Rashid
Program pages MBRSC: Rashid Rover
MBRSC.
Overview
Section titled “Overview”Rashid is a 10 kg four-wheeled micro-rover built by the Mohammed Bin Rashid Space Centre as the first vehicle of the Emirates Lunar Mission, a program intended to fly a series of rovers named Rashid to different lunar sites with different science objectives [1], [8]. Its prime objective was to traverse a mid-latitude landing site and return high-resolution imagery of the surface, with the vehicle itself framed as a technology demonstrator carrying a substantial instrument suite.
It was carried on the ispace Hakuto-R Mission 1 lander, which failed to land on 25 April 2023 UTC, and no payload could be operated after the landing attempt [5].
Specifications
Section titled “Specifications”| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Mass | about 10 kg | [1] |
| Wheels | 4 | |
| Slope capability | 20 degrees | |
| Rock height capability | 10 cm maximum | |
| Navigation cameras | 2 wide-field | |
| Power | solar panels mounted at a fixed angle chosen to maximize collection | |
| Communications channels | 2 | |
| Wheel tread | grousers | [3] |
| Science instruments | 4 plus 2 cameras | [3], [8] |
MBRSC does not publish the rover’s dimensions, drive speed, battery capacity or operating temperature range on its current pages.
Mission profile
Section titled “Mission profile”| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | 11 December 2022, on Hakuto-R Mission 1 | [5] |
| Landing attempt | 25 April 2023 UTC, 26 April JST | |
| Design traverse | several hundred meters over one lunar day | [3] |
| Landing site class | mid-latitude | [1] |
| Outcome | lost with the lander; no post-landing payload operation | [5] |
The lander began its descent sequence at 00:40 Japan Standard Time on 26 April 2023 from about 100 km altitude and completed the entire planned deceleration, reaching the target speed of less than 1 m/s in a vertical attitude [5]. Operation matched expectations until about 01:43, the scheduled landing time, at which point the lander’s own altitude estimate read zero while it was in fact about 5 km above the surface. It continued descending slowly until the propulsion system ran out of propellant, after which the controlled descent stopped and the vehicle is believed to have free-fallen to the surface.
The root cause was in software. As the lander navigated to the planned landing site, the altitude measured by the onboard sensors rose sharply when it passed over a cliff about 3 km in elevation that was determined to be a crater rim, producing a larger discrepancy between measured and pre-set estimated altitude than the software expected [5]. A filter designed to reject altitude measurements differing greatly from the lander’s own estimate, included to keep the lander operating stably in the event of a sensor hardware fault, concluded that the sensor reading was abnormal and intercepted all subsequent measured altitude data. A contributing factor was a decision to change the landing site after the critical design review completed in February 2021, which affected the verification and validation plan; prior landing simulations did not adequately represent the lunar terrain along the navigation route [5]. ispace concluded that Mission 1 Success milestones 9 and 10, completion of the lunar landing and establishment of stable post-landing conditions, could not be achieved and that customer payloads could not be operated [5].
Mobility
Section titled “Mobility”Four wheels, designed to climb slopes of 20 degrees and rocks up to 10 cm high [1]. The wheels carry grousers, and the wheel-terrain interaction of the design was modeled and measured under MBRSC support using a single-wheel test rig in a lunar soil simulant [3].
Measured and simulated single-wheel performance for the Rashid wheel from that rig:
| Slip ratio | Drawbar pull, simulated | Drawbar pull, measured | Normal force, simulated | Normal force, measured | Sinkage, simulated | Sinkage, measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 5.34 N | 5.2 N | 59 N | 62 N | 0.011 m | 0.010 m |
| 0.25 | 9.26 N | 10.10 N | 58.7 N | 62.3 N | 0.016 m | 0.0158 m |
| 0.50 | 17.2 N | 16.77 N | 59.1 N | 62.1 N | 0.0175 m | 0.0169 m |
| 0.75 | 23.6 N | 24.1 N | 60.2 N | 62.1 N | 0.0208 m | 0.0192 m |
Drawbar pull is set predominantly by slip: as the resisting load in the direction of travel rises, required drawbar pull rises proportionally and wheel slip rises with it [3]. Normal force is close to constant across slip, and sinkage and slip are proportional. Of the terrain parameters, the internal friction angle is the most influential on slip, with softer terrain, meaning lower friction angle, producing more of it.
The modeling used the Reece pressure-sinkage relation rather than Bekker or Wong-Reece, because Bekker-derived formulations are inaccurate for wheels below 500 mm diameter on very loose terrain, and the Reece form was modified to represent the grousers as a sinusoidal component added to the pressure-sinkage response with amplitude and frequency set by grouser geometry and count [3]. The soil parameters fitted for the simulant were a frictional modulus of sinkage of 80, a shear deformation modulus of 0.036 m, a sinkage exponent of 1, a weight density of 13,734 N per cubic meter, an internal friction angle of 28 degrees and zero cohesion, giving a highly compressible soil with low internal friction and low motion resistance.
