Skip to content

Connectors, Seals and Materials

Seals, barriers, fasteners and structural materials selected by flown and qualified planetary robotics programs, with the dust and vacuum test results published for them.

The strongest result in this class is negative. IPEx removed the electrical charging connector entirely and charges through an antenna carried on the radiator cover, because a dust-tolerant electrical connector is the component most likely to fail in a regolith environment [2]. Where a rotating interface cannot be removed, the IPEx answer is a three-stage stack: labyrinth outermost, then felt, then a PTFE lip seal [1][2].

Seals, fasteners and materials selected and flown

Section titled “Seals, fasteners and materials selected and flown”
PartManufacturerUsed bySource
Nomex felt sealNot namedipex (all drive actuators)[1][2]
Spring-loaded PTFE rotary sealNot namedspirit, opportunity (arm)[3]
Aeroflex rotary shaft sealAeroflexspirit, opportunity (steering)[3]
Beta clothNot namedBoots and bellows over mechanisms[3]
Chromel-R fabric, RTV-630 facingNot namedApollo suit boots and gloves[4]
Velcro hook and pile on KaptonNot namedApollo 17 receiver thermal bag[5]
A286 screws, Nitronic 60 insertsNot namedipex[1][2]
Zirconia and silicon nitride ballsNot namedLunar mechanisms, candidate[3]
Sapphire window, fused silica opticsOptimaxperseverance (SHERLOC ACI)[7]
  • Nomex felt seal, vendor not named. Three-stage rotary dust seal: a labyrinth path, then felt, then a PTFE lip. Ratings: Layered outward from a PTFE lip seal to a Nomex felt seal to a labyrinth path [1][2]. Qualification: Tested in dirty vacuum under the TC4 test-as-you-fly profile with a dust cup conveying simulant over the rotating output. A single felt seal gave sufficient protection in the worst case, with minimal dust found beyond it. A large quantity of dust penetrated the labyrinth stage, attributed to the test submerging the lower section of the running actuator rather than to the seal design [1]. Measured seal drag torque across the Generation 1 campaign peaked at 0.03 N m, under one percent of the overall load [2].
  • Spring-loaded PTFE rotary seal, vendor not named: a spring-energized lip seal for outer diameters above about 1.5 inch, flown on the MER Instrument Deployment Device [3]. Ratings: Flight heritage on the MER arm; tested in vacuum in the presence of lunar simulant [3]. Qualification: Durable and effective in simulant vacuum testing, and scored joint highest of three seal types in a weighted trade study, Table 3. Long-term stability under lunar temperature extremes and radiation is recorded as unresolved [3].
  • Aeroflex rotary shaft seal, Aeroflex. Dry running rotary shaft seal, on the MER wheel steering actuators. Ratings: Simple mechanism with no lubricant [3]. Qualification: Successfully limited regolith ingress in vacuum simulant testing. Requires high machining tolerances, is susceptible to misalignment during installation, and is affected by vibration; lunar material selection is unresolved [3].
  • Beta cloth, vendor not named. Fiberglass fabric used as a flexible dust barrier in boots and bellows over lunar mechanisms. Ratings: Compared against thermoplastic polyurethane and Tyvek for the same application, scored on mass per square meter, complexity, TRL, manufacturability into a boot, durability and 40 to 400 K temperature sensitivity [3]. Qualification: Scored highest of the three barrier materials in the weighted trade, the gap driven by higher TRL and by durability and effectiveness. The result is a trade score, Table 5, not a life test [3].
  • Chromel-R fabric, RTV-630 facing, vendor not named. Abrasion-resistant metallic fabric in the extravehicular mobility unit boots and gloves. Ratings: Woven into the boots and gloves; RTV-630 used for soles and finger tips [4]. Qualification: Introduced in flight because the super beta cloth outer covering was not abrasion resistant against sharp lunar rock. The rest of the dust control scheme did not work: a single nylon bristle brush removed coarse grains but not fines and may have transferred nearly as much dust as it removed, wrist bearings and rotational connectors had only fabric covers that were not effective, and from Apollo 15 Velcro-attached dust covers were added to the front connectors [4].
  • Velcro hook and pile on Kapton, vendor not named. Fastener system bonded with polyurethane FR-127 A and B, on the Apollo 17 lunar surface receiver thermal bag. Ratings: Pile pads bonded to the Kapton bag, hook straps bonded to the Kapton flaps [5]. Qualification: Flight failure. Both flap bonds had failed before the end of the first EVA, letting dust settle on the mirror surface under both flaps. The pads came away leaving no adhesive trace on the Kapton. FR-127 A and B remains recommended for bonding Velcro to Kapton; the failure was attributed to bonding preparation and procedure, with mixing, timing and freedom from surface contamination named as the controlled parameters [5].
  • A286 screws, Nitronic 60 inserts, vendor not named: a standard 4-40 fastener set with locking helical inserts [2]. Ratings: Used throughout the vehicle for commonality, with 2-56 fasteners as a deliberate exception at the harmonic drive flex cup and wave generator. Qualification: Carried through the KSC actuator qualification campaign, including the accelerated life test that ran the wheel actuator to 6,547,036 input revolutions and repeated disassembly and inspection between runs [1][2].
  • Zirconia and silicon nitride balls, vendor not named. Ceramic rolling elements as a dust-tolerance strategy, a candidate for lunar surface mechanisms. Ratings: Very high hardness against abrasion, and both run dry, which removes lubricant from the failure set in lunar vacuum [3]. Qualification: Scored highest of four dust-tolerant bearing types in a weighted trade, with a clear gap to stainless steel and to hybrid superconducting magnetic bearings, driven by durability and dry running. The result is a trade score, Table 9 [3].
  • Sapphire window, fused silica optics, optics by Optimax. Fluorescence-free optical train of uncoated UV-grade fused silica and magnesium fluoride behind a sapphire window. Ratings: Four-element telecentric objective behind a sapphire window, all elements uncoated, made from UV-grade fused silica or fluorescence-free magnesium fluoride; the camera lens group moves on a linear rail [7]. Qualification: Materials were chosen to be fluorescence-free because the instrument measures deep ultraviolet fluorescence and Raman scatter, so any optic that fluoresces becomes a background signal. The dust cover is solid aluminum and opaque, carrying the internal AlGaN calibration target on its inner face [7].

