Skip to content

Venus Surface Environment

The Venus surface is about 460 C at about 90 bar of supercritical carbon dioxide with a sulfuric acid aerosol above it [1], which admits two design responses: a sealed, thermally isolated volume with a fixed lifetime, or electronics that operate at ambient temperature.

QuantityValueSource
Surface temperatureabout 460 C[10]
Test reference condition465 C at 90 bar[10]
Surface pressureabout 90 bar[10]
Atmospheric density65 kg/m3[6]
Surface wind speed0.3 to 1.3 m/s, average 0.6 m/s[6]
Diurnal cycle116 days; night exceeds 50 Earth days[6]

Atmospheric density of 65 kg/m3 is about 50 times Earth sea level air, so a 0.6 m/s wind carries useful force despite the low speed [6]. A Savonius rotor produces 3.18 W at the average wind speed. Solar cells have been tested at Venus temperature but work for only half the diurnal cycle, and the night side of that cycle exceeds 50 Earth days [6].

The chemistry is the part that is usually understated. The gas load used to reproduce Venus surface conditions on the ground is carbon dioxide with nitrogen and a set of trace species that attack materials:

SpeciesFraction in the ground simulation mixture
CO296.5 percent
N23.4 percent
SO2130 ppm
COS27 ppm
CO15 ppm
H2O30 ppm
HCl0.5 ppm
NO5.5 ppb
HF5 ppb

All values from [8]. At 460 C, common engineering materials including aluminum are unusable [6].

The recorded lifetime of the sealed-vessel approach

Section titled “The recorded lifetime of the sealed-vessel approach”

Nine of the fourteen Soviet Venera and Vega landers reached the Venus surface, and those nine survived between 23 and 127 minutes before their electronics failed [6]. For a pre-chilled, insulated pressure vessel, lifetime is set by insulation mass and initial internal temperature. There is no repairable failure in that record; the vessel reaches ambient temperature and the electronics stop.

Venus-GRAM is the engineering model. Its lower atmosphere, to 250 km, is the Venus International Reference Atmosphere; its thermosphere from 250 to 1000 km is an MSFC model assuming an isothermal profile initialized from VIRA conditions at 250 km [1].

Known limits of that model matter as much as its contents. The VIRA version included holds Pioneer Venus Orbiter and Probe data plus Venera probe data, but carries no solid planet model and no high resolution gravity model [1]. Venus density varies little over the solar cycle, so that effect is not represented in the VIRA data or in Venus-GRAM at all [1]. Mean zonal wind is taken from VIRA only up to 80 km; above that height the decrease in mean wind and the perturbation magnitudes are parameterized from published models rather than measured.

The 2021 rebuild replaced the custom ephemeris engine with the NAIF SPICE library, converted the code to a C++ framework, and dropped the constant ratio of specific heats that had overestimated the speed of sound by as much as 10 percent [1].

The Glenn Extreme Environment Rig is the facility the endurance numbers below come from.

ParameterValueSource
Vessel304 stainless steel, 3 ft internal diameter by 4 ft long, about 800 L[8], [9]
Maximum rated conditions103 bar at about 530 C[9]
Gas streams9, each handling pure or mixed gases[8], [9]
Fill and heat-up4 working days[9]
Cool-down10 working days[9]
Chemistry verificationIn-line gas chromatograph, with an on-site mass spectrometer available[9]

Reproducing temperature and pressure alone is not sufficient to qualify parts for a prolonged surface mission; the atmospheric chemistry has to be reproduced too [2]. That finding is what makes a facility with nine independently controlled gas streams necessary rather than an oven and a pressure vessel.

The alternative to a sealed vessel is a wide bandgap semiconductor operating at ambient Venus temperature. The flight-relevant technology is the 4H-SiC junction field effect transistor integrated circuit [2].

