Skip to content

Chang'e-5 Sampling System

Chang’e-5 is the sample return step of the three-phase Chinese Lunar Exploration Program, which planned to orbit, land, and return. The spacecraft comprises four elements, an orbiter, a lander, an ascender and a return capsule. It launched on 24 November 2020 from Wenchang, landed on 1 December 2020 at 43.1 N, 51.8 W in northern Oceanus Procellarum about 170 km east-northeast of Mons Rumker, and the capsule returned to Earth on 17 December 2020, bringing back 1731 g of material including a drill core of about 1 m [11].

Two independent sampling mechanisms were flown: a rotary-percussive drill for a subsurface core, and a four-joint robotic arm carrying scoops for surface material [12]. The drilling and surface primary packages were designed separately to keep the two sample types isolated through physical separation, before both were transferred to the sealed capsule [12]. Luna 16 and 20 drilled with an extended manipulator carrying the sampler and Luna 24 used a slide-rail impact drill [12]. The site was chosen on young mare basalt within the recommended engineering envelope: average slope under 8 degrees over most of the candidate area, and a solar elevation angle at landing of 30 to 50 degrees [3], a window that also constrains the latitude band Chinese landers favor to roughly 30 to 60 degrees [3]. The later Chang’e-6 far-side site turned out to have its own young mare basalts [7]. Two eruption ages were dated there by Pb-Pb isotopes, 4203 million years and 2807 million years [7], the younger one matching the crater-counting age for that terrain [7].

ParameterValueSource
Sampling mechanismsrotary-percussive coring drill and a four-joint scooping arm[11]
Arm joints4, sampler attached at joint 4[11]
Arm repeat positioning accuracybetter than 1 mm[12]
Arm degrees of freedom in sampler attitudepitch adjustable, roll not adjustable[9]
Drill maximum single-machine powergreater than 800 W[12]
Drill rotary speed limitbelow 200 r/min[10]
Auger radius32 mm[10]
Auger flight thickness, height, helix angle10.53 mm, 2 mm, 14 degrees[10]
Bitfour blades, 10 mm blade width, 90 degree rake angle[10]
Sampler sensingbinocular work-area camera, close-range sampler camera, touching-disc force sensor[9]
ParameterValueSource
Landing site43.1 N, 51.8 W, northern Oceanus Procellarum[11]
Surface operations windowfrom touchdown on 1 December 2020 to ascent, entirely within one lunar day[11]
Drilling and coring duration3.12 h[12]
Drill travel into regolith1.68 m[12]
Effective core length recoveredabout 1 m, against a 2 m goal[11], [12]
Surface sampling duration15.82 h[12]
Surface sampling operations2 contact, 10 non-contact[12]
Surface sample massabout 1.5 kg[11]
Total returned mass1731 g[11], [12]
Sealing cover opening time169 s[12]

For comparison, the Apollo Lunar Surface Drill used on Apollo 15, 16 and 17 ran to a maximum 280 r/min at up to 37.8 Hz impact frequency and 4.4 J per blow, over a 250 to 300 cm depth range; Luna 16 reached about 35 cm for 101 g and Luna 20 aborted at 25 cm for about 55 g after motor overheating [12].

Not mobile. The lander is fixed and the only articulation is the sampling arm. The arm has four joints, with the sampler attached at joint 4, and its motion limits make the valid sampling region a sector on the surface in front of the lander [11].

The sampler can adjust its pitch angle but not its roll [9], so a sideways slope under the scoop cannot be compensated by the arm and directly degrades control of scooping depth. The Chang’e-6 site selection algorithm penalizes slope in the roll direction for this reason [9]. The arm is described by the program as lightweight and small with a large reach and high load, integrating shovelling, digging, suction, receiving and grasping, with repeated positioning accuracy better than 1 mm and several working modes for multi-point sampling [12].

Bus power for the sampling system is not published. Maximum single-machine power in the drilling chain exceeds 800 W [12]. The lander operated between touchdown on 1 December 2020 and ascent entirely within a single lunar day [11], so no night survival was required of the sampling mechanism or its electronics. Total surface mechanism run time was 3.12 h of drilling and 15.82 h of surface sampling [12].

