Skip to content

Scarab on the outdoor Simulated Lunar Operations dune at NASA GRC, 2009. The four independently driven 65 cm wheels sit on the differenced rocker suspension and the vertical structure carries both the drill and the navigation sensors NASA. Public domain (NASA / US government work).

Scarab is a lunar prospecting rover built at Carnegie Mellon University in 2007 to carry a coring drill into permanently shadowed polar craters [1], [4]. The reference mission lands the rover on the floor of a permanently shadowed crater, where it traverses kilometers in darkness on radioisotope power, stopping to drill into the near subsurface. Its chassis reconfigures to stabilize the drill against the ground and to change ride height for driving on steep unconsolidated slopes.

Scarab was the flight-like carrier for the RESOLVE payload, the Regolith and Environment Science and Oxygen and Lunar Volatile Extraction instrument suite, and drove with the RESOLVE drill and instruments at the PISCES lunar analog site on Mauna Kea, Hawaii [4]. The vehicle line that followed it is NASA’s Resource Prospector, whose rover was designed and built at NASA JSC with Ames [12], and which was canceled before flight [5].

Vehicle characteristics as built:

ParameterValue
Mass280 kg
Weight, Earth surface2740 N
Weight, lunar surface450 N
Footprintroughly 1.5 by 1.5 m
Drill tower height, upright2.2 m high stance, 1.6 m low stance
Average power available100 W
Nominal power175 to 200 W
Idle power24 W
Locomotion speed3 to 6 cm/s
Wheel diameter65 cm
Track width1.4 m
Wheelbase0.8 to 1.4 m, 1.2 m nominal
Track to wheelbase aspect ratio1:1.0 low, 1:1.2 nominal, 1:1.7 high stance
Center of gravity, planaron geometric center
Center of gravity height0.48 m low, 0.64 m nominal, 0.74 m high stance
Static pitch-over angle56 degrees low, 43 degrees nominal, 30 degrees high stance
Static roll-over angle61 degrees low, 53 degrees nominal, 49 degrees high stance
Maximum straddle55 cm
Minimum straddlebelly contact
Approach and departure angle105 degrees nominal stance
Breakover angle115 degrees nominal stance
Belly clearance30 cm, maintained while the body pitches

Center of gravity height and the static tip-over angles were measured empirically on a tilt table rather than computed [1]. Pitch-over refers to tipping forward or backward and roll-over to tipping sideways; on Scarab these are symmetrical.

Scarab did not fly. The reference mission it was sized for is a crater-floor survey on the order of 25 drill sites, with kilometers of traverse between them and 25 cores taken [1], [4], run as a serialized cycle of drive, charge batteries, drill, charge, repeat. Power was assumed to come from a radioisotope thermoelectric generator of the Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator class.

In field testing the vehicle completed a continuous traverse of 1 km, roughly the distance it would cover between drill sites on such a mission, and drove terrain including graded slopes and craters about 5 m across formed in loose mixed-grain slag [1]. It climbed rock obstacles of 40 to 50 cm.

Four wheels, chosen to reduce degrees of freedom while giving a stable base; more than four wheels over-defines a surface. Steering is skid steering rather than explicit steering, selected for system simplicity and on the precedent of the Lunokhod rovers. The suspension is passive and kinematic rather than sprung, because at 3 to 6 cm/s with lunar gravity acting on the vehicle mass there are no dynamic loads worth damping [1].

Skid steering trades away the actuators of an explicit steering mechanism at the cost of high wheel slip during turns; wheel design research for another lunar rover found that diagonal grousers reduce point-turn sinkage without adding mass or volume [3]. Widening or enlarging the wheel also reduced sinkage, but not without a mass and volume cost [3].

Left and right rockers are connected by a differencing linkage that averages the two sides: as one side pitches up the other pitches down by the same amount relative to the body, and the body pitch angle is the mean of the two, so the body pitches considerably less than it otherwise would. A geared differential was rejected because the center of the vehicle is occupied by the drill workspace; a linkage running around that volume was used instead. To keep 30 cm of belly clearance as the body pitches, the underbody is scalloped, with the reference case one wheel on top of a 30 cm rock [1].

