Astrobee
Program pages NASA: Astrobee
Christina Koch. Public domain (NASA / US government work).
Overview
Section titled “Overview”Astrobee is a fleet of three free-flying robots operating inside the pressurized volume of the International Space Station: Honey, Bumble and Queen [9]. They replaced SPHERES as the station’s intravehicular free-flyer facility. The design is modular and upgradeable, with propulsion by electric fan rather than stored propellant, built-in cameras, and a perching arm for grasping handrails.
Specifications
Section titled “Specifications”| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Envelope | 12.5 in cube (about 30 cm) | [2], [1] |
| Mass | about 10 kg | [3] |
| Design life | 5 years | [2] |
| Maximum velocity | 0.5 m/s | [3] |
| Localization accuracy | 1 cm | [3] |
| Payload bays | 4, two on top and two on the bottom; up to 3 usable at once by guest science | [4] |
| Payload bay port | 14.4 VDC nominal battery power and USB 2.0 | [4] |
| Perching arm degrees of freedom | 3, two joints plus gripper | [3], [4] |
Mission profile
Section titled “Mission profile”| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Docking station launched | 17 November 2018 | [9] |
| Docking station installed in the JEM | 15 February 2019 | [9] |
| Bumble and Honey launched | 17 April 2019 | [9] |
| Queen and three perching arms launched | 25 July 2019 | [9] |
| Dock commissioned | 11 February 2019 | [4] |
| Bumble commissioned | 30 April 2019, 135 sessions to 2025 | [4] |
| Honey commissioned | 30 October 2019, 59 sessions to 2025 | [4] |
| Perching arms commissioned | 4 February 2021, 23 sessions to 2025 | [4] |
| Queen commissioned | 20 September 2021, 21 sessions to 2025 | [4] |
| On-orbit real-time operations through 2025 | more than 165, of which more than 90 were guest science test sessions | [4] |
| Console support | more than 1200 hours, about 220 of them involving crew | [4] |
| Operating volume | Japanese Experiment Module, Node 2, US Laboratory | [3] |
Queen and Bumble operated independently in separate modules on 7 April 2022 [9]. In September 2025 NASA awarded Arkisys, Inc. a reimbursable Space Act Agreement to sustain and maintain the platform.
Propulsion
Section titled “Propulsion”Propulsion is electric and uses cabin air rather than stored propellant, which removes both resupply and any exhaust product that would contaminate the atmosphere. Two propulsion modules, right and left, each contain one centrifugal impeller feeding a single plenum that discharges through six variable-area nozzles, twelve in total, with the propulsion parameters below [2].
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Impellers | 2, one per module |
| Nozzles | 12, 6 per module |
| Maximum thrust per nozzle | 0.3 N |
| Maximum total thrust | 3.6 N |
| Nozzle exit velocity | 11 m/s |
| Nozzle discharge coefficient | 0.9 |
| Flapper travel | 64 deg |
| Flapper backlash | 1.8 deg |
| Nozzle servo | MKS DS95 |
Each nozzle exit area is set by a pair of gear-synchronized flappers driven by a hobby-grade radio-control servo [2]. Modulating twelve exit areas against two constant-speed impellers gives holonomic control: force in any direction plus torque about any axis, six degrees of freedom. Total thrust of 3.6 N against a 10 kg vehicle gives a maximum acceleration near 0.36 m/s2, which is four orders of magnitude above the milli-g disturbance levels the station structure sees from crew exercise and equipment [7].
Localization and navigation
Section titled “Localization and navigation”Localization is six-degree-of-freedom and vision-based, matching wall texture features against a prior sparse feature map, with no beacons or added infrastructure in the module [1], [4]. Visual odometry allows continued navigation through regions where mapped features are absent [3]. Position accuracy is about 1 cm, which is what visual servoing tasks require.
Six cameras are carried [4]: NavCam for mapping and localization, SciCam, a 13 MP forward-facing RGB imager used to stream video of crew activities [1], and HazCam, SpeedCam, PerchCam and DockCam for obstacle detection, velocity estimation, arm operations and docking respectively [1], [3].
Compute
Section titled “Compute”Flight computing is split across three processor boards by real-time requirement [1]:
| Board | Role |
|---|---|
| Low-Level Processor | hard real-time motion control |
| Mid-Level Processor | core flight software, navigation, obstacle detection |
| High-Level Processor | payload interface and guest science code |
Source: [1].
Guest science code runs on the high-level processor, isolated from the control loop, so a visiting researcher cannot destabilize the vehicle.