No thermal design is published for the sampling system specifically. The drill’s outer pipe carries helical blades whose stated function is both to discharge cuttings and to dissipate heat [11], which is the only thermal design detail published: in vacuum there is no convective path out of a borehole, so the chip flow itself has to carry the drilling heat away.

Not published in detail. The sampling system’s sensing is documented: a binocular camera supervising the work area, a close-range camera on the sampler with a narrow field of view used to monitor scooping and inspect collected soil, and a force sensor at the bottom of the sampler’s touching disc that indicates contact with the surface [9]. The imaging suite supporting sampling also included Sampling Monitoring Cameras, Panoramic Cameras and a Far-range Camera [11].

Sample points were confirmed manually, with images as the operators’ main criterion, and each point was analyzed and checked individually for safety and sampling quality [9]. The surface sampling campaign occupied 15.82 h for 12 operations, against 3.12 h for the drilling campaign [12].

Pose fine-tuning was also manual. Because the arm has inherent movement errors, including flexible deformation, the sampler cannot reach the target pose in a single commanded motion. On Chang’e-5 a specialized operator performed the fine-tuning, aided by an added “touching moon” step to confirm the height of the terrain, estimating the sampler height by reference to multiple images and determining the required adjustment [9]. That procedure required complex operator training and carried a high time cost.

The failure modes are asymmetric: too high and the shovel never contacts the soil and collects nothing; too low and it digs in, takes excessive soil and can become stuck, which is a hazard to the mission [9].

Direct to Earth from the near side at 43.1 N, 51.8 W [11]. No relay satellite was required, unlike a far-side mission, which cannot see Earth directly and depends on a relay spacecraft in a halo orbit around the Earth-Moon L2 point [5]. China’s first such relay, Queqiao, entered that halo orbit on 14 June 2018 to support Chang’e-4’s far-side landing and rover, more than two years before Chang’e-5 flew [5]. Link parameters for the sampling system are not published.

Developed by Beijing Spacecrafts [11]. It comprises a drilling mechanism, a loading device and a coring system. The drill stem is a coaxial pair of pipes: the outer pipe rotates and carries helical blades that discharge cuttings and dissipate heat, while the inner pipe remains static relative to the regolith and is thin-walled and hollow so as to preserve the original stratigraphic layering.

Coring uses a soft sampling bag. The bag is installed on the inner wall of the inner pipe, surrounds the regolith as it enters the hollow pipe, and is then extracted and convolved into the primary package device for drilled samples before transfer to the sealing capsule on top of the ascender [11].

A conventional auger transports material along a rotating flight and destroys stratigraphy. Keeping the inner tube stationary lets the core column slide into the bag without being churned, and convolving the bag afterwards stows a 1 m core in a container much shorter than the core [11]. The design goal was to penetrate and recover about 2 m of regolith; the achieved core was about 1 m over 1.68 m of drill travel [12].

The drive is coaxial footage-rotation-percussion, with maximum single-machine power above 800 W [12]. Rotary speed on Chang’e-5 was limited below 200 r/min against a general upper bound of 300 r/min for planetary regolith augers, and the published drill tool geometry gives an auger radius of 32 mm, flight thickness 10.53 mm, flight height 2 mm and helix angle 14 degrees, with a four-blade bit of 10 mm blade width, 90 degree rake angle, 7.4 mm extruding part height and 75 degree extruding helix angle [10]. The simulant used for these load tests has an internal friction angle of 35.1 degrees and cohesion of 2.85 kPa [10], denser and more cohesive than CAS-1, an earlier Chinese lunar soil simulant matched to Apollo 14 regolith, at 33.3 degrees and 1.0 kPa [8]. CAS-1 was built from low-Ti basaltic scoria from the Jinlongdingzi volcano in northeast China [8].

Drill-soil interaction is modeled in four parts, cuttings screw conveyance, cuttings extruding, cuttings bulldozing and in-situ simulant cutting, from passive earth pressure theory, because the mechanical properties of the cuttings and of the undisturbed simulant differ [10]. The screw conveyance term is small: calculated conveying loads of 1.4 to 2.2 N.mm sit three orders of magnitude below the measured total drilling torque of 0.1 to 1 N.m [10].