Active adjustability is layered on top of the passive differencing and is independent of it, so wheelbase and body height can be set separately on each side and the body can be leaned. The adjustment mechanism is a five-bar doubler linkage driven by an electric linear actuator, similar to the linkages used to pitch backhoe buckets through large angles; a flight implementation would likely use a rotary actuator for sealing and stroke. Point turning is possible across a large range of poses with considerable wheelbase variation.

Each of the four wheels is directly and independently driven, with a brushless motor, planetary gearhead and harmonic drive embedded at the hub for a total reduction of 400:1 [1]. Rim pull per wheel was designed to approach the full weight of the vehicle.

The first-iteration wheel is a tubeless rubber skid-loader tire on a machined hub, which the design team identified as a terrestrial stand-in for a metal flight wheel [1]. The majority of suspension components are machined 7075 aluminum, and the differencing linkage is carbon fiber composite.

The rover is radioisotope powered [4]. Power on the field vehicle comes from an electrical simulator of an Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator supplied by NASA GRC, which supports untethered operation for periods of time [1]. The vehicle has 24 V and 48 V buses with distributed motor controllers. The power system was designed around a persistent, low-capacity source rather than a peaky one, which is why the concept of operations serializes driving, drilling and battery charging rather than overlapping them.

Lunar surface rover concepts generally confront extreme temperature swings, dust and radiation alongside their terrain and delivery constraints [11]. A 2005 survey of exploration rover concepts concluded that modularity was the single most important factor for developing a viable surface mobility vehicle across missions [11]. The design environment is hard vacuum, 40 K ground temperature and a constant 3 K sky, with waste heat available from the radioisotope supply [1]. First-order thermal balance analysis indicated that the waste heat can hold electronics and other components in range but that excess heat must be shunted to a radiator surface, with a thermal management system to distribute heat and control temperatures and probably electrical heating of outboard components. Thermal paths to the drill and to any part of the vehicle holding icy soil have to be minimized so that volatile samples are preserved. The vehicle body is deliberately compact for thermal regulation [4].

A PC-104 computer with distributed motor controllers, wireless communication and wireless remote control. Much of the electronics is integrated to the chassis rather than to the body, which decouples it from the body structure and lets it dump heat into the central void of the rover.

Localization and navigation use wheel odometry, an inertial measurement unit, and terrain sensing by active devices, principally laser scanners, because there is no ambient light in a permanently shadowed crater [1], [4]. Wheel odometry and the inertial measurement unit estimate position and velocity in the dark. Flash and laser scanning systems were identified as the solutions that let the vehicle build terrain maps in permanent darkness. GPS was used for vehicle pose during early testing and afterwards as ground truth against which to evaluate the pose estimator.

Wireless communication and wireless remote control on the field vehicle [1]. No flight communications architecture is published.

Scarab is a drill carrier. The vehicle was sized around a drill of about 1 m length and about 3 cm diameter [4], and the mission requirement is 1 m geologic cores [1]. Drill thrust was expected to reach 100 to 200 N or more, and the vehicle has to supply enough weight on the lunar surface to react that thrust and the torque about the bit. That requirement, not the mobility requirement, set the vehicle mass.

Drilling for buried volatiles carries a loss risk of its own: thermal vacuum tests of the RESOLVE-lineage Honeybee Robotics Lunar Prospecting Drill found that roughly 30 percent of a sample’s water content was lost to sublimation during drilling and sample transfer, with loss decreasing at lower ambient temperature [7]. Moisture retention also correlated with sample size, with a larger sample losing proportionally less water [7].

The drill is mounted in line with the vehicle center of gravity, to maximize the weight available to react thrust, and bolted directly to a high-stiffness, high-strength chassis to maximize platform stability against thrust loads, torques and vibration [1]. The chassis is an aluminum weldment spanning between the suspension pairs, hollow at its center so that it wraps around the drill workspace. The structure supporting the drill continues upwards and doubles as the navigation sensor mast [4], a dual use that follows from the drill needing to be upright at a sampling site and the navigation mast needing to be upright while driving. A fixed drill structure was chosen over a deployable one for stiffness and to remove an actuation; a flight vehicle might need a single-use deployment depending on stowage.

