TAGSAM
Program pages NASA: OSIRIS-REx
Erika Blumenfeld & Joseph Aebers. Public domain (NASA / US government work).
Overview
Section titled “Overview”TAGSAM is the sampling mechanism carried by OSIRIS-REx. It is an articulated arm ending in an annular collection head that contacts the surface for a few seconds, releases nitrogen gas into the regolith beneath it, and captures the fluidized material in an internal reservoir [1].
Specifications
Section titled “Specifications”| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Arm extension from the spacecraft | 2.8 m | [1] |
| Wrist articulation | 15 deg in any direction, compliant U-joint | [1], [2] |
| Head height | about 7 cm | [2] |
| Head base plate diameter | 32 cm | [2] |
| Head opening diameter | 21 cm | [2] |
| Contact pad samplers | 24 pads of about 1.75 cm diameter, stainless steel Velcro loop, 57.42 cm2 total, encircling the base plate as a backup sampler and as a record of material exposed at the surface | [1], [2], [6] |
| Contact pad grain capture | up to 1 mm diameter [1] | [1] |
| Bulk capture particle limit | about 2 cm | [1], [2] |
| Nitrogen bottles | 3, independently controlled, 3 possible attempts | [1], [2] |
| Gas release timing | 1 s after contact | [2] |
| Contact duration | up to 8 s on a soft surface | [1] |
| Head collection chamber capacity | at least 150 g | [7] |
| Demonstrated ground and parabolic collection | over 600 g | [1] |
Mission profile
Section titled “Mission profile”| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Host | OSIRIS-REx | [1] |
| Target | asteroid Bennu | [1] |
| Contact site | Nightingale, in the 20 m Hokioi crater | [2] |
| Contact date | 20 October 2020 | [2] |
| Sample return capsule landing | Utah Test and Training Range, 24 September 2023 | [2], [7] |
| Sample requirement | 60 g bulk plus 26 cm2 of fine-grained contact pad material | [1], [7] |
Mechanism
Section titled “Mechanism”The head is a simple annulus with a wire mesh filter screen around its outer circumference [1]. There is no digging tool and no closing jaw. Nitrogen injected into the interior of the annulus entrains fines and pebbles up to 2 cm [1] and, if the head is firmly seated, the only path for gas and entrained regolith is through the filter, where the material is retained. A compressible constant-force spring in the forearm buffers the contact dynamics [2].

Cross-section of the collection head with its dimensions and gas path. Nitrogen enters through the central manifold and exits at the outer rim, so once the head is seated on the surface the only route out for gas and entrained regolith is through the filter, where the material is retained. Source: [2]. CC BY 4.0.
The architecture follows from the force scaling at asteroid gravity. Cohesion between grains exceeds their weight over most of the relevant particle size range, and gravity provides no useful normal force for a tool to react against [5]. Gas transfers momentum to the regolith without the spacecraft having to react a digging load, which is what makes collection possible without landing.
The 15 deg wrist compliance was allocated as a hard constraint on site selection: the mission requirement capped facet tilt at 14 deg, with the remaining 1 deg reserved for other error sources [2].
Descent and contact sequence
Section titled “Descent and contact sequence”| Event | Parameter |
|---|---|
| Departure orbit | 1 km |
| Checkpoint burn | Places the spacecraft on an intersecting trajectory at 16 cm/s approach |
| Checkpoint to Matchpoint | About 600 s |
| Matchpoint altitude | 55 m |
| Contact velocity target | 10 cm/s vertical, zero lateral to +/- 2 cm/s |
| Back-away burn | 0.7 m/s |
| Delivery requirement | Head within 25 m of the aim point at over 98 percent probability |
Source: [1].
Trajectory dispersion after the deorbit burn is too large for predefined Checkpoint and Matchpoint maneuvers, so the spacecraft state is updated onboard at Checkpoint and both burns are adjusted autonomously [1]. Two independent guidance methods were carried. LIDAR-guided TAG detects a range-threshold crossing and takes a range measurement at a fixed time to correct the maneuvers. Natural Feature Tracking renders features from an onboard shape model built in flight, using predicted camera pointing and Sun position, and correlates them against live imagery to produce a position and velocity update relative to the surface. During contact the reaction wheels and attitude control thrusters are enabled to damp imparted torques and keep any part of the spacecraft other than the head off the surface. The solar arrays are moved into a Y-wing configuration for sampling, to keep dust off the cells and increase ground clearance if the spacecraft rotates on contact.