The Surface Sampling System was developed by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and consists of four joints, two samplers and a close-range camera [11]. The sampler assembly carries a touching disc with a force sensor, a front-end shovel, and the close-up camera [9].

Before sampling, images from the sampling monitoring, panoramic, far-range and close-range cameras were used to establish a sampling plan; the arm then scooped surface regolith and rock fragments with the two samplers and placed them into the primary package device for surface samples on top of the lander. The scooping device performed 12 separate sampling operations, 2 of them contact and 10 non-contact, and gathered about 1.5 kg of material from around the lander [12].

Two lander payloads existed largely to inform and contextualize the sampling [11]:

  • Lunar Mineralogical Spectrometer (LMS). Acousto-optic tunable filter spectrometer, 480 to 3200 nm across a VIS/NIR module (480 to 950 nm visible, 900 to 1450 nm near infrared) and an IR module (1400 to 2450 nm short infrared, 2400 to 3200 nm middle infrared), spectral resolution 3 to 25 nm, detection range 2 to 5 m, field of view 4.24 by 4.24 degrees, with aluminum and Infragold calibration plates [11]. It observed the surface before and after sampling, targeting hydrated minerals.
  • Lunar Regolith Penetrating Radar (LRPR). An ultra-wideband array radar of 12 bow-tie antennas, 1 to 3 GHz, mounted asymmetrically around the drill 90 cm above the ground [11]. It transmits carrier-free pulses of 200 ps full width at half maximum; antennas take turns transmitting while the others receive, giving 132 traces per operating period, each with a 55 ns time window sampled at 18.3 ps. Detection depth is at least 2 m with vertical resolution 5 cm or better [11].

The radar is mounted around the drill so that it measures regolith structure and thickness in the volume the drill is about to enter [11], which the 1.68 m of drill travel then samples directly [12]. A pre-mission crater-counting survey of the landing area, using a 1.5 m per pixel orthomosaic built from 765 orbital images, mapped 958 craters [6]. It put mean regolith thickness at 7.15 m with a standard deviation of 2.59 m, ranging 0.74 to 18.00 m [6], well beyond the radar’s stated 2 m detection depth and the drill’s 1.68 m reach.

The surface sequence is fixed rather than mode-driven [11]:

  1. Unlock the drilling system and scooping system after landing.
  2. Drill and core; separate the sample, transfer it to the primary package device for drilled samples, then transport it to the sealing capsule.
  3. Scoop surface samples with the arm; transfer them to the primary package device for surface samples on top of the lander for primary packaging; then have the arm carry that device to the sealing capsule on top of the ascender.
  4. Seal the capsule, with drilled and surface samples remaining separate inside it.

The sealing packaging device cover opened in 169 s [12].

In step 3 the arm is used twice, as a sampling tool and as a transport mechanism for the whole primary package device, in place of a dedicated transfer mechanism [11]. Sealing is achieved by a sealing ring with metal extrusion before ascent, giving an ultra-low leakage rate [12].

Operated by CNSA through the Lunar Exploration and Space Engineering Center, with the Ground Research Application System in Beijing as the primary sample storage and curation center [11]. During surface operations the ground role was heavy: operators built the sampling plan from returned imagery, confirmed each sample point individually, and performed pose fine-tuning by hand [9].

Ground operations continue long after the flight. The capsule landed in Inner Mongolia on 17 December 2020, was packaged and sealed in a nitrogen-filled transfer box, and moved to the Lunar Sample Laboratory at GRAS [11]. The curation procedure is documented: GRAS receives the sealed package, the sample bags are unsealed, scooped and drilled samples are removed and cataloged separately in two containers, the drilled sample soft bag is cut into sections of 15 cm each, and scooped samples are placed into a square container and classified by type. Permanent storage samples then go to a permanent storage glove box in the long-term storage room while research and backup samples go to a temporary glove box. All tools contacting samples are stainless steel, PTFE, quartz glass or other materials of known composition, and pure nitrogen pressure in the glove boxes is monitored to prevent terrestrial contamination. Storage is duplicated, with a primary facility and a remote disaster-tolerant backup.