The drill and the payload were external contributions: a breadboard coring drill and payload guidance from the RESOLVE team at NASA JSC and the Northern Centre for Advanced Technology, and rover sensing and navigation techniques co-developed with NASA Ames [1]. When the drill was not available Scarab carried a static stand-in replicating its mass properties.

Three ride-height poses are defined: low, nominal and high [1]. Low stance lowers the drill to the surface and gives the best static stability, 56 degrees pitch-over and 61 degrees roll-over, and high stance gives the most clearance at the cost of stability, 30 degrees pitch-over and 49 degrees roll-over. The mission cycle is drive, charge, drill, charge, repeat [4].

The design result that outlived the vehicle is the drill-driven chassis: a passive differenced rocker suspension for terrain conformance, with an independent active adjustment that changes ride height and wheelbase so the same structure that drives can be reconfigured into a stiff, low, heavily loaded drilling platform. The same combination of passive suspension with active adjustability had been used on NOMAD [9], and the resulting kinematics turned out very similar to NASA JPL Sample Return Rover, at a different scale [1]. NOMAD’s own most visible result was the first meteorite discoveries made by a robot, during a 2000 expedition to Elephant Moraine, Antarctica [9].

NASA’s Resource Prospector carried the same payload lineage forward. Its science premise was that LCROSS had confirmed water ice in a permanently shadowed region and indicated enough of it to be economically viable, and that RP would map the distribution at human scales of meters to kilometers and test whether areas of temporary sunlight also retain ice [6]. RP’s stated purpose was to ground-truth remotely sensed lunar water detections with a rover, drill and the RESOLVE science package, since only remote detection data existed before it [7]. RP was managed at Ames under the Advanced Exploration Systems division of the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate, as a Class D, Category 3 mission [8]. The mission concept had been publicly introduced since at least 2014 [5]. RESOLVE became the RP payload, and the work was split across three centers: the rover at NASA JSC, the project and mission operations lead at Ames, and payload integration and functional testing at NASA KSC, where most of the instrument suite was first mounted to a ground interface structure that replicated the rover payload bay before shipment to Johnson [12].

Published RP rover parameters [8]:

ParameterValue
Mass, including payload300 kg
Dimensions1.4 x 1.4 x 2 m, mast included
Speed made good0.5 cm/s
Power300 W, solar
Communicationsdirect to Earth
Surface duration6 to 14 Earth days
Launch vehicle and date, as plannedFalcon 9 v1.1, 2020

The prototype built in 2014 and 2015 is a solar-powered four-wheeled vehicle with hub motor drive, offset four-wheel steering and active suspension [8]. Active suspension changes ride height, lets the vehicle cross comparatively large obstacles and controls wheel loading; all-wheel steering lets the vehicle point arbitrarily while roving, for instance to hold the solar array on the sun while moving; and offset steering combined with active suspension improves driving in soft soil.

The mobility requirement came from the volatile distribution. The top 0.5 m is hypothesized to be patchy at 100 m scales because of impact gardening, and the mixing timescale increases with depth, so more mobility reduces the required sampling depth [8]. Minimum success was measurements from two places at least 100 m apart, which may require a 300 to 400 m path length; full success was two places at least 1000 m apart, needing a 3000 to 4000 m path, including measurement and sampling in a permanently shadowed area and an ISRU demonstration. About 60 to 70 craters of 10 m diameter form per square kilometer per billion years, and sampling at least ten of them was expected to need 2 to 3 km of traverse [8].

The rover payload was the Neutron Spectrometer System for resource localization, the Near Infrared Volatiles Spectrometer System for sample evaluation, the Lunar Advanced Volatile Analysis instrument for volatile content, the Oxygen and Volatile Extraction Node for extraction, and a drill and auger for subsurface sample collection, with a mast carrying communications antennae and navigation cameras and radiators for heat rejection [8].