RASSOR 2.0 records a manufacturing result rather than a materials one [6]. The shoulder actuator housings were 3D printed in titanium with extra material left on the bearing, stator, rotor and sealing faces for later machining. With no printed datum to work from, the machinist had to build fixtures for each of six parts and assume an axis of revolution in each, to bring the motor, bearings and harmonic drive coaxial [6]. Where a printed housing carries a bearing bore and a seal face, the print does not remove the machining operation.

Seal and surface materials with a measured or normative limit

Section titled “Seal and surface materials with a measured or normative limit”

The rows below are the level at which a seal, a connector or a surface coating stops meeting its requirement. Solder joints, package interconnects, platings and the printed wiring they sit on are on Packaging and Board Reliability.

PartManufacturerUsed bySource
Sample tube seal SN282Not namedperseverance[8]
TR01447 Kapton with KevlarNot namedviper (dust sock)[9]
Cr3C2-NiCr HVOF coatingNot namedLangley Taber abrasion[10]
M83513-03-E03C connectorGlenairastrobee payload interface[11]
  • Sample tube seal SN282. Ratings: one tube, measured by static-mode noble gas mass spectrometry over accumulations of 23 to 29 hours [8]. Qualification: helium leak rate 1.7e-15 scc/s at -51 C and 1.4e-13 scc/s at +42 C, over eight average run temperatures on that one tube, rising with temperature and linear against inverse absolute temperature [8]. The demonstrated range is -51 to +42 C and nothing outside it.
  • TR01447 Kapton with Kevlar, heavyweight Kevlar reinforcement, selected as the VIPER dust sock baseline. Ratings: Martindale abrasion testing at the Johnson Space Center softgoods laboratory [9]. Qualification: no increase in air permeation, 7.8 percent thickness loss and 1.2 percent weight loss at 100 percent completion of the run [9]. The candidate MO01503 reached 200 percent completion but lost 23.1 percent of thickness and 3.9 percent of weight, and DE355 lost 49.5 and 21.7 percent, so the selection traded abrasion endurance for retained thickness.
  • Cr3C2-NiCr HVOF coating on aluminum 6061, as deposited and unpolished [10]. Ratings: ASTM D4060 Taber abrasion with CS-17 wheels, eddy current thickness at 400, 1200 and 5000 cycles. Qualification: just under 2 micrometers of thickness lost after 5000 cycles, the best of seven commercial coatings, with mass loss too small across every composition to compute a wear index [10]. Tribaloy T-800 and Cr3C2 coatings lost under 5 micrometers, an air plasma sprayed alumina-titania coating lost over 20 and also had the highest as-processed roughness at 1.55 micrometers Ra, and an air plasma sprayed yttria-stabilized zirconia coating gave a wear index of 9.20 mg per 1000 cycles, roughly twice the alumina rate. Under a 20 kHz sonic wand screen with LHS-1D milled highland simulant, the alumina, Cr3C2-NiCr and Tribaloy T-800 coatings retained the least residual dust of the seven, judged semi-quantitatively from optical images [10].
  • M83513-03-E03C connector, Glenair. Thirty-one pin blind mate connector carrying the Astrobee payload interface. Ratings: 14.4 V at a 3 A limit, with three USB 2.0 data pinouts routed to different processors [11]. Qualification: no environmental or life result is published for it.