GenerationTransistorsFunctionGate lengthDieI/O padsSource
1019516-bit RAM6 um3 x 3 mm32[4], [3]
10175divide-by-2/4 clock6 um3 x 3 mm32[4], [3]
11about 1000120-bit RAM6 um4.65 x 4.65 mm-[3]
12about 3000in fabrication3 um5 x 5 mm-[3]

Generation 11 shrank the resistor width from 6 um to 3 um and demonstrated an 8-bit delta-sigma analog-to-digital converter and a 998-bit read-only memory at 500 C, but it yielded and endured worse than Generation 10: no Generation 11 RAM chip had all 120 bits working even at 25 C, and the chips reached about 1000 hours above 460 C rather than the year Generation 10 achieved [3].

DeviceContinuous operation at 500 C in airSource
RAM #210,100 h, 421 days[4]
Clock #210,500 h[4]
Clock #3A and #3B9677 h each[4]
RAM #11525 h[4]

SiC JFET RAM output levels against 500 C test time to 421 days

Source: [4]. Public domain (NASA).

Parameters stabilize 100 to 200 h after first power-on and then drift by under 5 percent for the remainder of the test [4]. Supplies are +25 V and -25 V, with logic high near 0 V and logic low near -10 V. Power at 500 C is 194 mW for the 16-bit RAM, split 116 mW from the positive rail and 78 mW from the negative, and 298 mW for the clock chip, split 185 mW and 113 mW.

The demonstrated temperature range runs from -190 C to a short-duration record of 961 C [4]. Endurance above 500 C is much shorter: at 700 C an MF NOR logic gate ran 142 h and ring oscillator integrated circuits ran under 15 h [5].

The failure mechanism is not the semiconductor. At 500 C it is thermal-stress cracking of the SiO2 / Si3N4 / SiO2 passivation stack, which admits oxygen and oxidizes the TaSi2 metallization at the cracks; at 700 C the cracking is more extensive and propagates through the Metal 1 interconnect [5]. The passivation stack is 1 um TEOS LPCVD SiO2, 67 nm Si3N4 and 1 um TEOS LPCVD SiO2 [4]. Bond pads use a TaSi2/Pt/Ir/Pt stack capped with 1 um of electron-beam gold, with the same stack on the die backside. Packaging is high temperature co-fired ceramic composite with 32 I/O pins [5]. Process anneals are 1360 C in nitrogen for 100 h for dopant activation and 10 h in 96 percent N2 / 4 percent H2 at 500 C after processing [4].

Radiation tolerance is incidental but useful: room temperature testing took individual JFETs to over 7 Mrad(Si) total ionizing dose, and found single event upsets and transients only above a silicon linear energy transfer of about 9.6 MeV-cm2/mg [11]. For an interplanetary cruise the design environment remains the Badhwar-O’Neill galactic cosmic ray model [7].

Demonstrated operation in Venus conditions

Section titled “Demonstrated operation in Venus conditions”
ItemDuration in GEERSource
Packaged SiC divide-by-2/4 clock IC, 465 C at 90 bar60 days[10]
SO2 chemical microsensor platform60 days[2]
Upscaled SiC integrated circuits60 days[2]

A sensor platform built on this technology is targeted at 60 Earth days or longer on the surface [2]. Power is a sodium sulfur battery, a chemistry with terrestrial history that was space qualified on STS-87 in November 1997 and has been operated at 460 C and 92 bar, assumed at 120 Wh/kg for design study purposes. Communications are planned around 10 MHz, demonstrated in 2019, rising to about 100 MHz [2]. None of this requires cooling or environmental sheltering.

