2.8 to 3.0 g/cm3, a bulk density of 1.68 +/- 0.03 g/cm3 and a microporosity of 40.8 +/- 1.0 percent. A factor of two in poured bulk density across three simulants of the same family is the measure of how loosely the target is constrained.

Reduced-gravity penetrometry into Phobos simulant on parabolic flight gives the complementary data: penetration at 3 to 35 mm/s, 42 mm of penetration at 3 mm/s, Froude numbers of 0.18 to 1.8, and the finding that cohesive material returns reaction forces of nearly the same magnitude as at 1 g [6]. Sampler penetration modeling at the Phobos value of 5.7e-3 m/s2 uses friction angles of 20, 42 and 60 degrees against cohesion of 0, 0.5 and 1 kPa [7].

The locomotion subsystem comprises four individually actuated wheels of about 200 mm diameter, each mounted on an individually actuated leg 275 mm long, giving skid steering [1]. The sequence for unfolding, standing up, driving, aligning and lowering the rover was designed specifically for Phobos rather than adapted from a planetary rover [3]. It has four modes [1]:

ModeFunction
DrivingFour wheels differentially driven with legs stationary, for straight lines, curves and point turns
AlignmentLegs and wheels moved to change chassis height and orientation with minimal change in position, for aiming instruments or pointing the array at the Sun
UprightingLeg angles adjusted while wheels rotate in coordination so the wheels keep rolling on the surface
PassthroughManual commanding of each wheel and leg individually

Source: [1].

IDEFIX autonomous uprighting sequence

The open-loop uprighting sequence, frame by frame: the legs unfold and refold repeatedly, each repetition having a high probability of rotating the rover from whatever face it came to rest on onto its belly. No sensor determines the starting orientation, which is why the sequence is identical from every attitude. Source: [1]. CC BY 4.0.

Uprighting is a universal open-loop sequence of repeated leg unfolding and refolding, each repetition having a high probability of rotating the rover from any face onto its belly [1]. It requires no sensor to determine the rover’s current orientation. The rover’s final attitude after the bounces cannot be predicted, and the WheelCams are activated during the uprighting sequence rather than after it [3], [5].

The nominal 1 mm/s driving velocity is not a mechanism limit [1]. The locomotion system can go faster; the cap exists because at Phobos gravity an abrupt stop risks toppling the rover about its front axis [1]. Reduced-gravity penetrometry gives the reason the wheel loads cannot simply be scaled down with gravity: in cohesive material the reaction force is nearly the same magnitude as at 1 g [6]. Entrapment is handled by using the individually actuated legs and wheels to shift weight distribution and lift single wheels out of the regolith, and particularly soft regolith is crossed by inching rather than driving [1].

Wheel sinkage is the quantity the WheelCams exist to measure. Sinkage has a static component from compaction under load and a dynamic component from shearing as the wheel rotates, and its extent is set directly by the shear strength and cohesion of the surface material [3]. Greater sinkage increases the wheel-regolith contact area and is read together with slip ratio as an indicator of trafficability.

Landing dynamics are instrumented. Four three-axis ADXL356 MEMS accelerometers log the impact and bounce sequence to internal memory, with an abridged version relayed in real time to the ascending mothership to confirm a successful landing [1]. Two Silicon Sensing CRM200 gyroscopes give roll and pitch rates during descent and detect excessive roll or pitch while driving. Together with spacecraft imagery these reconstruct the landing and bouncing trajectory and constrain the mechanical properties of the landing site.

The solar generator has four panels, three deployable and one fixed to the top panel, with a total area of 0.36 m2, feeding one rechargeable battery through a power control and distribution unit [1]. An umbilical from the MMX spacecraft supplies power and communication lines during the cruise, and heats the rover. At a geometric albedo of 0.071 the surface returns very little light to the array, so the available flux is essentially direct solar [2].

Operations are power critical. After an energy-consuming activity such as driving, several Phobos days are needed for recharging, where one Phobos day is 7.65 h [1]. An attitude control sub-unit called SKA reorients the rover around Phobos noon to point the cells at the Sun, which forces locomotion activities into the Phobos morning.