Aluminum against itself is the worst uncoated cold-welding pair measured in the corpus, at 1775 mN of adhesion under vacuum impact, above titanium [12]; the full set of contact-pair results is on Bearings and Lubrication.

References

  1. Schuler, J. M., Smith, J. D., Nick, A. J., Buckles, B. C., Dyas, J. E., Ortega, V. V., Cloud, J. M., Dokos, A. G., Zhang, E. L., Wang, J. J., Baron, M. A., Muller, T. J., Clark, C. J. and Howe, M. W. (2024). ISRU Pilot Excavator (IPEx) Technology Readiness Level 5 Design Overview. NASA, 20240008162. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{schuler2024isru,
      title = {ISRU Pilot Excavator (IPEx) Technology Readiness Level 5 Design Overview},
      author = {Schuler, Jason M. and Smith, Jonathan D. and Nick, Andrew J. and Buckles, Bradley C. and Dyas, Jeffrey E. and Ortega, Victoria V. and Cloud, Joseph M. and Dokos, Adam G. and Zhang, Elizabeth L. and Wang, Jerry J. and Baron, Michael A. and Muller, Thomas J. and Clark, Casey J. and Howe, Musashi W.},
      year = {2024},
      institution = {NASA},
      number = {20240008162},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240008162},
      booktitle = {AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024},
      doi = {10.2514/6.2024-4890}
    }
  2. Clark, C. J., Smith, J. D., Nick, A. J., Ortega, V. V., Schuler, J. M., Dyas, J. E. and Lahl, J. (2025). Design and Testing of TRL5 IPEx Actuators. NASA, 20250000003. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{clark2025design,
      title = {Design and Testing of TRL5 IPEx Actuators},
      author = {Clark, Casey J. and Smith, Jonathan Drew and Nick, Andrew J. and Ortega, Victoria V. and Schuler, Jason M. and Dyas, Jeffrey E. and Lahl, John},
      year = {2025},
      institution = {NASA},
      number = {20250000003},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250000003},
      booktitle = {IEEE Aerospace Conference},
      address = {Big Sky, MT}
    }
  3. Cannon, K. M., Dreyer, C. B., Sowers, G. F., Schmit, J., Nguyen, T., Sanny, K. and Schertz, J. (2022). Working with lunar surface materials: Review and analysis of dust mitigation and regolith conveyance technologies. Acta Astronautica. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{cannon2022working,
      title = {Working with lunar surface materials: Review and analysis of dust mitigation and regolith conveyance technologies},
      author = {Cannon, Kevin M. and Dreyer, Christopher B. and Sowers, George F. and Schmit, John and Nguyen, Thao and Sanny, Keoni and Schertz, Joshua},
      journal = {Acta Astronautica},
      volume = {196},
      pages = {259--274},
      year = {2022},
      doi = {10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.04.037}
    }
  4. Gaier, J. R. (2005). The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions. NASA Glenn Research Center, NASA/TM-2005-213610, 20050160460. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{gaier2005effects,
      title = {The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions},
      author = {Gaier, James R.},
      year = {2005},
      institution = {NASA Glenn Research Center},
      number = {NASA/TM-2005-213610, 20050160460},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20050160460}
    }
  5. Anon. (1973). Apollo 17 Mission Report. NASA, NASA-TM-. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{anon1973apollo,
      title = {Apollo 17 Mission Report},
      author = {Anon},
      year = {1973},
      institution = {NASA},
      number = {NASA-TM-},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730015117}
    }
  6. Mueller, R. P., Smith, J. D., Schuler, J. M., Nick, A. J., Gelino, N. J., Leucht, K. W., Townsend, I. I. and Dokos, A. G. (2021). Design of an Excavation Robot: Regolith Advanced Surface Systems Operations Robot (RASSOR) 2.0. NASA, 20210011366. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{mueller2021design,