Power and energy
Section titled “Power and energy”Solar panels are mounted at a fixed angle chosen to maximize energy collection; after collection and battery charging, regulated voltages are distributed to the subsystems [1]. No generation figure or battery capacity is published.
Thermal
Section titled “Thermal”No rover thermal design values are published. A lunar night recovery phase was planned for, and one of the two communications channels was reserved for it [1].
Compute and avionics
Section titled “Compute and avionics”No processor part, memory or radiation tolerance approach for Rashid is published.
Autonomy
Section titled “Autonomy”Rashid was driven remotely by an operator, with two wide-field cameras used for navigation and to increase the operator’s awareness of the environment during driving [1]. No onboard autonomous navigation is published.
Communications
Section titled “Communications”Two channels are used. The primary channel carries the mission traffic, giving high bandwidth at low power draw on the rover, and depends on the lander [1]. The secondary channel draws more power and is slower but does not depend on the lander, which is why it serves both as the backup and as the link for the lunar night recovery phase.
Payload and instruments
Section titled “Payload and instruments”| Instrument | Function | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CAM-M microscopic imager | regolith particle size distribution and surface structure at microscopic scales | [8] |
| LNG Langmuir probe system | electron density profile of the surface sheath, its behavior through the lunar day and its dependence on topography | |
| CAM-T thermal imager | low spatial resolution thermal imaging | |
| MAD | in-situ testing of the adhesive and abrasive properties of various materials against lunar regolith | |
| Main and secondary cameras | surface imaging and navigation | [1] |
The science program covers both fundamental science and engineering questions aimed at enabling later missions to the lunar surface and to other airless bodies [8]. The intended investigations were lunar geology, surface alteration mechanisms, the interaction of the soil with the solar wind, and the suitability of materials for future lunar missions [1].
Modes of operation
Section titled “Modes of operation”The published operating phases are surface driving under remote command with imaging, science measurement, and a lunar night recovery phase served by the secondary communications channel [1]. The rover never reached the surface.
Ground operations
Section titled “Ground operations”Operations were to be run by MBRSC with the rover driven remotely [1]. No planning cycle or tooling detail is published.
Technologies developed
Section titled “Technologies developed”The vehicle’s stated purpose was to be a technology demonstrator guiding the next generation of lunar missions and solar system exploration for the UAE program [1]. The transferable engineering results published so far are the validated wheel-terrain interaction model for a sub-500 mm grousered wheel on very loose simulant, built on a grouser-modified Reece pressure-sinkage relation and matched against single-wheel test rig measurements across slip ratios from 0 to 0.75 [3], and the two-channel communications architecture in which the backup link is deliberately made independent of the lander so that it can also serve lunar night recovery.
The program continues. MBRSC is building Rashid 2 to the same series definition, with objectives covering the geological and thermal properties of the surface, mapping the electrical charging process and the formation of the electron sheath across the lunar day, and science and engineering experiments in materials, mobility and terramechanics [9].
References
- Abubakar, A., Alhammadi, R., Zweiri, Y. and Seneviratne, L. (2023). Advance Simulation Method for Wheel-Terrain Interactions of Space Rovers: A Case Study on the UAE Rashid Rover
. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12431. Source
BibTeX
@article{abubakar2023advance, title = {Advance Simulation Method for Wheel-Terrain Interactions of Space Rovers: A Case Study on the UAE Rashid Rover}, author = {Abubakar, Ahmad and Alhammadi, Ruqqayya and Zweiri, Yahya and Seneviratne, Lakmal}, journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12431}, pages = {526-532}, year = {2023}, doi = {10.1109/icar58858.2023.10406669}, abstract = {A thorough analysis of wheel-terrain interaction is crucial to ensure the safe and efficient operation of space rovers on extraterrestrial surfaces like the Moon or Mars. This paper presents an approach for developing and experimentally validating a novel virtual simulation method for the wheel-terrain interaction of the UAE Rashid rover's wheel. Specifically, the method is developed based on the modified Reece tire model in conjunction with the Grouser effect as an additional factor. The proposed method aims to improve the fidelity and capability of current simulation methods for space rovers. It considers various factors, such as wheel properties, wheel slippage, loose soil properties, and interaction mechanics. Moreover, the developed simulation method was validated through sets of experiments on a Test-rig that simulated lunar soil conditions. These experiments were carried out with different slip ratios of 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75, to test the behaviors acted on the rover's wheel by the lunar soil. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed simulation method provides an accurate and realistic simulation of the wheel-terrain interaction behavior, achieving an overall prediction accuracy of 95.57%.} } - Flahaut, J., Els, S., Joulaud, M., Wöhler, C., Breton, S., Füri, E., Almaeeni, S. and Almarzooqi, H. (2024). Candidate Landing Sites for the Emirates Lunar Mission (ELM) Rashid-1 Rover
