Testing
Verification methods, facilities, and simulants used to qualify robotic hardware for environments that cannot be reproduced in full on Earth. Each page covers what the method reproduces, what it does not, the fidelity limits that have caused flight surprises, and the facilities where the work is done.
Ground qualification is checked against the flight it was predicting only rarely, and the matched cases are specific rather than general. Curiosity’s accumulated flight thermal cycles have been rainflow counted against the accelerated cycling test run on the same board design [1]. The MSL generator’s output was measured against its pre-flight prediction at three points before launch and once on the surface [2]. Mast pointing accuracy achieved on Mars was carried into the Mars 2020 requirement as an operational figure with outliers rather than as the ground expectation it replaced [3].
Facility capability parameters have almost no counterpart of that kind. Chamber base pressure, bed density and preparation state, slope, illumination and gravity offload fidelity are published as what a rig delivers to an article standing on or inside it, and none of them is re-measured on the hardware once it is working in the place the rig stood in for. A facility envelope is therefore a capability statement and not an error bar against flight, and most stated fidelity limits are arguments from physics rather than measured discrepancies.
Two thermal vacuum cases are the exception, and both are on flight vehicles. The Mars 2020 system thermal vacuum test concluded that a cruise thruster catalyst bed heater could stay on continuously from launch, which flight contradicted, because the chamber simulated no off-Sun angle flux [4]. Perseverance’s correlated thermal model inherited the 4 percent voltage loss of the ground support equipment cabling in place of the 9 percent of the flight flex cables, which produced preheat ramp rate errors above 5 C in flight until the cable loss was corrected [5]. Both are covered on thermal vacuum testing.
References
- Berger, L. N. and Bell, C. (2020). Comparing Cumulative Flight Thermal Fatigue to Ground Test Results for Memory Components on the Mars Curiosity Rover
. AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{berger2020comparing, title = {Comparing Cumulative Flight Thermal Fatigue to Ground Test Results for Memory Components on the Mars Curiosity Rover}, author = {Berger, Lindsey N and Bell, Charles}, booktitle = {AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition}, publisher = {JPL Open Repository}, year = {2020}, url = {https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:2014/52311} } - Woerner, D., Moreno, V., Jones, L., Zimmerman, R. and Wood, E. (2012). The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) MMRTG In-Flight : a power update
. Biennial ASCE Aerospace Division International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{woerner2012mars, title = {The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) MMRTG In-Flight : a power update}, author = {Woerner, David and Moreno, Victor and Jones, Loren and Zimmerman, Robert and Wood, Eric}, booktitle = {Biennial ASCE Aerospace Division International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments}, publisher = {JPL Open Repository}, year = {2012}, url = {https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:2014/43175} } - Maurice, S., Wiens, R. C., Bernardi, P., Caïs, P., Robinson, S. H., Nelson, T., Gasnault, O., Reess, J.-M., Deleuze, M., Rull, F., Manrique, J. A., Abbaki, S., Anderson, R. B., André, Y., Angel, S., Arana, G., Battault, T., Beck, P., Benzerara, K., Bernard, S., Berthias, J.-P., Beyssac, O., Bonafous, M., Bousquet, B., Boutillier, M., Cadu, A., Castro, K., Chapron, F., Chide, B., Clark, K., Clavé, E., Clegg, S., Cloutis, E., Collin, C., Cordoba, E. C., Cousin, A., Dameury, J.-C., D'Anna, W., Daydou, Y., Debus, A., Deflores, L., Dehouck, E., Delapp, D., De Los Santos, G., Donny, C., Doressoundiram, A., Dromart, G., Dubois, B., Dufour, A., Dupieux, M., Egan, M., Ervin, J., Fabre, C., Fau, A., Fischer, W., Forni, O., Fouchet, T., Frydenvang, J., Gauffre, S., Gauthier, M., Gharakanian, V., Gilard, O., Gontijo, I., Gonzalez, R., Granena, D., Grotzinger, J., Hassen-Khodja, R., Heim, M., Hello, Y., Hervet, G., Humeau, O., Jacob, X., Jacquinod, S., Johnson, J. R., Kouach, D., Lacombe, G., Lanza, N., Lapauw, L., Laserna, J., Lasue, J., Le Deit, L., Le Mouélic, S., Le Comte, E., Lee, Q.