Sectioning the drill core at 15 cm preserves depth information only because the soft bag preserved the column order during coring [11].

The dual-pipe soft-bag corer takes a meter-scale core, preserves its layering, and stows it in a container much shorter than the core: a static inner tube, a thin wall, helical outer flights carrying both chips and drilling heat, and a convolved bag [11]. Luna 16 and 20 returned their samples encapsulated inside the drill pipe, which distorted the bedding information; Luna 24 already used a soft coring bag wound into a sample barrel, and Chang’e-5 extends that principle to a meter-scale core with a static inner tube [12].

Coring and surface sampling are separated into two independent mechanisms whose products stay separate through two-stage packaging, sealing, ascent, rendezvous and return [11], [12]. Chang’e-6 reused the architecture directly at a far-side site, where a direct link like Chang’e-5’s is not possible and a relay satellite is required instead [5], and returned its capsule to Inner Mongolia on 25 June 2024 carrying 1935.3 g of material [1]. That far-side soil has a bulk density of 0.983 g/cm3, lower than the Chang’e-5 samples [2], and a maximum static angle of repose of 52.9 degrees against 70.4 degrees dynamic, both substantially higher than the Chang’e-5 soil simulant, evidence of stronger cohesion in the far-side regolith [4].

The automatic chain of sampling, packaging, sealing, lunar surface takeoff and lunar orbit rendezvous and docking is listed by the program as the set of key technologies the mission was designed to develop [11]. Chang’e-5 is the first robotic sample return via lunar orbit rendezvous rather than direct ascent.

Two-stage packaging with sealing-ring and metal-extrusion sealing achieved an ultra-low leakage rate before ascent [12]. Sample stratification and compactness were nevertheless not preserved in the in-situ sense, and no rock samples were taken, both attributed to limits on drill power and sampling method.

Manual sampling operations were the throughput limit. Individual image-based confirmation of each sample point and operator-driven pose fine-tuning both worked and both cost enough time that the successor mission replaced them with an autonomous vision pipeline [9].