Thermal design is insulation rather than active control: the internal module is inside multilayer insulation and every thermal leak between the units, the chassis and the environment has to be minimized to keep heater power down [1]. Operating modes on the surface are chosen to hold instruments and electronics within thermal limits and minimize heating power. Thermal and power requirements constrain the landing site latitude. The limits themselves are instrument-specific: the miniRAD electronics box is qualified only from -45 to +60 C while its sensor head runs from -140 to +50 C, so the two sit in different thermal zones [4].

Communication after separation is via an S-band radio to the MMX spacecraft; there is no direct Earth link [1].

LinkRateSource
Telecommand32 kbit/s[1]
Telemetry64 kbit/s or 512 kbit/s[1]

The operational cadence is one Earth-to-spacecraft pass per Earth day and two spacecraft-to-rover contacts per Earth day [1]. During the descent itself only a compressed subset of data reaches the spacecraft before it loses contact with the rover [5]. Because all commanding and telemetry relay through the mothership, a ground loop that depends on the full downlink of a previously executed activity takes at least 2 Earth days [1].

InstrumentMassKey parametersSource
NavCams (stereo pair)0.4 kg122 degree diagonal field of view, 1 mrad angular resolution, 400 to 800 nm, focal length about 7.9 mm, 68 mm stereo baseline, depth of field 35 cm to infinity[1], [5]
WheelCams0.22 kg2048 x 2048 pixels at 5.5 um pitch, 32.5 degree field, about 100 um per pixel at 30 cm, depth of field +/- 5 cm, white and 590 / 720 / 880 nm LEDs[1], [3]
RAX (Raman spectrometer)1.51 kg532 nm laser at 20 mW, 50 um spot, 535 to 680 nm, Raman shift 90 to 4000 cm-1 at about 10 cm-1 resolution, 80 mm autofocus working range[1]
miniRAD (radiometer)0.34 kgSix channels over 4.7 to 100 um, 32 degree FWHM field, 25 to 150 cm observation distance[1], [4]

miniRAD splits into a 96 g sensor head, 209 g of electronics and a 27 g calibration target [4]. Its channel set is a 4.7 to 6.2 um short-wave channel, narrow bandpasses at 8.2, 8.9 and 9.5 um of 0.5 um width, and long-wave channels at 14 to 25 um and 15 to 100 um. Calibration covers 100 to 330 K, with a temperature uncertainty of 1 K above 270 K rising to 5 K on the long-wave channels at 100 K, and a noise-equivalent temperature difference of 6 mK at 270 K on the bandpasses and 40 mK at 100 K on the long-pass channels [4]. Sampling is 0.06 Hz in science and calibration mode and 1 Hz in fast science mode. Power draw is 0.45 W standby, 0.55 W diagnostic, 1.0 to 1.4 W science and 4.0 W calibration [4]. Sensor head operating range is -140 to +50 C, electronics -45 to +60 C, and the calibration target -155 to +60 C.

RAX is placed on the underside of the rover looking down at the ground [1]. Above 18 C it triggers thermal heat switches.

The thermal measurement is sensitive to a very thin layer. The diurnal thermal skin depth is close to 5 mm in regolith and of order a few centimeters in boulders, so miniRAD can detect a dust layer of 50 micrometer on regolith and 500 micrometer on a boulder [4].

The NavCams support digital terrain models at about 1 mm ground sampling over the first meter with an accuracy of a few millimeters at 1 m, which is also how the rover is localized by comparison against the orbiter’s high-resolution terrain models [5].

Driving is commanded day by day from the ground within the MMX planning cycle [1]. Two experimental autonomous navigation systems are being developed in parallel, one by DLR and one by CNES, intended to extend the driving range beyond what daily manual commanding reaches [1], [5]. Autonomous guidance uses the navigation camera stereo pair [5].

Commissioning of the locomotion system is treated as a distinct mission phase, because the mechanical behavior of natural regolith at Phobos gravity is uncertain and wheel-soil traction must be extremely small at a rover weight near 0.1 N [1]. The total distance the rover will actually cover is stated as difficult to estimate; 100 m is the engineering requirement, not a prediction.

Trafficability in a blocky terrain is an open concern for both landing and driving, which is part of why the wheel-facing cameras are carried at all [3].

Spacecraft activities constrain the rover. During MMX sampling and landing the spacecraft has limited ability to communicate with the rover, so the rover is placed in a safe configuration performing no critical operations and guaranteed not to become power critical for several days without contact [1]. Landing, sampling and especially departure eject substantial surface material, so the rover will if possible move away from the spacecraft landing site to keep dust off its solar cells, and the landing site selection and separation maneuver are designed to limit that exposure.