-M., Legett, I. C., Leveille, R., Lewin, E., Leyrat, C., Lopez-Reyes, G., Lorenz, R., Lucero, B., Madariaga, J. M., Madsen, S., Madsen, M., Mangold, N., Manni, F., Mariscal, J.-F., Martinez-Frias, J., Mathieu, K., Mathon, R., McCabe, K. P., McConnochie, T., McLennan, S. M., Mekki, J., Melikechi, N., Meslin, P.-Y., Micheau, Y., Michel, Y., Michel, J. M., Mimoun, D., Misra, A., Montagnac, G., Montaron, C., Montmessin, F., Moros, J., Mousset, V., Morizet, Y., Murdoch, N., Newell, R. T., Newsom, H., Nguyen Tuong, N., Ollila, A. M., Orttner, G., Oudda, L., Pares, L., Parisot, J., Parot, Y., Pérez, R., Pheav, D., Picot, L., Pilleri, P., Pilorget, C., Pinet, P., Pont, G., Poulet, F., Quantin-Nataf, C., Quertier, B., Rambaud, D., Rapin, W., Romano, P., Roucayrol, L., Royer, C., Ruellan, M., Sandoval, B., Sautter, V., Schoppers, M. J., Schröder, S., Seran, H.-C., Sharma, S. K., Sobron, P., Sodki, M., Sournac, A., Sridhar, V., Standarovsky, D., Storms, S., Striebig, N., Tatat, M., Toplis, M., Torre-Fdez, I., Toulemont, N., Velasco, C., Veneranda, M., Venhaus, D., Virmontois, C., Viso, M., Willis, P. and Wong, K. (2021). The SuperCam Instrument Suite on the Mars 2020 Rover: Science Objectives and Mast-Unit Description
. Space Science Reviews, 47. Source
BibTeX
@article{maurice2021supercam, title = {The SuperCam Instrument Suite on the Mars 2020 Rover: Science Objectives and Mast-Unit Description}, author = {Maurice, Sylvestre and Wiens, Roger C. and Bernardi, Pernelle and Caïs, Phillippe and Robinson, Scott H. and Nelson, Tony and Gasnault, Olivier and Reess, Jean-Michel and Deleuze, Muriel and Rull, Fernando and Manrique, Jose Antonio and Abbaki, Sadok and Anderson, Ryan B. and André, Yves and Angel, S.M. and Arana, Gorka and Battault, T. and Beck, Pierre and Benzerara, Karim and Bernard, Sylvain and Berthias, J.-P. and Beyssac, Olivier and Bonafous, Marion and Bousquet, Bruno and Boutillier, M. and Cadu, A. and Castro, Kepa and Chapron, Frédéric and Chide, Baptiste and Clark, K. and Clavé, Elise and Clegg, S. and Cloutis, E. and Collin, Claude and Cordoba, Elizabeth C. and Cousin, A. and Dameury, J.-C. and D'Anna, W. and Daydou, Yves and Debus, Andre and Deflores, Lauren and Dehouck, Erwin and Delapp, Dorothea and De Los Santos, Greg and Donny, C. and Doressoundiram, Alain and Dromart, Gilles and Dubois, Bruno and Dufour, A. and Dupieux, M. and Egan, Miles and Ervin, Joan and Fabre, C. and Fau, Amaury and Fischer, Woodward and Forni, Olivier and Fouchet, Thierry and Frydenvang, Jens and Gauffre, S. and Gauthier, M. and Gharakanian, V. and Gilard, Olivier and Gontijo, Ivair and Gonzalez, R. and Granena, D. and Grotzinger, J. and Hassen-Khodja, Rafik and Heim, M. and Hello, Y. and Hervet, G. and Humeau, Olivier and Jacob, Xavier and Jacquinod, Sophie and Johnson, Jeffrey R. and Kouach, Driss and Lacombe, G. and Lanza, Nina and Lapauw, Laurent and Laserna, Javier and Lasue, J. and Le Deit, Laetitia and Le Mouélic, Stéphane and Le Comte, E. and Lee, Qiu-Mei and Legett, IV, C. and Leveille, Richard and Lewin, Eric and Leyrat, C. and Lopez-Reyes, Guillermo and Lorenz, R. and Lucero, Briana and Madariaga, Juan Manuel and Madsen, Soren and Madsen, M. and Mangold, N. and Manni, F. and Mariscal, J.-F. and Martinez-Frias, Jesus and Mathieu, K. and Mathon, R. and McCabe, Kevin P. and McConnochie, T. and McLennan, Scott M. and Mekki, J. and Melikechi, Noureddine and Meslin, Pierre-Yves and Micheau, Y. and Michel, Y. and Michel, John M. and Mimoun, David and Misra, A. and Montagnac, Gilles and Montaron, Christophe and Montmessin, Franck and Moros, J. and Mousset, V. and Morizet, Y. and Murdoch, Naomi and Newell, Raymond T. and Newsom, Horton and Nguyen Tuong, N. and Ollila, Ann M. and Orttner, G. and Oudda, L. and Pares, Laurent and Parisot, Jérôme and Parot, Yann and Pérez, René and Pheav, D. and Picot, L. and Pilleri, Paolo and Pilorget, C. and Pinet, P. and Pont, Gabriel and Poulet, F. and Quantin-Nataf, Cathy and Quertier, Benjamin and Rambaud, D. and Rapin, William and Romano, P. and Roucayrol, L. and Royer, C. and Ruellan, M. and Sandoval, B.F. and Sautter, Violaine and Schoppers, Marcel J. and Schröder, S. and Seran, H.