What the contact measured
Section titled “What the contact measured”The touchdown is the only direct measurement of the geotechnical properties of a rubble pile near subsurface. The arm spring took no compression, so the load path from the head to the spacecraft inertial measurement unit was rigid and the 200 Hz accelerometer record is a force record, with the contact measurements below [3].
| Quantity | Measured value |
|---|---|
| Contact velocity | 10 cm/s, negligible lateral |
| Peak acceleration before gas release | 0.014 m/s2 |
| Peak contact force | 10 to 15 N |
| Depth at 1.2 s | 2 to 3 cm |
| Depth at end of the pre-gas interval | 5.95 to 6.91 cm in 0.605 to 0.705 s |
| Head tilt taken up by a 5 cm rock | about 7 deg |
| Disturbed area | 0.51 m2 against a 0.08 m2 footprint |
| Derived near-subsurface bulk density | 440 to 600 kg/m3 |
| Derived packing fraction | 0.2 to 0.45 |
| Derived compressive strength | 2 to 200 Pa |
| Derived bulk cohesion | 0.2 to 20 Pa |
No initial acceleration spike appeared, which is the signature of granular impact in the laboratory; the rise was gradual because contact was off-center against a 5 cm rock that tilted the head [3]. A 40 cm rock was levered upward and millimeter debris was lofted from its surface under weak forces, which itself argues for minimal cohesive bonding.
Interpretation runs through a modified granular intrusion force law with a quasi-static term F_pressure = 80 mu rho a^2 g |z| and an inertial term F_drag = 3.2 rho a^2 U^2 [4]. For weakly cohesive regolith the response splits on packing fraction: at or below about 0.5 the force stays under about 60 N and is drag dominated, while at or above 0.6 the force exceeds 60 N for friction angle above 20 deg and penetration stops within a few centimeters above 30 deg [3], [4]. The measured 10 to 15 N places Bennu firmly in the loose regime.
Site selection
Section titled “Site selection”Bennu was found to have no ponded deposits of particles small enough to sample, which is the surface type the mechanism had been designed against [2]. The mission requirement was a site with at least 80 percent probability of acquiring at least 60 g per attempt. Meeting it after arrival required a sampleability algorithm fitted to ground test results relating collection mass to observable surface properties.
Three map products drove the decision: a deliverability map giving navigation precision to a target point, a safety map identifying boulders that could endanger the spacecraft, and a sampleability map [2]. Particle mapping had to resolve grains at or below the 21 cm head opening, against an imaging requirement to cover more than 80 percent of the surface at better than 21 cm resolution. Reconnaissance flybys at 250 to 350 m produced pixel scales below 2 cm, and digital terrain models were built at 2 cm facet spacing, comparable to the 32 cm head diameter [2]. A sequence of TAG rehearsals was flown after site selection, each demonstrating one step of the collection sequence before the flight system was committed to the surface [7].
Contact itself was triggered by a compression indicator on the arm, with the guidance LIDAR taking the spacecraft to about 5 m before the final approach [7].
At the actual contact point, latitude 55.9 deg and longitude 41.8 deg, particle mapping found a minimum particle size of 7.65 mm and a size-frequency distribution power law slope of -2.09 +/- 0.008 over 521 particles within a 1.5 m radius [2]. Rock tilt efficiency was 0.434 because a rock larger than the 21 cm opening overlapped the sampling location. Predicted collection ranged from 32.4 g using resolved particles only under low-mobility scoring to 249.9 g including unresolved material under high-mobility scoring [2]. Imagery during the event showed the head flush with the surface with no effective tilt, which raises the tilt efficiency to 1.0 and the predictions to 258 g and 575 g.