No rover-specific radiation design data is published. Phobos has no atmosphere or magnetic field of its own; the cruise environment is the interplanetary galactic cosmic ray field taken from the Badhwar-O’Neill model [11]. Published dust environment figures for the surface exist but are quoted in the source without a resolvable exponent, so they are not reproduced here.

IDEFIX is the first attempt at wheeled locomotion on a body in the milligravity regime, and the sensorless uprighting sequence is the direct design consequence of a landing whose final attitude cannot be predicted or measured [1]. The accelerometer and gyroscope record of the landing and bounce is intended as a measurement of the surface, not only as engineering telemetry, which places it in the same category as the OSIRIS-REx contact record as a source of in-situ small body geotechnical data. The wheel sinkage and slip record is the second such product, and is the first direct measurement of wheel-regolith interaction at milligravity rather than an inference from a simulant test at 1 g [3]. Everything the design was sized against on the Phobos side, particle size, porosity and friction angle, is at present inferred from thermal inertia and simulant work rather than measured [2].

References

  1. Ulamec, S., Michel, P., Murdoch, N., Vernazza, P., Grott, M., Knollenberg, J., Schröder, S., Hübers, H.-W., Cho, Y., Prieto-Ballesteros, O., Biele, J., Tardivel, S., Buse, F., Miyamoto, H., Krause, C., May, D., Delmas, C., Baroukh, J., Mary, S. and Grebenstein, M. (2025). Science operations of IDEFIX, the MMX Phobos rover. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 97. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{ulamec2025science,
      title = {Science operations of IDEFIX, the MMX Phobos rover},
      author = {Ulamec, Stephan and Michel, Patrick and Murdoch, N. and Vernazza, P. and Grott, M. and Knollenberg, J. and Schröder, S. and Hübers, H.-W. and Cho, Y. and Prieto-Ballesteros, O. and Biele, J. and Tardivel, S. and Buse, F. and Miyamoto, H. and Krause, C. and May, D. and Delmas, C. and Baroukh, J. and Mary, S. and Grebenstein, M.},
      journal = {Progress in Earth and Planetary Science},
      volume = {12},
      number = {97},
      year = {2025},
      doi = {10.1186/s40645-025-00771-x}
    }
  2. Miyamoto, H., Niihara, T., Wada, K., Ogawa, K., Senshu, H., Michel, P., Kikuchi, H., Hemmi, R., Nakamura, T., Nakamura, A. M., Hirata, N., Sasaki, S., Asphaug, E., Britt, D. T., Abell, P. A., Ballouz, R.-L., Banouin, O. S., Baresi, N., Barucci, M. A., Biele, J., Grott, M., Hino, H., Hong, P. K., Imada, T., Kameda, S., Kobayashi, M., Libourel, G., Mogi, K., Murdoch, N., Nishio, Y., Okamoto, S., Ota, Y., Otsuki, M., Otto, K. A., Sakatani, N., Shimizu, Y., Takemura, T., Terada, N., Tsukamoto, M., Usui, T. and Willner, K. (2021). Surface environment of Phobos and Phobos simulant UTPS. Earth, Planets and Space, 214. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{miyamoto2021surface,
      title = {Surface environment of Phobos and Phobos simulant UTPS},
      author = {Miyamoto, Hideaki and Niihara, Takafumi and Wada, Koji and Ogawa, Kazunori and Senshu, Hiroki and Michel, Patrick and Kikuchi, Hiroshi and Hemmi, Ryodo and Nakamura, Tomoki and Nakamura, Akiko M. and Hirata, Naoyuki and Sasaki, Sho and Asphaug, Erik and Britt, Daniel T. and Abell, Paul A. and Ballouz, Ronald-Louis and Banouin, Olivier S. and Baresi, Nicola and Barucci, Maria A. and Biele, Jens and Grott, Matthias and Hino, Hideitsu and Hong, Peng K. and Imada, Takane and Kameda, Shingo and Kobayashi, Makito and Libourel, Guy and Mogi, Katsuro and Murdoch, Naomi and Nishio, Yuki and Okamoto, Shogo and Ota, Yuichiro and Otsuki, Masatsugu and Otto, Katharina A. and Sakatani, Naoya and Shimizu, Yuta and Takemura, Tomohiro and Terada, Naoki and Tsukamoto, Masafumi and Usui, Tomohiro and Willner, Konrad},