Perching arm
Section titled “Perching arm”A stowable arm mounted in a payload bay grips a handrail so the robot can shut down propulsion and hold station at low power [3]. While perched the arm joints double as a pan and tilt unit for the forward-facing cameras, the SciCam among them [3], [4]. The flight arm has three actuated degrees of freedom, two joints plus the gripper, and stows completely inside the top aft payload bay. The gripper is under-actuated and compliant, closed passively by torsional springs in the finger joints and opened by a single motor reeling two tendons, so it holds a handrail through a long perch without drawing power [4]. The gripper is one degree of freedom, two fingers of two revolute joints each driven by a single tendon, and the end-effector module is swappable on orbit so that a guest scientist can fit a different gripper or add arm degrees of freedom [6].
Docking
Section titled “Docking”The dock is 85 by 38 by 28 cm and provides two berths [3]. Retention is magnetic and alignment is visual, against fiducial markers on the dock. Self-docking to recharge is what permits multi-day operation with no crew involvement.
Communications
Section titled “Communications”While flying, Astrobees link to the station local area network over the ISS Wi-Fi network, and when docked they communicate over wired Ethernet through the dock, which raises bandwidth and serves as a backup link [4]. Payloads have used both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands [5]. A free-flyer is itself a usable instrument for characterizing that network: an Astrobee Wi-Fi survey of the US Laboratory found received signal strength between -65 and -45 dBm over the optimal region, a 20 dB dynamic range within it, 35 dB of attenuation through a module hatch, and more than 20 dB of loss when the payload antenna sat orthogonal to the access point antenna.
SPHERES, the predecessor
Section titled “SPHERES, the predecessor”| Parameter | SPHERES | Astrobee | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Propulsion | cold gas thrusters at about 25 psi, exhaust velocity about 250 m/s | electric impeller at about 0.1 psi, exhaust velocity about 11 m/s | [1] |
| Localization | ultrasonic beacons installed in the module | onboard vision against a prior feature map, no added infrastructure | [4] |
SPHERES cold gas operation consumed reaction mass that had to be resupplied, while an Astrobee draws on cabin air and recharges itself at the dock [1]. Astrobee’s requirement to dock and recharge without crew involvement, and to localize without beacons, follows directly from that difference [4].
Operations
Section titled “Operations”Astrobee runs experiment sessions, environmental surveys and guest payloads on the standardized bays [4]. Nearly 80 percent of console time across the first six years needed no crew at all. Each payload bay carries a blind-mate connector supplying 14.4 V nominal battery power and USB 2.0 data, engaged by two tool-free quarter-turn fasteners, and up to three payloads can be hosted at once [1]. Investigators develop against a simulator and then run on flight hardware.
References
- Smith, T., Barlow, J., Bualat, M., Fong, T., Provencher, C., Sanchez, H. and Smith, E. (2016). Astrobee: A New Platform for Free-Flying Robotics on the International Space Station. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{smith2015astrobee, title = {Astrobee: A New Platform for Free-Flying Robotics on the International Space Station}, author = {Smith, Trey and Barlow, Jonathan and Bualat, Maria and Fong, Terrence and Provencher, Christopher and Sanchez, Hugo and Smith, Ernest}, year = {2016}, booktitle = {13th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS)}, address = {Beijing, China}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160007769} } - Daley, E. (2020). Astrobee Free-Flyer Nozzle Mechanism Summary. NASA, 20200010325. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{daley2020astrobee, title = {Astrobee Free-Flyer Nozzle Mechanism Summary}, author = {Daley, Earl}, year = {2020}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20200010325}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200010325}, booktitle = {The 45th Aerospace Mechanism Symposium}, address = {Houston, TX} } - Bualat, M. G., Smith, T., Fong, T. W., Smith, E. E. and Wheeler, D. W. (2018). Astrobee: A New Tool for ISS Operations. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{bualat2018astrobee, title = {Astrobee: A New Tool for ISS Operations}, author = {Bualat, Maria G. and Smith, Trey and Fong, Terrence W. and Smith, Ernest E. and Wheeler, D. W.}, year = {2018}, booktitle = {2018 SpaceOps Conference}, address = {Marseille, France}, doi = {10.2514/6.2018-2517}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180003326} } - Alexandrov, O., Barlow, J., Benavides, J., Bualat, M., Carlino, R., Coltin, B., Cortez, J., Daley, E., Feller, J., Flückiger, L., Fong, T., Fusco, J., Garcia Ruiz, R., Hamilton, K., Kanis, S., Katterhagen, A., Kim, Y., Love, J. F., McIntyre, M., McLachlan, B., Mora Vargas, A., Moratto, Z., Moreira, M., Morse, T., Orosco, H., Park, I.-W., Provencher, C., Sanchez, H., Sharif, K., Smith, E., Smith, T., Soussan, R., Symington, A., Talavera, R. O., To, V., Wheeler, D. and Yoo, J. (2026). Astrobee: Free-Flying Robots for the International Space Station. IEEE Transactions on Field Robotics. Source