The lesson recorded by the team is that the site choice depended on data that could only be obtained after arrival: Nightingale and Osprey diverged in their fraction of unresolved facets only as progressively finer imagery was analyzed, and an earlier decision on lower-resolution imagery could have selected a different site [2].
Sample mass measurement and stowage
Section titled “Sample mass measurement and stowage”Collected mass was determined from the change in spacecraft moment of inertia, with the arm extended along the spacecraft X axis and the measurement compared against an identical one made before contact [1]. SamCam then refocused through a diopter lens in its filter wheel to image the head and contact pads at a range of incidence and emission angles for visual verification. In parallel [1], the contact force profile was reconstructed from OCAMS, TAGCAMS and guidance telemetry, incorporating head motion and forearm pogo spring compression, and matched against an atlas of discrete element simulation outcomes calibrated on 1 g and microgravity low-velocity impact experiments.
Enough material entered the reservoir that the retaining flap jammed open and particles escaped, and stowage was advanced ahead of schedule [8]. The bulk sample collected was estimated from imaging at 250 plus or minus 101 g, against a mission requirement of at least 60 g [1], [6].
Return
Section titled “Return”| Event | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Bennu departure | March 2021, 931 days after arrival | [7] |
| Capsule mass | 46 kg | [1] |
| Capsule dimensions | 81 cm diameter, 50 cm tall | [1] |
| Capsule release | 4 h before entry interface | [7] |
| Entry velocity | 12.2 km/s | [7] |
| Entry flight path angle | -8.2 deg | [7] |
| Kinetic energy removed by the aeroshell | over 99 percent | [7] |
| Sample temperature limit through entry | below 75 C | [7] |
| Drogue deployment | Mach 1.4 at about 30 to 33 km | [1], [7] |
| Main chute deployment | about 3 km | [1], [7] |
| Terminal descent speed | 4.6 m/s | [1] |
| Riser cutter trigger | 10 g switch at ground impact | [1] |
The capsule is a Stardust-derived blunt-nosed cone with a PICA heat shield [1], [7]. The Stardust aerogel grid was replaced by a capture ring that locks the TAGSAM head during stowage [1]. Two backshell vents allow depressurization on ascent and repressurization on descent.
Contamination control
Section titled “Contamination control”Sensitive surfaces were held to IEST-STD-CC1246D level 100A/2, and TAGSAM and capsule cleanliness was monitored so that no surface accumulated more than 180 ng/cm2 of total amino acids and hydrazine [1]. Over 300 material coupons and an extensive witness plate catalog were collected through assembly, test and launch operations and archived at NASA JSC, with further witness plates mounted on the mechanism and capsule to record in-flight contamination.
Curation and allocation
Section titled “Curation and allocation”The sample canister was purged with high-purity gaseous nitrogen inside a temporary ISO 7 cleanroom at the Utah Test and Training Range, then flown to Ellington Field and trucked to NASA JSC under a continuous nitrogen purge, planned for the day after recovery [6]. Disassembly and curation use four custom nitrogen gloveboxes in an ISO 5 cleanroom, certified in November 2021 and held at 22 C plus or minus 1 C: one for the capsule canister, one for disassembly of the TAGSAM head, one for the contact pads and one for the witness plates. The catalog was to be released in late March 2024, about six months after return, with up to 25 percent by mass allocated to the science team for early analysis [6].
The 24 contact pads are a distinct sample stream from the bulk reservoir: they were designed both as a backup should regolith fail to mobilize into the chamber and to capture material exposed at the surface for direct comparison against the spacecraft’s remote sensing, and they are removed and processed in their own glovebox [6].
Radiation
Section titled “Radiation”No TAGSAM-specific radiation design data is published. The interplanetary environment the mechanism was exposed to over seven years is that of the Badhwar-O’Neill galactic cosmic ray model, with solar modulation derived from time-delayed sunspot number [9].
Technologies developed
Section titled “Technologies developed”Touch-and-go sampling with onboard hazard-relative guidance is now the reference approach for small-body sample return [1], [8]. The Natural Feature Tracking implementation, an onboard shape model correlated against live imagery to produce a surface-relative state update, was flown here for the first time on an asteroid approach and is the direct antecedent of terrain-relative navigation on later small-body missions [1]. The contact itself produced the granular force law calibration that any successor sampler will be sized against [3], [4].