RP flight software was built on NASA’s Core Flight Software: the core Flight Executive, an Operating System Abstraction Layer and cFE-compliant applications, chosen so that existing spacecraft functions could be reused while rover-specific applications were written against them [12]. The 2015 build 1 provided hardware interfaces, basic mobility, waypoint driving, odometry and inertial measurement unit localization, basic error checking and camera services [8]. The RP15 testbed was taken from concept to a rover driving in the lunar analog rock yard at Johnson within a single year. Operations were deliberately distributed rather than co-located, with each team working from its home center: driver and co-driver and the mission command position at Ames, rover systems at Johnson, and the payload at Kennedy, linked by a three-center operations platform with shared displays, CCSDS gateways and voice over IP commanding.

NASA KSC designed and fabricated the launch-lock hold-down mechanism that would have attached the rover to the lander through launch and transit and released it after touchdown, with an engineering development unit built and tested at KSC; deployment was to be down a ramp from the lander [10].

Prototype development matured RP subsystems to TRL 5, with radiation testing of avionics, thermal and thermal-vacuum testing of mechanisms and gravity-offload testing of mobility planned to follow [8]. The mission was later canceled. NASA’s next lunar volatile-prospecting rover mission, VIPER, carries the same goal forward with a rover built by a different team, to map ice stability regions from meters to kilometers across the lunar south pole [2].