      title = {Design of an Excavation Robot: Regolith Advanced Surface Systems Operations Robot (RASSOR) 2.0},
      author = {Mueller, Robert P. and Smith, Jonathan D. and Schuler, Jason M. and Nick, Andrew J. and Gelino, Nathan J. and Leucht, Kurt W. and Townsend, Ivan I. and Dokos, Adam G.},
      year = {2021},
      institution = {NASA},
      number = {20210011366},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210011366},
      booktitle = {Earth and Space 2016},
      doi = {10.1061/9780784479971.018},
      pages = {163-174}
    }
  7. Bhartia, R., Beegle, L. W., DeFlores, L., Abbey, W., Razzell Hollis, J., Uckert, K., Monacelli, B., Edgett, K. S., Kennedy, M. R., Sylvia, M., Aldrich, D., Anderson, M., Asher, S. A., Bailey, Z., Boyd, K., Burton, A. S., Caffrey, M., Calaway, M. J., Calvet, R., Cameron, B., Caplinger, M. A., Carrier, B. L., Chen, N., Chen, A., Clark, M. J., Clegg, S., Conrad, P. G., Cooper, M., Davis, K. N., Ehlmann, B., Facto, L., Fries, M. D., Garrison, D. H., Gasway, D., Ghaemi, F. T., Graff, T. G., Hand, K. P., Harris, C., Hein, J. D., Heinz, N., Herzog, H., Hochberg, E., Houck, A., Hug, W. F., Jensen, E. H., Kah, L. C., Kennedy, J., Krylo, R., Lam, J., Lindeman, M., McGlown, J., Michel, J., Miller, E., Mills, Z., Minitti, M. E., Mok, F., Moore, J., Nealson, K. H., Nelson, A., Newell, R., Nixon, B. E., Nordman, D. A., Nuding, D., Orellana, S., Pauken, M., Peterson, G., Pollock, R., Quinn, H., Quinto, C., Ravine, M. A., Reid, R. D., Riendeau, J., Ross, A. J., Sackos, J., Schaffner, J. A., Schwochert, M., Shelton, M. O., Simon, R., Smith, C. L., Sobron, P., Steadman, K., Steele, A., Thiessen, D., Tran, V. D., Tsai, T., Tuite, M., Tung, E., Wehbe, R., Weinberg, R., Weiner, R. H., Wiens, R. C., Williford, K., Wollonciej, C., Wu, Y.-H., Yingst, R. A. and Zan, J. (2021). Perseverance's Scanning Habitable Environments with Raman and Luminescence for Organics and Chemicals (SHERLOC) Investigation. Space Science Reviews, 58. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{bhartia2021perseverance,
      title = {Perseverance's Scanning Habitable Environments with Raman and Luminescence for Organics and Chemicals (SHERLOC) Investigation},
      author = {Bhartia, Rohit and Beegle, Luther W. and DeFlores, Lauren and Abbey, William and Razzell Hollis, Joseph and Uckert, Kyle and Monacelli, Brian and Edgett, Kenneth S. and Kennedy, Megan R. and Sylvia, Margarite and Aldrich, David and Anderson, Mark and Asher, Sanford A. and Bailey, Zachary and Boyd, Kerry and Burton, Aaron S. and Caffrey, Michael and Calaway, Michael J. and Calvet, Robert and Cameron, Bruce and Caplinger, Michael A. and Carrier, Brandi L. and Chen, Nataly and Chen, Amy and Clark, Matthew J. and Clegg, Samuel and Conrad, Pamela G. and Cooper, Moogega and Davis, Kristine N. and Ehlmann, Bethany and Facto, Linda and Fries, Marc D. and Garrison, Dan H. and Gasway, Denine and Ghaemi, F. Tony and Graff, Trevor G. and Hand, Kevin P. and Harris, Cathleen and Hein, Jeffrey D. and Heinz, Nicholas and Herzog, Harrison and Hochberg, Eric and Houck, Andrew and Hug, William F. and Jensen, Elsa H. and Kah, Linda C. and Kennedy, John and Krylo, Robert and Lam, Johnathan and Lindeman, Mark and McGlown, Justin and Michel, John and Miller, Ed and Mills, Zachary and Minitti, Michelle E. and Mok, Fai and Moore, James and Nealson, Kenneth H. and Nelson, Anthony and Newell, Raymond and Nixon, Brian E. and Nordman, Daniel A. and Nuding, Danielle and Orellana, Sonny and Pauken, Michael and Peterson, Glen and Pollock, Randy and Quinn, Heather and Quinto, Claire and Ravine, Michael A. and Reid, Ray D. and Riendeau, Joe and Ross, Amy J. and Sackos, Joshua and Schaffner, Jacob A. and Schwochert, Mark and Shelton, Molly O and Simon, Rufus and Smith, Caroline L. and Sobron, Pablo and Steadman, Kimberly and Steele, Andrew and Thiessen, Dave and Tran, Vinh D. and Tsai, Tony and Tuite, Michael and Tung, Eric and Wehbe, Rami and Weinberg, Rachel and Weiner, Ryan H. and Wiens, Roger C. and Williford, Kenneth and Wollonciej, Chris and Wu, Yen-Hung and Yingst, R. Aileen and Zan, Jason},