References
- Lauretta, D., Balram-Knutson, S., Beshore, E., Boynton, W., Drouet d'Aubigny, C., DellaGiustina, D., Enos, H., Gholish, D., Hergenrother, C., Howell, E., Johnson, C., Morton, E., Nolan, M., Rizk, B., Roper, H., Bartels, A., Bos, B., Dworkin, J., Highsmith, D., Lorenz, D., Lim, L., Mink, R., Moreau, M., Nuth, J., Reuter, D., Simon, A., Bierhaus, E., Bryan, B., Ballouz, R., Barnouin, O., Binzel, R., Bottke, W., Hamilton, V., Walsh, K., Chesley, S., Christensen, P., Clark, B., Connolly, H., Crombie, M., Daly, M., Emery, J., McCoy, T., McMahon, J., Scheeres, D., Messenger, S., Nakamura-Messenger, K., Righter, K. and Sandford, S. (2017). OSIRIS-REx: Sample Return from Asteroid (101955) Bennu. Space Science Reviews. Source
BibTeX
@article{lauretta2017osiris, title = {OSIRIS-REx: Sample Return from Asteroid (101955) Bennu}, author = {Lauretta, D.S. and Balram-Knutson, S.S. and Beshore, E. and Boynton, W.V. and Drouet d'Aubigny, C. and DellaGiustina, D.N. and Enos, H.L. and Gholish, D.R. and Hergenrother, C.W. and Howell, E.S. and Johnson, C.A. and Morton, E.T. and Nolan, M.C. and Rizk, B. and Roper, H.L. and Bartels, A.E. and Bos, B.J. and Dworkin, J.P. and Highsmith, D.E. and Lorenz, D.A. and Lim, L.F. and Mink, R. and Moreau, M.C. and Nuth, J.A. and Reuter, D.C. and Simon, A.A. and Bierhaus, E.B. and Bryan, B.H. and Ballouz, R. and Barnouin, O.S. and Binzel, R.P. and Bottke, W.F. and Hamilton, V.E. and Walsh, K.J. and Chesley, S.R. and Christensen, P.R. and Clark, B.E. and Connolly, H.C. and Crombie, M.K. and Daly, M.G. and Emery, J.P. and McCoy, T.J. and McMahon, J.W. and Scheeres, D.J. and Messenger, S. and Nakamura-Messenger, K. and Righter, K. and Sandford, S.A.}, journal = {Space Science Reviews}, volume = {212}, pages = {925--984}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1007/s11214-017-0405-1} } - Walsh, K. J., Bierhaus, E. B., Lauretta, D. S., Nolan, M. C., Ballouz, R.-L., Bennett, C. A., Jawin, E. R., Barnouin, O. S., Berry, K., Burke, K. N., Brodbeck, B., Burns, R., Clark, B. C., Clark, B. E., Cambioni, S., Connolly, J. H. C., Daly, M. G., Delbo, M., DellaGiustina, D. N., Dworkin, J. P., Enos, H. L., Emery, J. P., Gay, P., Golish, D. R., Hamilton, V. E., Hoover, R., Lujan, M., McCoy, T., Mink, R. G., Moreau, M. C., Nolau, J., Padilla, J., Pajola, M., Polit, A. T., Robbins, S. J., Ryan, A. J., Selznick, S. H., Stewart, S. and Wolner, C. W. (2022). Assessing the Sampleability of Bennu's Surface for the OSIRIS-REx Asteroid Sample Return Mission. Space Science Reviews, 20. Source
BibTeX
@article{walsh2022assessing, title = {Assessing the Sampleability of Bennu's Surface for the OSIRIS-REx Asteroid Sample Return Mission}, author = {Walsh, Kevin J. and Bierhaus, Edward B. and Lauretta, Dante S. and Nolan, Michael C. and Ballouz, Ronald-Louis and Bennett, Carina A. and Jawin, Erica R. and Barnouin, Olivier S. and Berry, Kevin and Burke, Keara N. and Brodbeck, Bella and Burns, Rich and Clark, Benton C. and Clark, Beth E. and Cambioni, Saverio and Connolly, Jr., Harold C. and Daly, Michael G. and Delbo, Marco and DellaGiustina, Daniella N. and Dworkin, Jason P. and Enos, Heather L. and Emery, Josh P. and Gay, Pamela and Golish, Dathon R. and Hamilton, Victoria E. and Hoover, Rachel and Lujan, Michael and McCoy, Timothy and Mink, Ronald G. and Moreau, Michael C. and Nolau, Jennifer and Padilla, Jacob and Pajola, Maurizio and Polit, Anjani T. and Robbins, Stuart J. and Ryan, Andrew J. and Selznick, Sanford H. and Stewart, Stephanie and Wolner, Catherine W.V.