References

  1. Bartlett, P., Wettergreen, D. and Whittaker, W. L. (2008). Design of the Scarab Rover for Mobility and Drilling in the Lunar Cold Traps . International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{bartlett2008design,
      title = {Design of the Scarab Rover for Mobility and Drilling in the Lunar Cold Traps},
      author = {Bartlett, Paul and Wettergreen, David and Whittaker, William L.},
      booktitle = {International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space},
      address = {Los Angeles, California},
      year = {2008},
      url = {https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/2008/2/08isairas.scarab.bartlett.pdf}
    }
  2. Colaprete, A. (2021). Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER) . NASA, 20210015009. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{colaprete2021volatiles,
      title = {Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER)},
      author = {Colaprete, Anthony},
      number = {20210015009},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {2021},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210015009},
      abstract = {VIPER is a lunar volatiles detection and measurement mission that will be launched as a payload on the CLPS (Commercial Lunar Payload Services) provided Astrobotic's Griffin lander to the lunar south polar region. VIPER includes a suite of rover-mounted instruments that will conduct science and map volatiles (especially hydrogen-bearing volatiles). The VIPER rover is also designed to excavate volatiles such as hydrogen, oxygen, and water from the Moon.
    After landing the VIPER rover will travel to investigate a range of Ice Stability Regions (ISRs) across scales from 100s of meters to kilometers and conduct surface and subsurface assessment of lunar water and other volatiles. The VIPER science mission team will use the instrument data to characterize the nature of the volatiles in the area and to extrapolate these data to create global lunar water resource maps. The expected lunar surface mission duration is up to four lunar days, with active surface operations during the periods when both Sun exposure and direct to Earth (DTE) communication conditions overlap. When comm and Sun are not both available, VIPER will go into ‘Safe Haven operations’ and maintain survival temperatures until Sun and comm return. The rover is controlled in near-real time and science decisions are made both tactically (short-term) and strategically (longer-term) to achieve the mission science success criteria and objectives.}
    }
  3. Daca, A., Skonieczny, K. and Moreland, S. (2022). Diagonal grousers improve turning performance in skid-steer rovers . Root. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{daca2022diagonal,
      title = {Diagonal grousers improve turning performance in skid-steer rovers},
      author = {Daca, Adriana and Skonieczny, Krzysztof and Moreland, Scott},
      journal = {Root},
      publisher = {JPL Open Repository},
      year = {2022},
      doi = {10.48577/jpl.surpxs},
      abstract = {Skid steering is a popular choice for planetary rover missions due to its simplicity, low cost, and low mass compared to explicit steering systems. Skid steer rovers’ wheels do not turn explicitly; vehicle turning is achieved by driving the left and right wheels at different velocities. To achieve a turn, the wheels must inherently experience a high amount of slip, which can lead to high sinkage. Furthermore, previous work has shown that sinkage can increase in reduced gravity environments. This work focuses on wheel design changes to reduce sinkage for a potential future lunar rover. The rover in question employs skid-steering, and prototype testing revealed significant sinkage during point turns (i.e. turn-in-place maneuvers). This was identified as a major issue since high sinkage leads to increased entrapment risk, decreased ground clearance, and increased power consumption. To investigate risk mitigation opportunities, seven additively manufactured wheels were tested in a single-wheel testbed capable of mimicking skid-steer maneuvers by setting a representative slip angle. To represent lunar gravity performance, the tests followed Granular Scaling Laws (a scaling method employing dimensionless numbers, recently validated against parabolic flight experiments and shown to predict wheel performance in lunar gravity with < 10% error). The seven wheel designs can be summarized as (1) current baseline: rigid 150 mm diameter, 30 mm wide wheel with 27x 8mm grousers, (2) wheel 1 with closed sides, (3) wheel 1 with closed sides and ‘side grousers’, (4) wheel 1 but 200 mm in diameter, (5) wheel 1 but 60 mm wide, (6) wheel 1 with 45 degree angled grousers, and (7) wheel 1 with a rounded profile. The metrics for turning performance evaluation were sinkage and tangent turning force coefficient. It was found that increasing the wheel size (width and/or diameter) had a positive effect on turning performance, but these changes would require mass/volume increases in an already mass/volume constrained application. Diagonal grousers also enhanced turning performance, and do not require mass or volume increases. While some of the other designs decreased sinkage, they had detrimental effects on the tangent turning force coefficient, and required an increase in mass and/or volume. Additional drawbar pull tests revealed that straight-driving performance was not significantly affected by the angled grousers. Next, the diagonal grouser wheel design will be tested on a full four-wheeled rover prototype to confirm these findings and determine if slope-climbing ability and obstacle-climbing ability are negatively impacted by this design.}