References

  1. (2026). CNSA: Chang'e-6 collects 1935.3 grams of samples from the moon's far side. cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c10573149/content.html
    BibTeX
    @misc{cnsachange2,
      title = {CNSA: Chang'e-6 collects 1935.3 grams of samples from the moon's far side},
      organization = {cnsa.gov.cn},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c10573149/content.html}
    }
  2. Li, C., Hu, H., Yang, M.-F., Liu, J., Zhou, Q., Ren, X., Liu, B., Liu, D., Zeng, X., Zuo, W., Zhang, G., Zhang, H., Yang, S., Wang, Q., Deng, X., Gao, X., Su, Y., Wen, W. and Ouyang, Z. (2024). Nature of the lunar far-side samples returned by the Chang'E-6 mission . National Science Review, 11. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{li2024nature,
      title = {Nature of the lunar far-side samples returned by the {Chang'E-6} mission},
      author = {Li, Chunlai and Hu, Hao and Yang, Meng-Fei and Liu, Jianjun and Zhou, Qin and Ren, Xin and Liu, Bin and Liu, Dawei and Zeng, Xingguo and Zuo, Wei and Zhang, Guangliang and Zhang, Hongbo and Yang, Saihong and Wang, Qiong and Deng, Xiangjin and Gao, Xingye and Su, Yan and Wen, Weibin and Ouyang, Ziyuan},
      journal = {National Science Review},
      volume = {11},
      number = {11},
      pages = {nwae328},
      year = {2024},
      doi = {10.1093/nsr/nwae328},
      abstract = {ABSTRACT The Chang'E-6 (CE-6) mission successfully achieved return of the first samples from the far side of the Moon. The sampling site of CE-6 is located in the South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin—the largest, deepest and oldest impact basin on the Moon. The 1935.3 g of CE-6 lunar samples exhibit distinct characteristics compared with previous lunar samples. This study analyses the physical, mineralogical, petrographic and geochemical properties of CE-6 lunar scooped samples. The CE-6 soil has a significantly lower bulk density (0.983 g/cm3) and true density (3.035 g/cm3) than the Chang'E-5 (CE-5) samples. The grain size of the CE-6 soil exhibits a bimodal distribution, indicating a mixture of different compositions. Mineralogically, the CE-6 soil consists of 32.6% plagioclase (anorthite and bytownite), 19.7% augite, 10% pigeonite and 3.6% orthopyroxene, and with low content of olivine (0.5%) but high content of amorphous glass (29.4%). Geochemically, the bulk composition of CE-6 soil is rich in Al2O3 (14%) and CaO (12%) but low in FeO (17%), and trace elements of CE-6 soil such as K (∼630 ppm), U (0.26 ppm), Th (0.92 ppm) and rare-earth elements are significantly lower than those of the lunar soils within the Procellarum KREEP Terrane. The local basalts are characterized by low-Ti (TiO2, 5.08%), low-Al (Al2O3 9.85%) and low-K (∼830 ppm), features suggesting that the CE-6 soil is a mixture of local basalts and non-basaltic ejecta. The returned CE-6 sample contains diverse lithic fragments, including local mare basalt, breccia, agglutinate, glasses and leucocrate. These local mare basalts document the volcanic history of the lunar far side, while the non-basaltic fragments may offer critical insights into the lunar highland crust, SPA impact melts and potentially the deep lunar mantle, making these samples highly significant for scientific research.}
    }
  3. Liu, J., Zeng, X., Li, C., Ren, X., Yan, W., Tan, X., Zhang, X., Chen, W., Zuo, W., Liu, Y., Liu, B., Liu, D., Zhou, Q. and Ouyang, Z. (2021). Landing Site Selection and Overview of China's Lunar Landing Missions . Space Science Reviews. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{liu2021landing,
      title = {Landing Site Selection and Overview of China's Lunar Landing Missions},
      author = {Liu, Jianjun and Zeng, Xingguo and Li, Chunlai and Ren, Xin and Yan, Wei and Tan, Xu and Zhang, Xiaoxia and Chen, Wangli and Zuo, Wei and Liu, Yuxuan and Liu, Bin and Liu, Dawei and Zhou, Qin and Ouyang, Ziyuan},
      journal = {Space Science Reviews},
      volume = {217},
      pages = {6},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.1007/s11214-020-00781-9},
      abstract = {Abstract Landing site selection is of fundamental importance for lunar landing mission and it is closely related to the scientific goals of the mission. According to the widely concerned lunar science goals and the landing site selection of the ongoing lunar missions; China has carried out the selection of landing site for a series of Chang’ E (CE) missions. Under this background, this paper firstly introduced the principles, process, method and result of landing site selection of China’s Lunar Exploration Program (CLEP), and then analyzed the support of the selected landing sites to the corresponding lunar research. This study also pointed out the outcomes that could possibly contribute to the key lunar questions on the basis of the selected landing sites of CE-4 and CE-5 such as deep material in South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin, lunar chronology, volcanic thermodynamics and geological structure evolution history of the Moon. Finally, this approach analyzed the development trend of China’s follow-up lunar landing missions, and suggested that the South Pole Region of the Moon could be the landing site of high priority for the future CE missions.}