BibTeX
@article{alexandrov2026astrobee, title = {Astrobee: Free-Flying Robots for the International Space Station}, author = {Alexandrov, Oleg and Barlow, Jonathan and Benavides, Jose and Bualat, Maria and Carlino, Roberto and Coltin, Brian and Cortez, Jose and Daley, Earl and Feller, Jeffrey and Fl{\"u}ckiger, Lorenzo and Fong, Terrence and Fusco, Jesse and Garcia Ruiz, Ruben and Hamilton, Kathryn and Kanis, Simeon and Katterhagen, Aric and Kim, Yunkyung and Love, John F. and McIntyre, Michael and McLachlan, Blair and Mora Vargas, Andres and Moratto, Zack and Moreira, Marina and Morse, Theodore and Orosco, Henry and Park, In-Won and Provencher, Christopher and Sanchez, Hugo and Sharif, Khaled and Smith, Ernest and Smith, Trey and Soussan, Ryan and Symington, Andrew and Talavera, Rafael Omar and To, Vinh and Wheeler, DW and Yoo, Jongwoon}, year = {2026}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Field Robotics}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20260001396} } - Yang, E., Hwu, S. U., Lansdowne, C., Boster, J. P. and deSilva, K. (2024). Wi-Fi Signal Survey of the International Space Station by Autonomous Free-Flying Robot. NASA, 20240014199. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{yang2024wi, title = {Wi-Fi Signal Survey of the International Space Station by Autonomous Free-Flying Robot}, author = {Yang, Everest and Hwu, Shian U. and Lansdowne, Chatwin and Boster, John P. and deSilva, Kanishka}, year = {2024}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20240014199}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240014199}, booktitle = {2024 IEEE International Conference on Wireless for Space and Extreme Environments (WiSEE)}, doi = {10.1109/wisee61249.2024.10850420}, pages = {238-243} } - Park, I.-W., Smith, T., Sanchez, H., Wong, S. W., Piacenza, P. and Ciocarlie, M. (2017). Developing a 3-DOF Compliant Perching Arm for a Free-Flying Robot on the International Space Station. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{kam2025abdom, title = {Developing a 3-DOF Compliant Perching Arm for a Free-Flying Robot on the International Space Station}, author = {Park, In-Won and Smith, Trey and Sanchez, Hugo and Wong, Sze Wun and Piacenza, Pedro and Ciocarlie, Matei}, year = {2017}, booktitle = {2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)}, pages = {1135-1141}, doi = {10.1109/aim.2017.8014171}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170009546} } - McPherson, K., Kelly, E. and Keller, J. (2009). Acceleration Environment of the International Space Station. NASA, 20120012936. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{mcpherson2009acceleration, title = {Acceleration Environment of the International Space Station}, author = {McPherson, Kevin and Kelly, Eric and Keller, Jennifer}, year = {2009}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20120012936}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20120012936}, booktitle = {47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition}, doi = {10.2514/6.2009-957} } - Dorais, G. A. and Gawdiak, Y. (2003). The Personal Satellite Assistant: An Internal Spacecraft Autonomous Mobile Monitor. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{dorais2003personal, author = {Dorais, G. A. and Gawdiak, Y.}, title = {The Personal Satellite Assistant: An Internal Spacecraft Autonomous Mobile Monitor}, booktitle = {2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings}, year = {2003}, doi = {10.1109/aero.2003.1235064} }
Further reading
- Bualat, M., Barlow, J., Fong, T., Provencher, C., Smith, T. and Zuniga, A. (2015). Astrobee: Developing a Free Flying Robot for the International Space Station. NASA. Source
- (2026). NASA: Astrobee. nasa.gov/astrobee
- NASA. (2020). Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE), Revision G. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. Source
- Lear, D. M., Hoffman, K. D., Hyde, J. L. and Collins, C. M. (2019). Bumper: A Tool for Analyzing Spacecraft Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris Risk. NASA. Source
- O'Neill, P. M., Golge, S. and Slaba, T. C. (2014). Implementing the Badhwar-O'Neill Galactic Cosmic Ray Model for Spacecraft Analysis. NASA. Source