}, journal = {Space Science Reviews}, volume = {218}, number = {20}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1007/s11214-022-00887-2} } - Walsh, K. J., Ballouz, R.-L., Jawin, E. R., Avdellidou, C., Barnouin, O. S., Bennett, C. A., Bierhaus, E. B., Bos, B. J., Cambioni, S., Connolly, J. H. C., Delbo, M., DellaGiustina, D. N., DeMartini, J., Emery, J. P., Golish, D. R., Haas, P. C., Hergenrother, C. W., Ma, H., Michel, P., Nolan, M. C., Olds, R., Rozitis, B., Richardson, D. C., Rizk, B., Ryan, A. J., Sánchez, P., Scheeres, D. J., Schwartz, S. R., Selznick, S. H., Zhang, Y. and Lauretta, D. S. (2022). Near-zero cohesion and loose packing of Bennu's near subsurface revealed by spacecraft contact. Science Advances, 27. Source
BibTeX
@article{walsh2022near, title = {Near-zero cohesion and loose packing of Bennu's near subsurface revealed by spacecraft contact}, author = {Walsh, Kevin J. and Ballouz, Ronald-Louis and Jawin, Erica R. and Avdellidou, Chrysa and Barnouin, Olivier S. and Bennett, Carina A. and Bierhaus, Edward B. and Bos, Brent J. and Cambioni, Saverio and Connolly, Jr., Harold C. and Delbo, Marco and DellaGiustina, Daniella N. and DeMartini, Joseph and Emery, Joshua P. and Golish, Dathon R. and Haas, Patrick C. and Hergenrother, Carl W. and Ma, Huikang and Michel, Patrick and Nolan, Michael C. and Olds, Ryan and Rozitis, Benjamin and Richardson, Derek C. and Rizk, Bashar and Ryan, Andrew J. and Sánchez, Paul and Scheeres, Daniel J. and Schwartz, Stephen R. and Selznick, Sanford H. and Zhang, Yun and Lauretta, Dante S.}, journal = {Science Advances}, volume = {8}, number = {27}, pages = {eabm6229}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.1126/sciadv.abm6229} } - Ballouz, R.-L., Walsh, K., Sánchez, P., Holsapple, K., Michel, P., Scheeres, D., Zhang, Y., Richardson, D., Barnouin, O., Nolan, M., Bierhaus, E., Connolly, J. H., Schwartz, S., Çelik, O., Baba, M. and Lauretta, D. (2021). Modified granular impact force laws for the OSIRIS-REx touchdown on the surface of asteroid (101955) Bennu. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Source
BibTeX
@article{ballouz2021modified, title = {Modified granular impact force laws for the OSIRIS-REx touchdown on the surface of asteroid (101955) Bennu}, author = {Ballouz, R.-L. and Walsh, K.J. and Sánchez, P. and Holsapple, K.A. and Michel, P. and Scheeres, D.J. and Zhang, Y. and Richardson, D.C. and Barnouin, O.S. and Nolan, M.C. and Bierhaus, E.B. and Connolly, Jr., H.C. and Schwartz, S.R. and Çelik, O. and Baba, M. and Lauretta, D.S.}, journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society}, volume = {507}, pages = {5087--5105}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1093/mnras/stab2365} } - Scheeres, D. J., Hartzell, C. M., Sánchez, P. and Swift, M. (2010). Scaling forces to asteroid surfaces: The role of cohesion. Icarus. Source
BibTeX