    }
  4. Fong, T., Bluethmann, W., Allan, M., Askew, S., Cannon, H., Deans, M., Fraser-Chanpong, N. and Markee, M. (2015). Development of the Resource Prospector Planetary Rover . Moon - : A New Era of Coordinated Human and Robotic Exploration. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{fong2015development,
      title = {Development of the Resource Prospector Planetary Rover},
      author = {Fong, Terrence and Bluethmann, William and Allan, Mark and Askew, Scott and Cannon, Howard and Deans, Matthew and Fraser-Chanpong, Nathan and Markee, Mason},
      booktitle = {Moon - : A New Era of Coordinated Human and Robotic Exploration},
      year = {2015},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190000455},
      abstract = {The Resource Prospector (RP) is an In-­‐Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) lunar rover mission under study by NASA. RP is planned to launch in 2020 to prospect for subsurface volatiles and to extract oxygen from lunar regolith. The mission will address several of NASA's "Strategic Knowledge Gaps" for lunar exploration. The mission will also address the Global Exploration Roadmap's strategic goal of using local resources for human exploration. The distribution of lunar subsurface volatiles drives the mission requirement for mobility. The spatial distribution is hypothesized to be governed by impact cratering with the top 0.5 m being patchy at scales of 100 m. The mixing time scale increases with depth (less frequent larger impacts). Consequently, increased mobility reduces the depth requirement for sampling. The target RP traverse will extend 1 km radially from the landing site to sample craters of varying sizes. Sampling craters with different ages will reveal possible volatile emplacement history. In 1 Ga, approximately 60-­70 craters of 10 m diameter form per km2. Thus, the rover will need to sample at least ten of these craters, which may require a total traverse path length of 2-­‐3 km. During 2014-­2015, we developed an initial prototype rover for RP. The current design is a solar powered, four-­wheeled vehicle, with hub motor drive, offset four wheel steering, and active suspension. Active suspension provides capabilities including changing vehicle ride height, traversing comparatively large obstacles, and controlling load on the wheels. All-­wheel steering enables the vehicle to point arbitrarily while roving, e.g., to keep the solar array pointed at the sun while in motion. The offset steering combined with active suspension improves driving in soft soil. The rover's on-­board software utilizes NASA's Core Flight Software, which is a reusable flight software environment. During 2015, we completed the initial rover software build, which provides low-­level hardware interfaces, basic mobility control, waypoint driving, odometry, basic error checking, and camera services. Development of the prototype rover has enabled maturation of many of the subsystems to TRL 5. During the next year, we will conduct integrated testing of concepts of operation, navigation, and remote driving tools. In addition, we will perform environmental tests including radiation (avionics), thermal and thermal/vacuum (mechanisms), and gravity offload (mobility).}
    }
  5. Fong, T. (2019). Overview of the Resource Prospector (RP) Mission . Lunar Exploration Symposium. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{fong2019overview,
      title = {Overview of the {Resource Prospector} ({RP}) Mission},
      author = {Fong, Terry},
      booktitle = {Lunar Exploration Symposium},
      organization = {NASA Technical Reports Server},
      year = {2019},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190001989},
      abstract = {This presentation describes the motivation, development, and key elements of the Resource Prospector lunar rover mission concept. This presentation is a modified version of Introducing the Resource Prospector (RP) Mission, which was presented by Dan Andrews at AIAA Space 2014.}
    }
  6. Kleinhenz, J. (2014). Lunar Polar Environmental Testing: Regolith Simulant Conditioning . Symposium on Space Resource Utilization, 20140012567. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{kleinhenz2014lunar,
      title = {Lunar Polar Environmental Testing: Regolith Simulant Conditioning},
      author = {Kleinhenz, Julie},
      booktitle = {Symposium on Space Resource Utilization},
      number = {20140012567},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {2014},
      doi = {10.2514/6.2014-0689},