      journal = {Earth, Planets and Space},
      volume = {73},
      number = {214},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.1186/s40623-021-01406-3}
    }
  3. Murdoch, N., Lalucaa, V., Sunday, C., Tardivel, S., Bertrand, J., Théret, N., Vivet, D., Amsili, A., Robin, C., Delton, P., Duchene, A., Douaglin, Q., Maillard, A., Virmontois, C., Vernazza, P., Jorda, L., Groussin, O., Miyamoto, H., Vincent, J.-B., Flahaut, J., Biele, J., Barnouin, O., Hartzell, C., Buse, F., Barthelmes, S., Ulamec, S., Michel, P. and Baroukh, J. (2025). The WheelCams on the IDEFIX rover. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 54. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{murdoch2025wheelcams,
      title = {The WheelCams on the IDEFIX rover},
      author = {Murdoch, Naomi and Lalucaa, Valérian and Sunday, Cecily and Tardivel, Simon and Bertrand, Jean and Théret, Nicolas and Vivet, Damien and Amsili, Alice and Robin, Colas and Delton, Panos and Duchene, Alexia and Douaglin, Quentin and Maillard, Antoine and Virmontois, Cedric and Vernazza, Pierre and Jorda, Laurent and Groussin, Olivier and Miyamoto, Hideaki and Vincent, Jean-Baptiste and Flahaut, Jessica and Biele, Jens and Barnouin, Olivier and Hartzell, Christine and Buse, Fabien and Barthelmes, Stefan and Ulamec, Stephan and Michel, Patrick and Baroukh, Julien},
      journal = {Progress in Earth and Planetary Science},
      volume = {12},
      number = {54},
      year = {2025},
      doi = {10.1186/s40645-025-00725-3}
    }
  4. Knollenberg, J., Grott, M., Hamm, M., Ihring, A., Ziese, R. and Biele, J. (2025). The miniRAD instrument for the MMX IDEFIX rover. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 53. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{knollenberg2025minirad,
      title = {The miniRAD instrument for the MMX IDEFIX rover},
      author = {Knollenberg, J. and Grott, M. and Hamm, M. and Ihring, A. and Ziese, R. and Biele, J.},
      journal = {Progress in Earth and Planetary Science},
      volume = {12},
      number = {53},
      year = {2025},
      doi = {10.1186/s40645-025-00717-3}
    }
  5. Vernazza, P., Jorda, L., Tardivel, S., Baroukh, J., Groussin, O., Pimorin, C., Poulain, A., Chabaud, P.-Y., Robert, E., Bertrand, J., Lalucaa, V., Remetean, E., Théret, N., Virmontois, C., Murdoch, N., Le Mouélic, S., Beck, P., Rüsch, O., Flahaut, J., Charnoz, S., Lasue, J., Barucci, M.-A., Doressoundiram, A., Michel, P. and Ulamec, S. (2025). Surface science on Phobos with the navigation cameras of the MMX IDEFIX rover. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 46. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{vernazza2025surface,
      title = {Surface science on Phobos with the navigation cameras of the MMX IDEFIX rover},
      author = {Vernazza, Pierre and Jorda, Laurent and Tardivel, Simon and Baroukh, Julien and Groussin, Olivier and Pimorin, Celia and Poulain, Axel and Chabaud, Pierre-Yves and Robert, Emilie and Bertrand, Jean and Lalucaa, Valerian and Remetean, Emile and Théret, Nicolas and Virmontois, Cedric and Murdoch, Naomi and Le Mouélic, Stéphane and Beck, Pierre and Rüsch, Ottaviano and Flahaut, Jessica and Charnoz, Sebastien and Lasue, Jeremie and Barucci, Maria-Antonietta and Doressoundiram, Alain and Michel, Patrick and Ulamec, Stephan},
      journal = {Progress in Earth and Planetary Science},
      volume = {12},
      number = {46},
      year = {2025},
      doi = {10.1186/s40645-025-00708-4}
    }
  6. Smyth-Moore, A., Borg, J., Soria-Salinas, Á., Murdoch, N., Kato, H., Miyamoto, H., Usui, T., Kaufmann, E., Granvik, M. and Hagermann, A. (2025). Microgravity penetrometry flight campaign in support of MMX sampler science exploitation. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 38. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{smythmoore2025microgravity,
      title = {Microgravity penetrometry flight campaign in support of MMX sampler science exploitation},