    }
  4. Qi, S., Li, L., Hou, X., Qiao, S., Ma, X., Lu, X., Cong, J., Hao, R., Zhang, C., Li, J., Elsworth, D., Yang, W., Li, X.-H. and Wu, F.-Y. (2025). Strongly Cohesive Lunar Soil Identified at the Chang'e-6 Landing Site . Nature Astronomy. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{qi2025strongly,
      title = {Strongly Cohesive Lunar Soil Identified at the Chang'e-6 Landing Site},
      author = {Qi, Shengwen and Li, Lihui and Hou, Xiaokun and Qiao, Sijia and Ma, Xiandong and Lu, Xiao and Cong, Jianing and Hao, Ruipeng and Zhang, Chi and Li, Jinhua and Elsworth, Derek and Yang, Wei and Li, Xian-Hua and Wu, Fu-Yuan},
      journal = {Nature Astronomy},
      volume = {10},
      pages = {214-223},
      year = {2025},
      doi = {10.1038/s41550-025-02715-3},
      abstract = {Abstract The physical properties of lunar soil are critical to understanding its evolution. However, the extent of the diversity among the global lunar soils remains unclear owing to limited sampling sites. Here we present a systematic investigation of the angle of repose (AOR), particle morphology and size distribution of soil obtained at the Chang’e-6 (CE-6) landing site, the first sample from the lunar farside. The CE-6 sample has a maximum static AOR of 52.9°, which is substantially higher than those of the Chang’e-5 and Apollo soil simulants. In addition, a substantially larger dynamic AOR of 70.4° is exhibited by the CE-6 sample compared with the CE-5 soil simulant, indicating a stronger cohesive property. This strong cohesive property can be attributed to the high plagioclase abundance and potentially strong space weathering at the sampling, especially impact reworking, which resulted in a fine particle size ( D 60 = 48.4 μm) of the CE-6 sample with a high portion of the intermediate fraction (that is, 11–125 μm) and a more complex morphology with a small mean sphericity ( S mean = 0.58). These characteristics enhance the cohesiveness by strengthening electrostatic and van der Waals forces. This finding discloses key factors controlling the AOR and provides a fresh genesis perspective for understanding the physical properties of lunar soil, with implications for lunar evolution and future lunar resource utilization.}
    }
  5. Wu, W., Wang, Q., Tang, Y., Yu, D., Wang, C., Liu, J., Zheng, L., Zhang, L. and Wang, F. (2021). Development and Prospect of Chinese Lunar Relay Communication Satellite . Space: Science & Technology. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{wu2021development,
      title = {Development and Prospect of Chinese Lunar Relay Communication Satellite},
      author = {Wu, Weiren and Wang, Qiong and Tang, Yuhua and Yu, Dengyun and Wang, Chi and Liu, Jizhong and Zheng, Lei and Zhang, Lihua and Wang, Feng},
      journal = {Space: Science & Technology},
      volume = {2021},
      pages = {3471608},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.34133/2021/3471608},
      abstract = {Relay communication satellites play a very important role on the lunar far side and pole areas exploration missions. Queqiao relay communication satellite was developed to provide relay communication support for the lander and the rover of Chang’e-4 mission landing on the far side of the Moon. From entering into the halo mission orbit around Earth-Moon libration point 2 on June 14, 2018, it has operated on the orbit more than thirty months. It worked very well and provided reliable, continuous relay communication support for the lander and the rover to accomplish the goals of Chang’e-4 lunar far side soft landing and patrol exploration mission. Exploration of the lunar south polar regions is of high scientific interest. A new relay communication satellite for Chinese south pole exploration mission is also under study. The system design and on-orbit operation status of Queqiao relay communication satellite were summarized in this paper. The system concept of the relay communication satellite for lunar south pole exploration missions is proposed. Finally, the future development and prospect of the lunar relay communication satellite system are given.}
    }
  6. Yue, Z., Di, K., Liu, Z., Michael, G., Jia, M., Xin, X., Liu, B., Peng, M. and Liu, J. (2019). Lunar regolith thickness deduced from concentric craters in the CE-5 landing area . Icarus. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{yue2019lunar,