References

  1. Justh, H. L., Dwyer Cianciolo, A. M. and Hoffman, J. (2021). Venus Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Venus-GRAM): User Guide . NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA/TM-20210022168. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{justh2021venus,
      title = {Venus Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Venus-GRAM): User Guide},
      author = {Justh, Hilary L. and Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia M. and Hoffman, J.},
      number = {NASA/TM-20210022168},
      institution = {NASA Marshall Space Flight Center},
      year = {2021},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210022168},
      abstract = {This Technical Memorandum (TM) presents the Venus Global Reference Atmospheric Model (Venus-GRAM) and the updated features of the GRAMs. Venus-GRAM is an engineering-oriented atmospheric model that estimates mean values and statistical variations of atmospheric properties for Venus. This TM summarizes the atmospheric data model in Venus-GRAM and provides a guide for the user to obtain, set up, and run the code in various configurations. Additional details regarding the Venus-GRAM input and output files and how to interpret Venus-GRAM results are also provided.}
    }
  2. Hunter, G. W., Izenberg, N., Oleson, S. R., Newman, J. M., Gilmore, M., Jessup, K. L., Herrick, R., Balcerski, J., Colozza, A., Faller, B., Fincannon, J., Fittje, J., Gyekenyesi, J., Jones, R., Klefman, B., Landis, G., Martini, M., McCarty, S., Packard, T., Smith, D. and Turnbull, E. (2020). Compass Final Report: Venus Bridge Orbiter and Surface Study (V-BOSS) . NASA Glenn Research Center, NASA/TP-2020-220152. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{hunter2020compass,
      title = {Compass Final Report: Venus Bridge Orbiter and Surface Study (V-BOSS)},
      author = {Hunter, Gary W. and Izenberg, Noam and Oleson, Steven R. and Newman, J. M. and Gilmore, Martha and Jessup, Kandis Lea and Herrick, Robert and Balcerski, Jeffrey and Colozza, Anthony and Faller, Brent and Fincannon, James and Fittje, James and Gyekenyesi, John and Jones, Robert and Klefman, Brandon and Landis, Geoffrey and Martini, Michael and McCarty, Steven and Packard, Thomas and Smith, David and Turnbull, Elizabeth},
      number = {NASA/TP-2020-220152},
      institution = {NASA Glenn Research Center},
      year = {2020},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200013062},
      abstract = {The Venus Bridge Orbiter and Surface Study (V-BOSS) Compass concurrent engineering design team study shows that new, high-priority Venus science can be achieved using a linked Orbiter + Surface Element (Lander) mission concept within a $200M cost cap with assumptions. This is feasible through optimizing investment in early technologies and platforms, such as the Long-Lived In-Situ Solar System Explorer (LLISSE), leveraging known and flight-ready technology, and the overall use of simple, small, robust systems in innovative approaches to Venus exploration. This architecture allows a range of science investigations through modification of Orbiter-Lander platforms in this study through choice of other instruments (often sensors), science themes, or operational modes. In particular, a fundamental strength of this approach is to provide science not available in other ways by using simplified architectures including rugged systems operable in-situ on the Venus surface. Such investigations would be pathfinders for more complex, and more expensive, future missions. Additionally, the results of this study can be used to further champion the need, value and return of early investment technology programs for the hard problem of in-situ investigations at Venus.}
    }
  3. Neudeck, P. G., Spry, D. J., Krasowski, M. J., Chen, L., Greer, L. C., Chang, C. W., Lukco, D., Beheim, G. M. and Prokop, N. F. (2021). Upscaling of 500 C Durable SiC JFET-R Integrated Circuits . International Conference and Exhibition on High Temperature Electronics. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{neudeck2021upscaling,
      title = {Upscaling of 500 C Durable SiC JFET-R Integrated Circuits},
      author = {Neudeck, Philip G. and Spry, David J. and Krasowski, Michael J. and Chen, Liangyu and Greer, Lawrence C. and Chang, Carl W. and Lukco, Dorothy and Beheim, Glenn M. and Prokop, Norman F.},
      booktitle = {International Conference and Exhibition on High Temperature Electronics},
      volume = {2021},
      pages = {000064-000068},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.4071/2380-4491.2021.hitec.000064},