      abstract = {As ISRU system development approaches flight fidelity, there is a need to test hardware in relevant environments. Extensive laboratory and field testing have involved relevant soil (lunar regolith simulants), but the current design iterations necessitate relevant pressure and temperature conditions. Including significant quantities of lunar regolith simulant in a thermal vacuum chamber poses unique challenges. These include facility operational challenges (dust tolerant hardware) and difficulty maintaining a pre-prepared soil state during pump down (consolidation state, moisture retention).For ISRU purposes, the regolith at the lunar poles will be of most interest due to the elevated water content. To test at polar conditions, the regolith simulant must be doped with water to an appropriate percentage and then chilled to cryogenic temperatures while exposed to vacuum conditions. A 1m tall, 28cm diameter bin of simulant was developed for testing these simulant preparation and drilling operations. The bin itself was wrapped with liquid nitrogen cooling loops (100K) so that the simulant bed reached an average temperature of 140K at vacuum. Post-test sampling was used to determine desiccation of the bed due to vacuum exposure. Depth dependent moisture data is presented from frozen and thawed soil samples.Following simulant only evacuation tests, drill hardware was incorporated into the vacuum chamber to test auguring techniques in the frozen soil at thermal vacuum conditions. The focus of this testing was to produce cuttings piles for a newly developed spectrometer to evaluate. This instrument, which is part of the RESOLVE program science hardware, detects water signatures from surface regolith. The drill performance, behavior of simulant during drilling, and characteristics of the cuttings piles will be offered.}
    }
  7. Kleinhenz, J. E., Paulsen, G., Zacny, K. and Smith, J. (2015). Impact of Drilling Operations on Lunar Volatiles Capture: Thermal Vacuum Tests . Glenn Research Center, 20150011440. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{kleinhenz2015impact,
      title = {Impact of Drilling Operations on Lunar Volatiles Capture: Thermal Vacuum Tests},
      author = {Kleinhenz, Julie E. and Paulsen, Gale and Zacny, Kris and Smith, Jim},
      number = {20150011440},
      institution = {Glenn Research Center},
      year = {2015},
      doi = {10.2514/6.2015-1177},
      abstract = {In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) enables future planetary exploration by using local resources to supply mission consumables. This idea of 'living off the land' has the potential to reduce mission cost and risk. On the moon, water has been identified as a potential resource (for life support or propellant) at the lunar poles, where it exists as ice in the subsurface. However, the depth and content of this resource has yet to be confirmed on the ground; only remote detection data exists. The upcoming Resource Prospector mission (RP) will 'ground-truth' the water using a rover, drill, and the RESOLVE science package. As the 2020 planned mission date nears, component level hardware is being tested in relevant lunar conditions (thermal vacuum). In August 2014 a series of drilling tests were performed using the Honeybee Robotics Lunar Prospecting Drill inside a 'dirty' thermal vacuum chamber at the NASA Glenn Research Center. The drill used a unique auger design to capture and retain the lunar regolith simulant. The goal of these tests was to investigate volatiles (water) loss during drilling and sample transfer to a sample crucible in order to validate this regolith sampling method. Twelve soil samples were captured over the course of two tests at pressures of 10(exp-5) Torr and ambient temperatures between -80C to -20C. Each sample was obtained from a depth of 40 cm to 50 cm within a cryogenically frozen bed of NU-LHT-3M lunar regolith simulant doped with 5 wt% water. Upon acquisition, each sample was transferred and hermetically sealed inside a crucible. The samples were later baked out to determine water wt% and in turn volatile loss by following ASTM standard practices. Of the twelve tests, four sealed properly and lost an average of 30% of their available water during drilling and transfer. The variability in the results correlated well with ambient temperature (lower the temperature lower volatiles loss) and the trend agreed with the sublimation rates for the same temperature. Moisture retention also correlated with quantity of sample: a larger amount of material resulted in less water loss. The drilling process took an average of 10 minutes to capture and transfer each sample. The drilling power was approximately 20 Watt with a Weight on Bit of approximately 30 N. The bit temperature indicated little heat input into formation during the drilling process.}
    }
  8. Tamasy, G. J., Smith, J. D., Mueller, R. P. and Townsend, I. I. (2015). Launch Lock Mechanism for Resource Prospector Rover . Earth and Space Conference. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{tamasy2015launch,
      title = {Launch Lock Mechanism for Resource Prospector Rover},
      author = {Tamasy, Gabor J. and Smith, Jonathan D. and Mueller, Robert P. and Townsend, Ivan I.},
      booktitle = {Earth and Space Conference},
      year = {2015},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150023111},
      abstract = {The Resource Prospector Rover is being designed to carry the RESOLVE (Regolith Environment Science, and Oxygen Lunar Volatile Extraction) payload on a mission to the Moon to prospect for water ice. This is a joint project between KSC Swamp Works UB-R1 and JSC. JSC is building the Resource Prospector 2015 (RP15) rover and KSC designed and fabricated a Launch-Lock (LL) hold down mechanism for the rover. The LL mechanism will attach and support the rover on a Lunar Lander during launch and transit to the moon, then release the RP15 rover after touchdown on the lunar surface. This report presents the design and development of the LL mechanism and its unique features which make it suitable for this lunar exploration mission. An EDU (engineering development unit) prototype of the LL has been built and tested at KSC which is the subject of this paper.}
    }