      title = {Lunar regolith thickness deduced from concentric craters in the CE-5 landing area},
      author = {Yue, Z. and Di, Kaichang and Liu, Z. and Michael, G. and Jia, M. and Xin, X. and Liu, B. and Peng, Man and Liu, J.},
      journal = {Icarus},
      volume = {329},
      pages = {46-54},
      publisher = {Elsevier BV},
      year = {2019},
      doi = {10.1016/j.icarus.2019.03.032}
    }
  7. Zhang, Q. W. L., Yang, M.-H., Li, Q.-L., Liu, Y., Yue, Z.-Y., Zhou, Q., Chen, L.-Y., Ma, H.-X., Yang, S.-H., Tang, X., Zhang, G.-L., Ren, X. and Li, X.-H. (2024). Lunar farside volcanism 2.8 billion years ago from Chang'e-6 basalts . Nature. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{zhang2024lunar,
      title = {Lunar farside volcanism 2.8 billion years ago from Chang'e-6 basalts},
      author = {Zhang, Qian W. L. and Yang, Mu-Han and Li, Qiu-Li and Liu, Yu and Yue, Zong-Yu and Zhou, Qin and Chen, Liu-Yang and Ma, Hong-Xia and Yang, Sai-Hong and Tang, Xu and Zhang, Guang-Liang and Ren, Xin and Li, Xian-Hua},
      journal = {Nature},
      volume = {638},
      pages = {927--930},
      year = {2024},
      doi = {10.1038/s41586-024-08382-0},
      abstract = {Abstract Unravelling the volcanic history of the enigmatic lunar farside is essential for understanding the hemispheric dichotomy of the Moon 1–3 . Cratering chronology established for the lunar nearside has been used to suggest long-lived volcanism on the farside of the Moon 3,4 but without sample verification. We describe two episodes of basaltic volcanism identified by Pb–Pb dating of basalt fragments returned by the Chang’e-6 mission. One high-Al basalt fragment, dated at 4,203 ± 4 million years ago (Ma), has a source 238 U/ 204 Pb ratio ( µ value) of approximately 1,620, implying a KREEP-rich (K, rare earth elements and P) source for this oldest-known example of basaltic volcanism among returned samples. The main volcanic episode of the Chang’e-6 basalt documents a surprisingly young eruption age of 2,807 ± 3 Ma, which has not been observed on the nearside of the Moon. The initial Pb isotope compositions of these younger basalts indicate a derivation from a source with a µ value of approximately 360, indicating a KREEP-poor mantle source. Mare volcanism on the lunar farside thus persisted for over 1.4 billion years, even if the source was depleted in heat-producing elements. The consistency between the 2.8-billion-year basalt age and the crater-counting age indicates that the cratering chronology model established for the lunar nearside is also applicable to the farside of the Moon.}
    }
  8. Zheng, Y., Wang, S., Ouyang, Z., Zou, Y., Liu, J., Li, C., Li, X. and Feng, J. (2008). CAS-1 lunar soil simulant . Advances in Space Research. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{zheng2008cas,
      title = {CAS-1 lunar soil simulant},
      author = {Zheng, Yongchun and Wang, Shijie and Ouyang, Ziyuan and Zou, Yongliao and Liu, Jianzhong and Li, Chunlai and Li, Xiongyao and Feng, Junming},
      journal = {Advances in Space Research},
      volume = {43},
      pages = {448-454},
      year = {2008},
      doi = {10.1016/j.asr.2008.07.006}
    }
  9. Chen, C., Jia, X., Zhang, G., Zheng, Y., Deng, X. and Qu, Y. (2025). Vision-based sampling implementation in the Chang'e-6 lunar farside sample return mission . Light: Advanced Manufacturing, 10. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{chen2025vision,
      title = {Vision-based sampling implementation in the Chang'e-6 lunar farside sample return mission},
      author = {Chen, Congjia and Jia, Xiaoyu and Zhang, Gao and Zheng, Yanhong and Deng, Xiangjin and Qu, Yufu},
      journal = {Light: Advanced Manufacturing},
      volume = {6},
      number = {10},
      pages = {1},
      year = {2025},
      doi = {10.37188/lam.2025.010},
      abstract = {Lunar sample return missions are crucial for researching the composition and origin of the Moon. In recent decades, several lunar sample return missions have been conducted, yielding abundant and valuable lunar samples. As the latest development in lunar sample returns, the Chang’e-6 mission aimed to implement lunar farside sampling. The shorter time available for sampling requires higher sampling efficiency. In this study, the main factors in the sampling site selection and sampling process are introduced and a vision-based sampling implementation is designed for the Chang’e-6 mission to significantly simplify manual operation while maintaining high sampling quality. By sufficiently leveraging the point cloud data reconstructed from the binocular camera images, autonomous terrain analysis and sample point selection are achieved. A 6D pose estimation pipeline based on point cloud registration provides a robust method for sampler pose measurement, replacing the previous manual fine-tuning process and achieving better accuracy. Owing to the well-analyzed sample points and accurate fine-tuning, the proposed approach demonstrates high accuracy in controlling the scooping depth, while significantly reducing the time cost of the sampling implementation, effectively supporting the Chang’e-6 lunar sample mission.}