      author = {Smyth-Moore, Alexander and Borg, Johan and Soria-Salinas, \'Alvaro and Murdoch, Naomi and Kato, Hiroki and Miyamoto, Hideaki and Usui, Tomohiro and Kaufmann, Erika and Granvik, Mikael and Hagermann, Axel},
      journal = {Progress in Earth and Planetary Science},
      volume = {12},
      number = {38},
      year = {2025},
      doi = {10.1186/s40645-025-00704-8}
    }
  7. Schäfer, C. M., Scherrer, S., Buchwald, R., Maindl, T. I., Speith, R. and Kley, W. (2017). Numerical simulations of regolith sampling processes. Planetary and Space Science. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{schafer2017numerical,
      title = {Numerical simulations of regolith sampling processes},
      author = {Sch{\"a}fer, Christoph M. and Scherrer, Samuel and Buchwald, Robert and Maindl, Thomas I. and Speith, Roland and Kley, Wilhelm},
      journal = {Planetary and Space Science},
      volume = {141},
      pages = {35--44},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1016/j.pss.2017.04.015},
      url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00893}
    }
  8. Scheeres, D. J., Hartzell, C. M., Sánchez, P. and Swift, M. (2010). Scaling forces to asteroid surfaces: The role of cohesion. Icarus. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{scheeres2010scaling,
      title = {Scaling forces to asteroid surfaces: The role of cohesion},
      author = {Scheeres, D. J. and Hartzell, C. M. and S\'anchez, P. and Swift, M.},
      journal = {Icarus},
      volume = {210},
      pages = {968--984},
      year = {2010},
      doi = {10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.009}
    }
  9. Scheeres, D. J. and Sánchez, P. (2018). Implications of cohesive strength in asteroid interiors and surfaces and its measurement. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 25. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{scheeres2018implications,
      title = {Implications of cohesive strength in asteroid interiors and surfaces and its measurement},
      author = {Scheeres, Daniel J. and S\'anchez, Paul},
      journal = {Progress in Earth and Planetary Science},
      volume = {5},
      number = {25},
      year = {2018},
      doi = {10.1186/s40645-018-0182-9}
    }
  10. Michel, P., Ulamec, S., Böttger, U., Grott, M., Murdoch, N., Vernazza, P., Sunday, C., Zhang, Y., Valette, R., Castellani, R., Biele, J., Tardivel, S., Groussin, O., Jorda, L. and Knollenberg, J. (2022). The MMX rover: performing in situ surface investigations on Phobos. Earth, Planets and Space, 2. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{michel2022mmx,
      author = {Michel, Patrick and Ulamec, Stephan and B{\"o}ttger, Ute and Grott, Matthias and Murdoch, Naomi and Vernazza, Pierre and Sunday, Cecily and Zhang, Yun and Valette, Rudy and Castellani, Romain and Biele, Jens and Tardivel, Simon and Groussin, Olivier and Jorda, Laurent and Knollenberg, J{\"o}rg},
      title = {The {MMX} rover: performing in situ surface investigations on {Phobos}},
      journal = {Earth, Planets and Space},
      volume = {74},
      number = {2},
      year = {2022},
      doi = {10.1186/s40623-021-01464-7},
      url = {https://earth-planets-space.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40623-021-01464-7}
    }
  11. (2026). DLR: Martian Moons eXploration rover IDEFIX. dlr.de/en/research-and-transfer/projects-and-missions/mmx (accessed 2026-09-02) archived copy
    BibTeX
    @misc{dlrmartian,
      title = {DLR: Martian Moons eXploration rover IDEFIX},
      howpublished = {\url{https://www.dlr.de/en/research-and-transfer/projects-and-missions/mmx}},
      organization = {dlr.de},
      year = {2026},
      urldate = {2026-09-02}
    }

Further reading

  • O'Neill, P. M., Golge, S. and Slaba, T. C. (2014). Implementing the Badhwar-O'Neill Galactic Cosmic Ray Model for Spacecraft Analysis. NASA. Source