Skip to content

Dextre

Dextre holding a Cargo Transport Container on the International Space Station, 17 April 2011. Both seven-jointed arms are extended from the body, which carries the single roll joint at the waist and is anchored at top to a grapple fixture on the station; the Orbital Replacement Unit Tool Changeout Mechanism at each arm tip is the cylindrical unit from which the container is suspended at right. The container is a payload of the class Dextre exchanges in place of a spacewalk NASA. Public domain (NASA / US government work).

Dextre, formally the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator, is a two-armed manipulator that mounts on Canadarm2 or on a station grapple fixture and performs maintenance that would otherwise require a spacewalk. It was required to insert and extract orbital replacement units, actuate hinge-like mechanisms on the truss, and manipulate and inspect payloads, reducing the need for costly and hazardous extravehicular activity [1].

ParameterValueSource
Arms2, 7 joints each[1], [2]
Arm reach3.3 m straight-arm[1]
Payload capacity per arm600 kg[2], [1]
Body roll joint1 DOF at the waist[2]
Motion resolution requirement2 mm[2]
Joints total, including the flight spare arm21[3]
ParameterValueSource
HostInternational Space Station, on Canadarm2 or a station grapple fixture[2]
Launch configuration9 separate components
On-orbit assemblyabout 6 h of EVA
Station orbital replacement units designated for robotic servicingabout 250[2]
Of those, compatible with Dextre interfacesabout 200

Rows with no marker are from [3].

Each arm has three joints at the shoulder, one pitch at the elbow and three at the wrist [2]. The upper body attaches through a Power Data Grapple Fixture interface and the lower body carries a Latching End Effector, so Dextre can be held by Canadarm2 or can hold itself onto the station. Design commonality with the SSRMS joints and end effector is deliberate [3].

Each arm terminates in an ORU/Tool Changeout Mechanism carrying a parallel-jaw gripper compatible with H fixtures and micro fixtures, a retractable 7/16 inch socket drive, an extendable umbilical passing power, data and video to the grasped unit, a two-stop zoom camera and two lights [2]. A body-mounted tool holder carries four tools that the arms exchange without crew involvement, and two outriggers carry camera and light pan-tilt assemblies.

Payload interfaces are typed. The standard interface is a micro fixture, whose normal operating loads of 100 N and 85 N m bound the peak transient contact forces and moments allowed during a grasp; units with a micro-conical interface, such as the 6B avionics boxes, are handled instead through a separate Robot Micro-Conical Tool, whose offset makes the force-moment accommodation problem harder [1]. Heavier payloads are grasped directly at a grasp fixture. A dedicated H fixture on the station stabilizes the body during two-arm work [2].

Only one arm moves at a time, a power limit rather than a control limit [1]. The other holds a fixed grasp to provide a stable reference, since two arms sharing a compliant base would couple their position errors, and the 2 mm motion resolution requirement [2] does not survive that coupling.

Each arm carries a six-axis force-moment sensor on the OTCM [1]. Force-Moment Accommodation closes an outer loop on that sensor so the arm complies with contact rather than driving through it. Commanded steady-state limits are 4 N of lateral force and 3.1 N m of lateral moment, excluding transients, within a user-selectable range of 0 to 111 N and 0 to 54 N m [1].

ParameterValue
Teleoperated positioning accuracy6 mm, 2.0 deg
Automatic incremental adjustment2 mm, 0.1 deg
ORU capture envelope5 cm lateral, 8 deg about any axis
Micro fixture operating limits100 N, 85 N m
Guide design load50 N, 50 N m
Transient force limit during bolt following12 N peak
Insertion force and moment resolution4 N, 2.37 N m
Gripper jaw closure15 to 20 s
Operator guideline on peak transients5 s maximum duration

Source: [1].

The case for the control law is measurable. Three operators inserted a DDCU orbital replacement unit on the SPDM ground testbed with and without Force-Moment Accommodation [1]:

OperatorWithout FMAWith FMA
11.5 mm/s, 5 min, peak 200 N and 12 N m5.5 mm/s, 2.0 min, peak 18 N and 25 N m
20.5 mm/s, 17.5 min, peak 190 N and 45 N m5.5 mm/s, 2.0 min, peak 19 N and 24 N m
31.5 mm/s, over 15 min, peak 220 N and 37 N m4.2 mm/s, 2.5 min, peak 16 N and 20 N m

Source: [1].