    }
  10. Quan, Q.-Q., Chen, C.-B., Deng, Z.-Q., Tang, J.-Y. and Tang, D.-W. (2018). On Modeling Drilling Load in Lunar Regolith Simulant . Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{quan2018modeling,
      title = {On Modeling Drilling Load in Lunar Regolith Simulant},
      author = {Quan, Qi-Quan and Chen, Chong-Bin and Deng, Zong-Quan and Tang, Jun-Yue and Tang, De-Wei},
      journal = {Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering},
      volume = {31},
      pages = {20},
      year = {2018},
      doi = {10.1186/s10033-018-0207-8},
      abstract = {Drilling and coring, as effective ways to obtain lunar regolith along the longitudinal direction, are widely applied in the lunar sampling field. Conventionally, modeling of drill-soil interaction was divided into soil cutting and screw conveyance processes, ignoring the differences in soil mechanical properties between them. To improve the modeling accuracy, a hypothesis that divides the drill-soil interaction into four parts: cuttings screw conveyance, cuttings extruding, cuttings bulldozing, and in situ simulant cutting, is proposed to establish a novel model based on the passive earth pressure theory. An iterative numerical calculation method is developed to predict the drilling loads. A drilling and coring testbed is developed to conduct experimental tests. Drilling experiments indicate that the drilling loads calculated by the proposed model match well the experimental results. The proposed research provides the instructions to adopt a suitable drilling strategy to match the rotary and penetrating motions, to increase the safety and reliability of drilling control in lunar sampling missions.}
    }
  11. Xiao, L., Qian, Y., Wang, Q. and Wang, Q. (2021). The Chang'e-5 mission . Sample Return Missions: The Last Frontier of Solar System Exploration. Source
    BibTeX
    @incollection{xiao2021chang,
      title = {The Chang'e-5 mission},
      author = {Xiao, Long and Qian, Yuqi and Wang, Qian and Wang, Qiong},
      booktitle = {Sample Return Missions: The Last Frontier of Solar System Exploration},
      pages = {195--206},
      publisher = {Elsevier},
      chapter = {9},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.1016/b978-0-12-818330-4.00009-4}
    }
  12. Xie, H., Liu, J., Li, C., Gao, M., Zhang, Z. and Yang, M. (2022). The novel idea and technical progress of lunar in-situ condition preserved coring . Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{xie2022novel,
      title = {The novel idea and technical progress of lunar in-situ condition preserved coring},
      author = {Xie, Heping and Liu, Jianfeng and Li, Cunbao and Gao, Mingzhong and Zhang, Zetian and Yang, Mingqing},
      journal = {Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources},
      volume = {8},
      pages = {46},
      year = {2022},
      doi = {10.1007/s40948-022-00350-0},
      abstract = {Abstract The moon is rich in material resources, lunar-based sampling is the foundation for an in-depth understanding of lunar material resources endowment characteristics, exploring the evolution of lunar geological structure, and realizing lunar material resources exploitation. This paper briefly introduces the lunar sampling work represented by the Apollo program of the United States, the Luna program of the former Soviet Union, and China’s Chang’E-5 lunar exploration mission, a total of 10 times of successful coring were performed, with a maximum coring depth of 305 cm and a maximum sampling of 110.5 kg. It presents an in-depth analysis of the inadequacy of the existing lunar coring principles and technologies. This paper expounds on the critical strategic significance and scientific value of lunar in-situ condition preserved coring (ICP-Coring). Simultaneously, this paper firstly refines the scientific concept of lunar ICP-Coring in the field of deep space material resources exploitation as the "four preservations" coring (preservation of composition, vacuum storage, stratification/bedding, and compactness)—the "4 Ps" coring, puts forward the fundamental principles, conception, breakthrough theory, and critical core technology of the "4 Ps" lunar ICP-Coring. It explains the latest research progress, including core drilling machinery, film-forming mechanism while drilling, and a platform for fidelity coring testing and analysis under a simulated lunar environment. The research results provide theoretical and technical support for lunar ICP-Coring and resource exploration.}
    }