@article{scheeres2010scaling, title = {Scaling forces to asteroid surfaces: The role of cohesion}, author = {Scheeres, D. J. and Hartzell, C. M. and S\'anchez, P. and Swift, M.}, journal = {Icarus}, volume = {210}, pages = {968--984}, year = {2010}, doi = {10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.009} } - Righter, K., Lunning, N. G., Nakamura-Messenger, K., Snead, C. J., McQuillan, J., Calaway, M., Allums, K., Rodriguez, M., Funk, R. C., Harrington, R. S., Connelly, W., Cowden, T., Dworkin, J. P., Lorentson, C. C., Sandford, S. A., Bierhaus, E. B., Freund, S., Connolly, H. C. J. and Lauretta, D. S. (2023). Curation planning and facilities for asteroid Bennu samples returned by the OSIRIS-REx mission. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 4. Source
BibTeX
@article{righter2023curation, title = {Curation planning and facilities for asteroid Bennu samples returned by the OSIRIS-REx mission}, author = {Righter, K. and Lunning, N. G. and Nakamura-Messenger, K. and Snead, C. J. and McQuillan, J. and Calaway, M. and Allums, K. and Rodriguez, M. and Funk, R. C. and Harrington, R. S. and Connelly, W. and Cowden, T. and Dworkin, J. P. and Lorentson, C. C. and Sandford, S. A. and Bierhaus, E. B. and Freund, S. and Connolly, H. C., Jr. and Lauretta, D. S.}, year = {2023}, journal = {Meteoritics \& Planetary Science}, volume = {58}, number = {4}, pages = {572--592}, doi = {10.1111/maps.13973}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230005897} } - Ajluni, T. M., Everett, D. F., Linn, T., Mink, R., Willcockson, W. and Wood, J. (2015). OSIRIS-REx, Returning the Asteroid Sample. NASA, 20150000809. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{ajluni2015osiris, title = {OSIRIS-REx, Returning the Asteroid Sample}, author = {Ajluni, Thomas M. and Everett, David F. and Linn, Timothy and Mink, Ronald and Willcockson, William and Wood, Joshua}, year = {2015}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20150000809}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150000809}, booktitle = {2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference}, doi = {10.1109/aero.2015.7118988}, pages = {1-15} } - Bierhaus, E. B., Clark, B. C., Harris, J. W., Payne, K. S., Dubisher, R. D., Wurts, D. W., Hund, R. A., Kuhns, R. M., Linn, T. M., Wood, J. L., May, A. J., Dworkin, J. P., Beshore, E., Lauretta, D. S. and the OSIRIS-REx Team. (2018). The OSIRIS-REx Spacecraft and the Touch-and-Go Sample Acquisition Mechanism (TAGSAM). Space Science Reviews, 7. Source
BibTeX
@article{bierhaus2018osiris, author = {Bierhaus, E. B. and Clark, B. C. and Harris, J. W. and Payne, K. S. and Dubisher, R. D. and Wurts, D. W. and Hund, R. A. and Kuhns, R. M. and Linn, T. M. and Wood, J. L. and May, A. J. and Dworkin, J. P. and Beshore, E. and Lauretta, D. S. and {the OSIRIS-REx Team}}, title = {The {OSIRIS-REx} Spacecraft and the Touch-and-Go Sample Acquisition Mechanism ({TAGSAM})}, journal = {Space Science Reviews}, volume = {214}, number = {7}, pages = {107}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.1007/s11214-018-0521-6} } - (2026). NASA: OSIRIS-REx. science.nasa.gov/mission/osiris-rex (accessed 2026-09-02)
archived copy
BibTeX
@misc{nasaosiris, title = {NASA: OSIRIS-REx}, howpublished = {\url{https://science.nasa.gov/mission/osiris-rex/}}, organization = {science.nasa.gov}, year = {2026}, urldate = {2026-09-02} }
Further reading
- O'Neill, P. M., Golge, S. and Slaba, T. C. (2014). Implementing the Badhwar-O'Neill Galactic Cosmic Ray Model for Spacecraft Analysis. NASA. Source