  9. Wagner, M. D., Apostolopoulos, D., Shillcutt, K., Shamah, B., Simmons, R. and Whittaker, W. (2001). The Science Autonomy System of the Nomad Robot . IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{wagner2001science,
      title = {The Science Autonomy System of the {Nomad} Robot},
      author = {Wagner, Michael D. and Apostolopoulos, Dimitrios and Shillcutt, Kimberly and Shamah, Benjamin and Simmons, Reid and Whittaker, William},
      booktitle = {IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation},
      volume = {2},
      pages = {1742--1749},
      year = {2001},
      doi = {10.1109/robot.2001.932862},
      abstract = {The Science Autonomy System (SAS) is a hierarchical control architecture for exploration and in situ science that integrates sensing, navigation, classification and mission planning. The Nomad robot demonstrated the capabilities of the SAS during a January 2000 expedition to Elephant Moraine, Antarctica where it accomplished the first meteorite discoveries made by a robot. In the paper, the structure and functionality of the three-tiered SAS are detailed. Results and lessons learned are presented with a focus on important future research.}
    }
  10. Wettergreen, D., Moreland, S., Skonieczny, K., Jonak, D., Kohanbash, D. and Teza, J. (2009). Design and Experimentation of a Rover Concept for Lunar Crater Resource Survey . AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{wettergreen2009design,
      title = {Design and Experimentation of a Rover Concept for Lunar Crater Resource Survey},
      author = {Wettergreen, David and Moreland, Scott and Skonieczny, Krzysztof and Jonak, Dominic and Kohanbash, David and Teza, James},
      booktitle = {AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition},
      year = {2009},
      doi = {10.2514/6.2009-1206},
      abstract = {Scarab is a prospecting rover for lunar missions to survey resources, particularly water ice, in polar craters. It is designed for the deployment of a deep coring drill and for transport of soil analysis instruments. Its chassis can transform to stabilize the drill in contact with the ground and can also adjust to ascend and descent steep slopes of unconsolidated soil. Additional features include a compact body for better thermal regulation, laser scanners for dark navigation, and power system designed for a persistent, low-capacity source. Scarab was prototyped at the Robotics Institute, has undergone mobility testing in soils laboratories and field sites leading up to an integrated system test including the RESOLVE drill and instrument suite at the PISCES lunar analogue site on Mauna Kea in Hawaii}
    }
  11. Zakrajsek, J. J., McKissock, D. B., Woytach, J. M., Zakrajsek, J. F., Oswald, F. B., McEntire, K. J., Hill, G. M., Abel, P., Eichenberg, D. J. and Goodnight, T. W. (2005). Exploration Rover Concepts and Development Challenges . Space Exploration Conference: Continuing the Voyage of Discovery, 20050175879. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{zakrajsek2005exploration,
      title = {Exploration Rover Concepts and Development Challenges},
      author = {Zakrajsek, James J. and McKissock, David B. and Woytach, Jeffrey M. and Zakrajsek, June F. and Oswald, Fred B. and McEntire, Kelly J. and Hill, Gerald M. and Abel, Phillip and Eichenberg, Dennis J. and Goodnight, Thomas W.},
      booktitle = {Space Exploration Conference: Continuing the Voyage of Discovery},
      number = {20050175879},
      institution = {NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory},
      year = {2005},
      doi = {10.2514/6.2005-2525},
      abstract = {This paper presents an overview of exploration rover concepts and the various development challenges associated with each as they are applied to exploration objectives and requirements for missions on the Moon and Mars. A variety of concepts for surface exploration vehicles have been proposed since the initial development of the Apollo-era lunar rover. This paper provides a brief description of the rover concepts, along with a comparison of their relative benefits and limitations. In addition, this paper outlines, and investigates a number of critical development challenges that surface exploration vehicles must address in order to successfully meet the exploration mission vision. These include: mission and environmental challenges, design challenges, and production and delivery challenges. Mission and environmental challenges include effects of terrain, extreme temperature differentials, dust issues, and radiation protection. Design methods are discussed that focus on optimum methods for developing highly reliable, long-life and efficient systems. In addition, challenges associated with delivering a surface exploration system is explored and discussed. Based on all the information presented, modularity will be the single most important factor in the development of a truly viable surface mobility vehicle. To meet mission, reliability, and affordability requirements, surface exploration vehicles, especially pressurized rovers, will need to be modularly designed and deployed across all projected Moon and Mars exploration missions.}
    }
  12. (2026). Carnegie Mellon Field Robotics Center: Scarab. frc.ri.cmu.edu/lri/scarab/index.html
    BibTeX
    @misc{carnegiemellonfieldroboticscenterscarab,
      title = {Carnegie Mellon Field Robotics Center: Scarab},
      organization = {frc.ri.cmu.edu},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://frc.ri.cmu.edu/lri/scarab/index.html}
    }