Peak contact force falls by roughly an order of magnitude and insertion time by a factor of three to eight. Since orbital replacement units cannot be repaired on orbit, the peak force column is the binding number, not the time column, and the requirements verification program was built around demonstrating those interface loads rather than around task speed [3]. Ground testing is run inside a gravity envelope of plus or minus 3 degrees of attitude, within which gravity compensation holds residual force below 3 N and residual moment below 1 N m [1]; the testbed travels 5 ft vertically, 3 ft along the insertion axis and 1 ft laterally.

Dextre and its payloads are maintained by heaters sized against eclipse. The Robotic Refueling Mission payload it hosts illustrates the allocations: two Shuttle heater feeds totalling 230 W at maximum voltage, about 216 W at nominal, each circuit controlled by two Elmwood mechanical thermostats in series switching between +25 and +30 C [4]. On ELC-4 the station provides two feeds totalling 290 W at maximum voltage, about 245 W nominal. Tool heaters are separately powered through the OTCM: 5 W per tool camera with two cameras per tool, and 10 W per tool electronics box, with thermostat set points of -25/-16 C for the cameras and -32/-26 C for the electronics [4].

Dextre hosted the Robotic Refueling Mission series, which operated on representative satellite fuel valves including wire-locked caps, cutting safety wire, removing caps and transferring fluid [5]. RRM3 extended this to cryogenics.

RRM3 parameterValueSource
Methane loadabout 50 liters[6], [7]
Zero boil-off duration, ground plus orbit6 months
Demonstrated on-orbit storage4 months
Receiver dewar temperaturebelow 82 K
Methane triple point90.7 K
No-vent transfers demonstrated on the ground5
Autogenous pressurization cycle20 min
Ground supply dewar450 liter DOT-rated Chart Microfueler[7]
Methane purity requested / delivered99.9 / 98.2 percent[7]
Launch5 December 2018[7]

Rows with no marker are from [6].

Ground servicing with liquid methane imposed a 150 ft dynamic hazard control zone during testing, a 50 ft continuous control zone, a vent stack 35 ft from the work building and an 18 ft standoff for the command trailer [7]. Machine vision calibration for RRM3 held below 2 mm of error [5], and telerobotic operation required a minimum of 10 frames per second of video, with 24 preferred. Operations ran 16 to 20 hours per day with a three-person flight controller team and about twelve supporting staff at Goddard.

Round-trip communication delay to the station is 5 to 6 seconds or more [8], so continuous force-reflecting teleoperation is not available and the Force-Moment Accommodation loop has to close on orbit rather than on the ground. Procedures are developed against a six-degree-of-freedom industrial robot at Goddard and an MDA ground trainer carrying SPDM-representative hardware [5].

Robotic cargo operations are long by EVA standards but cost no crew time.