      journal = {Space Science Reviews},
      volume = {217},
      number = {58},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.1007/s11214-021-00812-z}
    }
  8. Osterhout, J. T., Farley, K. A., Wadhwa, M., Treffkorn, J. and Kulczycki, E. (2024). Helium Leak Rate Measurements of Flight-like Mars 2020 Sample Tubes. Astrobiology, 1. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{osterhout2024helium,
      title = {Helium Leak Rate Measurements of Flight-like Mars 2020 Sample Tubes},
      author = {Osterhout, Jeffrey T. and Farley, Kenneth A. and Wadhwa, Meenakshi and Treffkorn, Jonathan and Kulczycki, Eric},
      year = {2024},
      journal = {Astrobiology},
      volume = {24},
      number = {1},
      pages = {36--43},
      doi = {10.1089/ast.2023.0002},
      url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795500/}
    }
  9. McBryan, E., Francis, P. and Sobey, A. (2025). Dust Mitigation for the VIPER Mobility System. NASA, 20250005201. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{mcbryan2025dust,
      title = {Dust Mitigation for the VIPER Mobility System},
      author = {McBryan, Emily and Francis, Parker and Sobey, Alexander},
      year = {2025},
      institution = {NASA},
      number = {20250005201},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250005201},
      booktitle = {55th International Conference on Environmental Systems},
      doi = {10.32865/2346/108814}
    }
  10. Wiesner, V. L., Wohl, C. J., King, G. C., Gordon, K. L., Das, L. and Hernandez, J. J. (2023). Protective Coatings for Lunar Dust Tolerance. NASA, NASA/TM-20230003195. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{wiesner2023protective,
      title = {Protective Coatings for Lunar Dust Tolerance},
      author = {Wiesner, Valerie L. and Wohl, Christopher J. and King, Glen C. and Gordon, Keith L. and Das, Lopamudra and Hernandez, Jonathan J.},
      year = {2023},
      institution = {NASA},
      number = {NASA/TM-20230003195},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230003195}
    }
  11. Park, I.-W., Smith, T., Sanchez, H., Wong, S. W., Piacenza, P. and Ciocarlie, M. (2017). Developing a 3-DOF Compliant Perching Arm for a Free-Flying Robot on the International Space Station. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{kam2025abdom,
      title = {Developing a 3-DOF Compliant Perching Arm for a Free-Flying Robot on the International Space Station},
      author = {Park, In-Won and Smith, Trey and Sanchez, Hugo and Wong, Sze Wun and Piacenza, Pedro and Ciocarlie, Matei},
      year = {2017},
      booktitle = {2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)},
      pages = {1135-1141},
      doi = {10.1109/aim.2017.8014171},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170009546}
    }
  12. Merstallinger, A., Semerad, E. and Dunn, B. D. (2003). Influence of Coatings and Alloying on Cold Welding due to Impact and Fretting. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{merstallinger2003cold,
      title = {Influence of Coatings and Alloying on Cold Welding due to Impact and Fretting},
      author = {Merstallinger, A. and Semerad, E. and Dunn, B. D.},
      booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th European Space Mechanisms and Tribology Symposium (ESMATS), San Sebastian},
      year = {2003},
      url = {https://www.esmats.eu/esmatspapers/pastpapers/pdfs/2003/merstallinger.pdf}
    }