. Space Science Reviews. Source
BibTeX
@article{flahaut2024candidate, title = {Candidate Landing Sites for the {Emirates Lunar Mission} ({ELM}) {Rashid-1} Rover}, author = {Flahaut, Jessica and Els, Sebastian and Joulaud, Marine and Wöhler, C. and Breton, Sylvain and Füri, Evelyn and Almaeeni, Sara and Almarzooqi, Hamad}, journal = {Space Science Reviews}, volume = {220}, pages = {58}, year = {2024}, doi = {10.1007/s11214-024-01086-x} } - Hirabayashi, M., Howl, B. A., Fassett, C. I., Soderblom, J. M., Minton, D. A. and Melosh, H. J. (2018). The role of breccia lenses in regolith generation from the formation of small, simple craters: Application to the Apollo 15 landing site
. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. Source
BibTeX
@article{hirabayashi2018breccia, title = {The role of breccia lenses in regolith generation from the formation of small, simple craters: Application to the Apollo 15 landing site}, author = {Hirabayashi, Masatoshi and Howl, B. A. and Fassett, Caleb I. and Soderblom, Jason M. and Minton, D. A. and Melosh, H. Jay}, journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets}, volume = {123}, pages = {527-543}, publisher = {American Geophysical Union (AGU)}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.1002/2017je005377}, abstract = {Abstract Impact cratering is likely a primary agent of regolith generation on airless bodies. Regolith production via impact cratering has long been a key topic of study since the Apollo era. The evolution of regolith due to impact cratering, however, is not well understood. A better formulation is needed to help quantify the formation mechanism and timescale of regolith evolution. Here we propose an analytically derived stochastic model that describes the evolution of regolith generated by small, simple craters. We account for ejecta blanketing as well as regolith infilling of the transient crater cavity. Our results show that the regolith infilling plays a key role in producing regolith. Our model demonstrates that because of the stochastic nature of impact cratering, the regolith thickness varies laterally, which is consistent with earlier work. We apply this analytical model to the regolith evolution at the Apollo 15 site. The regolith thickness is computed considering the observed crater size‐frequency distribution of small, simple lunar craters (< 381 m in radius for ejecta blanketing and <100 m in radius for the regolith infilling). Allowing for some amount of regolith coming from the outside of the area, our result is consistent with an empirical result from the Apollo 15 seismic experiment. Finally, we find that the timescale of regolith growth is longer than that of crater equilibrium, implying that even if crater equilibrium is observed on a cratered surface, it is likely that the regolith thickness is still evolving due to additional impact craters.} } - ispace, I. (2023). ispace Announces Results of the HAKUTO-R Mission 1 Lunar Landing. ispace-inc.com/news-en
BibTeX
@misc{ispace2023results, title = {ispace Announces Results of the HAKUTO-R Mission 1 Lunar Landing}, author = {{ispace, inc.}}, organization = {ispace-inc.com}, year = {2023}, url = {https://ispace-inc.com/news-en/?p=4691} } - Joulaud, M., Flahaut, J., Allemand, P., Füri, E., Wöhler, C., Breton, S. and Els, S. (2024). Investigation of the Regolith Thickness and Boulder Density at the Four Candidate Landing Sites of the Emirates Lunar Mission Rashid-1 Rover
. Space Science Reviews. Source
BibTeX
@article{joulaud2024investigation, title = {Investigation of the Regolith Thickness and Boulder Density at the Four Candidate Landing Sites of the {Emirates Lunar Mission} {Rashid-1} Rover}, author = {Joulaud, Marine and Flahaut, Jessica and Allemand, Pascal and Füri, Evelyn and Wöhler, C. and Breton, Sylvain and Els, Sebastian}, journal = {Space Science Reviews}, volume = {220}, pages = {80}, year = {2024}, doi = {10.1007/s11214-024-01101-1} }
Further reading
- Chien, S. A., Visentin, G. and Basich, C. (2024). Exploring Beyond Earth using Space Robotics: Update . Science Robotics. Source
- Gerdts, S., Breckenridge, J. and Johnson, K. (2022). Lunar Rover Optimization Platform for Wheel Traction Studies . NASA Glenn Research Center. Source
- Hirano, D., Inazawa, M., Sutoh, M., Sawada, H., Kawai, Y., Nagata, M., Sakoda, G., Yoneda, Y. and Watanabe, K. (2024). Transformable Nano Rover for Space Exploration . IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. Source
- Hurrell, J., Takehana, K., Tanaka, T., Uno, K., Busoud, A. K. and Yoshida, K. (2025). Traction Performance Evaluation for a Rashid-1 Rover Wheel . Space Science Reviews. Source
- Théret, N., Cucchetti, E., Robert, E., Virmontois, C., Millancourt, C., Douaglin, Q., Amsili, A. and Belloir, J.-M. (2024). Enhanced Image Processing for the CASPEX Cameras Onboard the Rashid-1 Rover . Space Science Reviews. Source
- (2025). Universe Today: HAKUTO-R Mission 2's Crash was Caused by its Laser Range Finder. universetoday.com/articles/hakuto-r-mission-2s-crash-was-caused-by-it...
- (2026). MBRSC: Rashid Rover. mbrsc.ae/rashid-rover