References

  1. Mukherji, R., Rey, D. A., Stieber, M. and Lymer, J. (2001). Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) Advanced Control Features and Development Test Results. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{mukherji2001special,
      title = {Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) Advanced Control Features and Development Test Results},
      author = {Mukherji, R. and Rey, D. A. and Stieber, M. and Lymer, J.},
      year = {2001},
      booktitle = {Proc. 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS)},
      address = {St-Hubert, Quebec},
      url = {https://roboshare.esa.int/i-SAIRAS/isairas2001/papers/Paper_AM104.pdf}
    }
  2. Stieber, M. E., Hunter, D. G. and Abramovici, A. (1999). Overview of the Mobile Servicing System for the International Space Station. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{stieber1999overview,
      title = {Overview of the Mobile Servicing System for the International Space Station},
      author = {Stieber, M. E. and Hunter, D. G. and Abramovici, A.},
      year = {1999},
      booktitle = {Proc. 5th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS)},
      address = {ESTEC, Noordwijk},
      url = {http://robotics.estec.esa.int/i-SAIRAS/isairas1999/s02-01.pdf}
    }
  3. Bassett, D. A. and Abramovici, A. (1999). Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) Requirements Verification. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{bassett1999special,
      title = {Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) Requirements Verification},
      author = {Bassett, D. A. and Abramovici, A.},
      year = {1999},
      booktitle = {Proc. 5th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS)},
      address = {ESTEC, Noordwijk},
      url = {http://robotics.estec.esa.int/i-SAIRAS/isairas1999/s02-02.pdf}
    }
  4. Gregory, T. H. and Newman, M. (2011). Thermal Design Considerations of the Robotic Refueling Mission (RRM). NASA, 20110013452. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{gregory2011thermal,
      title = {Thermal Design Considerations of the Robotic Refueling Mission (RRM)},
      author = {Gregory, Teri H. and Newman, Miles},
      year = {2011},
      institution = {NASA},
      number = {20110013452},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20110013452},
      booktitle = {41st International Conference on Environmental Systems},
      doi = {10.2514/6.2011-5072}
    }
  5. Tomlinson, Z., Gallagher, W., Cassidy, J., Roberts, B., Facciol, K. and Easley, J. (2021). Lessons for Future In-Space Telerobotic Servicing from Robotic Refueling Mission. NASA, 20210022255. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{tomlinson2021lessons,
      title = {Lessons for Future In-Space Telerobotic Servicing from Robotic Refueling Mission},
      author = {Tomlinson, Zakiya and Gallagher, William and Cassidy, Justin and Roberts, Brian and Facciol, Kristen and Easley, Joseph},
      year = {2021},
      institution = {NASA},
      number = {20210022255},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210022255},
      booktitle = {2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)},
      doi = {10.1109/aero53065.2022.9843499},
      pages = {1-17}
    }
  6. Breon, S. R., Boyle, R. F., Francom, M. B., DeLee, C. H., Francis, J. J., Mustafi, S., Barfknecht, P. W., McGuire, J. M., Krenn, A. G., Zimmerli, G. A. and Hauser, D. M. (2020). Robotic Refueling Mission-3---an overview. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{breon2019robotic,
      title = {Robotic Refueling Mission-3---an overview},
      author = {Breon, S. R. and Boyle, R. F. and Francom, M. B. and DeLee, C. H. and Francis, J. J. and Mustafi, S. and Barfknecht, P. W. and McGuire, J. M. and Krenn, A. G. and Zimmerli, G. A. and Hauser, D. M.},
      year = {2020},
      journal = {IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering},
      volume = {755},
      pages = {012002},
      doi = {10.1088/1757-899X/755/1/012002},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/755/1/012002}
    }
  7. Krenn, A., Stewart, M., Mitchell, D., Dixon, K., Mierzwa, M. and Breon, S. (2019). Flight Servicing of Robotic Refueling Mission 3. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{krenn2019flight,
      title = {Flight Servicing of Robotic Refueling Mission 3},
      author = {Krenn, A. and Stewart, M. and Mitchell, D. and Dixon, K. and Mierzwa, M. and Breon, S.},
      year = {2019},
      journal = {IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190027566}
    }
  8. Landzettel, K., Brunner, B., Schreiber, G., Steinmetz, B.-M. and Dupuis, E. (2001). MSS Ground Control Demo with MARCO. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{landzettel2001mss,
      title = {MSS Ground Control Demo with MARCO},
      author = {Landzettel, K. and Brunner, B. and Schreiber, G. and Steinmetz, B.-M. and Dupuis, E.},
      year = {2001},
      booktitle = {Proc. 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS)},
      address = {St-Hubert, Quebec},
      url = {https://roboshare.esa.int/i-SAIRAS/isairas2001/papers/Paper_EU047.pdf}
    }

Further reading

  • (2026). CSA: Dextre. asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/iss/dextre
  • NASA. (2020). Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE), Revision G. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. Source
  • Lear, D. M., Hoffman, K. D., Hyde, J. L. and Collins, C. M. (2019). Bumper: A Tool for Analyzing Spacecraft Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris Risk. NASA. Source
  • O'Neill, P. M., Golge, S. and Slaba, T. C. (2014). Implementing the Badhwar-O'Neill Galactic Cosmic Ray Model for Spacecraft Analysis. NASA. Source