      abstract = {Abstract At HiTEC 2018, NASA Glenn Research Center reported the first demonstration of yearlong 500 °C operation of ceramic-packaged “Generation 10” ~200-transistor integrated circuits (ICs) based on two-level interconnect silicon carbide (4H-SiC) junction field effect transistors and resistors (JFET-R). This HiTEC 2021 submission updates on-going efforts at NASA Glenn spanning two subsequent prototype IC generations “11 and 12” to increase both complexity and durability of these ICs. Increased chip complexities of around 1000 transistors/chip for Gen. 11 and near 3000 transistors/chip for Gen. 12 are made possible by reductions in minimum layout feature sizes (including resistor width shrinkage from 6 μm to 2 μm) coupled with enlarged die size (from 3 × 3 mm to 5 × 5 mm). Gen. 11 ICs electrically tested to date include an 8-bit delta-sigma analog to digital converter (ADC) as well as upscaled random access memory (RAM) and nearly 1 kbit read only memory (ROM). However, Gen. 11 prototype ICs exhibited significantly lower yield and durability than Gen. 10 ICs. Development of revised processing is being investigated towards mitigating these issues in subsequent Gen. 12 fabrication run currently in progress.}
    }
  4. Neudeck, P. G., Spry, D. J., Krasowski, M. J., Prokop, N. F., Beheim, G. M., Chen, L.-Y. and Chang, C. W. (2018). Yearlong 500 C Operational Demonstration of Up-scaled 4H-SiC JFET Integrated Circuits . Additional Conferences. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{neudeck2018yearlong,
      title = {Yearlong 500 C Operational Demonstration of Up-scaled 4H-SiC JFET Integrated Circuits},
      author = {Neudeck, Philip G. and Spry, David J. and Krasowski, Michael J. and Prokop, Norman F. and Beheim, Glenn M. and Chen, Liang-Yu and Chang, Carl W.},
      booktitle = {Additional Conferences},
      volume = {2018},
      pages = {000071-000078},
      year = {2018},
      doi = {10.4071/2380-4491-2018-hiten-000071},
      abstract = {Abstract This work describes recent progress in the design, processing, and testing of significantly up-scaled 500 °C durable 4H-SiC junction field effect transistor (JFET) integrated circuit (IC) technology with two-level interconnect undergoing development at NASA Glenn Research Center. For the first time, stable electrical operation of semiconductor ICs for over one year at 500 °C in air atmosphere is reported. These groundbreaking durability results were attained on two-level interconnect JFET demonstration ICs with 175 or more transistors on each chip. This corresponds to a more than 7-fold increase in 500 °C-durable circuit complexity from the 24 transistor ring oscillator ICs reported at HiTEC 2016 [1]. These results advance the technology foundation for realizing long-term durable 500 °C ICs with increased functional capability for combustion engine sensing and control, planetary exploration, deep-well drilling monitoring, and other harsh-environment applications.}
    }
  5. Neudeck, P. G., Spry, D. J., Chen, L., Lukco, D., Chang, C. W. and Beheim, G. M. (2017). Experimentally Observed Electrical Durability of 4H-SiC JFET ICs Operating from 500 C to 700 C . Materials Science Forum. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{neudeck2017experimentally,
      title = {Experimentally Observed Electrical Durability of 4H-SiC JFET ICs Operating from 500 C to 700 C},
      author = {Neudeck, Philip G. and Spry, David J. and Chen, Liangyu and Lukco, Dorothy and Chang, Carl W. and Beheim, Glenn M.},
      booktitle = {Materials Science Forum},
      volume = {897},
      pages = {567-570},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.897.567},
      abstract = {Prolonged 500 °C to 700 °C electrical testing data from 4H-SiC junction field effect transistor (JFET) integrated circuits (ICs) are combined with post-testing microscopic studies in order to gain more comprehensive understanding of the durability limits of the present version of NASA Glenn's extreme temperature microelectronics technology. The results of this study support the hypothesis that T ≥ 500 °C durability-limiting IC failure initiates with thermal stress-related crack formation where dielectric passivation layers overcoat micron-scale vertical features including patterned metal traces.}
    }
  6. Sauder, J., Hilgemann, E., Johnson, M., Parness, A., Bienstock, B., Hall, J., Kawata, J. and Stack, K. (2017). Automaton Rover for Extreme Environments . NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 20170002798. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{sauder2017automaton,
      title = {Automaton Rover for Extreme Environments},
      author = {Sauder, Jonathan and Hilgemann, Evan and Johnson, Michael and Parness, Aaron and Bienstock, Bernie and Hall, Jeffery and Kawata, Jessie and Stack, Kathryn},
      number = {20170002798},
      institution = {NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory},