-C. and Sharma, Shiv K. and Sobron, Pablo and Sodki, M. and Sournac, A. and Sridhar, Vishnu and Standarovsky, D. and Storms, Steven and Striebig, Nicolas and Tatat, M. and Toplis, M. and Torre-Fdez, Imanol and Toulemont, N. and Velasco, C. and Veneranda, Marco and Venhaus, Dawn and Virmontois, C. and Viso, M. and Willis, P. and Wong, K.W.}, journal = {Space Science Reviews}, volume = {217}, number = {47}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1007/s11214-021-00807-w}, abstract = {Abstract On the NASA 2020 rover mission to Jezero crater, the remote determination of the texture, mineralogy and chemistry of rocks is essential to quickly and thoroughly characterize an area and to optimize the selection of samples for return to Earth. As part of the Perseverance payload, SuperCam is a suite of five techniques that provide critical and complementary observations via Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS), Time-Resolved Raman and Luminescence (TRR/L), visible and near-infrared spectroscopy (VISIR), high-resolution color imaging (RMI), and acoustic recording (MIC). SuperCam operates at remote distances, primarily 2–7 m, while providing data at sub-mm to mm scales. We report on SuperCam’s science objectives in the context of the Mars 2020 mission goals and ways the different techniques can address these questions. The instrument is made up of three separate subsystems: the Mast Unit is designed and built in France; the Body Unit is provided by the United States; the calibration target holder is contributed by Spain, and the targets themselves by the entire science team. This publication focuses on the design, development, and tests of the Mast Unit; companion papers describe the other units. The goal of this work is to provide an understanding of the technical choices made, the constraints that were imposed, and ultimately the validated performance of the flight model as it leaves Earth, and it will serve as the foundation for Mars operations and future processing of the data.} } - Miller, J. R., Singh, K., Reilly, S., Novak, K. and Lyra, J. (2022). Mars 2020 System Thermal Vacuum (STV) Test Implementation and Results
. Root. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{miller2022mars, title = {Mars 2020 System Thermal Vacuum (STV) Test Implementation and Results}, author = {Miller, Jennifer R. and Singh, Kaustabh and Reilly, Sean and Novak, Keith and Lyra, Jackie}, journal = {Root}, publisher = {JPL Open Repository}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.48577/jpl.uhmv4z}, abstract = {No abstract available.} } - Cassler, B., Nelson, E. J. and Kempenaar, J. G. (2023). Thermal Performance of the Perseverance Rover During Mars Surface Operations
. International Conference on Environmental Systems. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{cassler2023thermal, title = {Thermal Performance of the Perseverance Rover During Mars Surface Operations}, author = {Cassler, Bailey and Nelson, Emma J. and Kempenaar, Jason G.}, booktitle = {International Conference on Environmental Systems}, publisher = {JPL Open Repository}, year = {2023}, doi = {10.48577/jpl.uajl0t}, abstract = {On July 30, 2020, NASA launched the Perseverance Rover as part of the Mars 2020 (M2020) mission to Mars. On February 18, 2021, the rover landed on the surface of Mars in Jezero Crater at a latitude of 18.5°N. As of the writing of this paper, the rover has completed over 700 sols of surface operations, more than one full Martian year on the surface. Landing occurred during the Martian spring (Ls=5), and the rover has since operated through the summer, fall, and winter seasons. While the rover was originally designed to support a surface mission of 1003 sols, Perseverance has been integrated as part of the planned Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign to bring samples back from the surface of Mars to Earth for the first time. Understanding the thermal performance of the rover will be essential to ensuring the longevity of Perseverance to perform this mission. This paper discusses the thermal performance of the rover from landing to present day, including predicted versus actual thermal performance, nominal operations, incidents and anomalies, and long-term trending data that will be used to improve energy usage for activities requiring thermal support in the future.} }