      year = {2017},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170002798},
      abstract = {Almost 2,300 years ago the ancient Greeks built the Antikythera automaton. This purely mechanical computer accurately predicted past and future astronomical events long before electronics existed1. Automata have been credibly used for hundreds of years as computers, art pieces, and clocks. However, in the past several decades automata have become less popular as the capabilities of electronics increased, leaving them an unexplored solution for robotic spacecraft. The Automaton Rover for Extreme Environments (AREE) proposes an exciting paradigm shift from electronics to a fully mechanical system, enabling longitudinal exploration of the most extreme environments within the solar system. }
    }
  7. O'Neill, P. M., Golge, S. and Slaba, T. C. (2015). Badhwar-O'Neill 2014 Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux Model Description . NASA. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{nasa2014implementing,
      title = {Badhwar-O'Neill 2014 Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux Model Description},
      author = {O'Neill, P. M. and Golge, S. and Slaba, T. C.},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {2015},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150003026},
      abstract = {For the analysis of radiation risks to astronauts and planning exploratory space missions, accurate energy spectrum of galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) is necessary. Characterization of the ionizing radiation environment is challenging because the interplanetary plasma and radiation fields are modulated by solar disturbances and the radiation doses received by astronauts in interplanetary space are likewise influenced. A model of the Badhwar‐O'Neill 2011 (BO11) GCR environment, which is represented by GCR deceleration potential theta, has been derived by utilizing all of the GCR measurements from balloons, satellites, and the newer NASA Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE). In the BO11 model, the solar modulation level is derived from the mean international sunspot numbers with time‐delay, which has been calibrated with actual flight instrument measurements to produce better GCR flux data fit during solar minima. GCR fluxes provided by the BO11 model were compared with various spacecraft measurements at 1 AU, and further comparisons were made for the tissue equivalent proportional counters measurements at low Earth orbits using the high‐charge and energy transport (HZETRN) code and various GCR models. For the comparison of the absorbed dose and dose equivalent calculations with the measurements by Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) at Gale crater on Mars, the intensities and energies of GCR entering the heliosphere were calculated by using the BO11 model, which accounts for time‐dependent attenuation of the local interstellar spectrum of each element. The BO11 model, which has emphasized for the last 24 solar minima, showed in relatively good agreement with the RAD data for the first 200 sols, but it was resulted in to be less well during near the solar maximum of solar cycle 24 due to subtleties in the changing heliospheric conditions. By performing the error analysis of the BO11 model and the optimization in reducing overall uncertainty, the resultant BO13 model corrects the fit at solar maxima as well as being accurate at solar minima. The BO13 model is implemented to the NASA Space Cancer Risk model for the assessment of radiation risks. Overall cumulative probability distribution of solar modulation parameters represents the percentile rank of the average interplanetary GCR environment, and the probabilistic radiation risks can be assessed for various levels of GCR environment to support mission design and operational planning for future manned space exploration missions.}
    }
  8. Kremic, T., Vento, D., Lalli, N. and Palinski, T. (2014). Extreme Environment Simulation - Current and New Capabilities to Simulate Venus and Other Planetary Bodies . IEEE Aerospace Conference, 20140013390. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{kremic2014extreme,
      title = {Extreme Environment Simulation - Current and New Capabilities to Simulate Venus and Other Planetary Bodies},
      author = {Kremic, Tibor and Vento, Dan and Lalli, Nick and Palinski, Timothy},
      booktitle = {IEEE Aerospace Conference},
      number = {20140013390},
      pages = {1-9},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {2014},
      doi = {10.1109/aero.2014.6836350},
      abstract = {Science, technology, and planetary mission communities have a growing interest in components and systems that are capable of working in extreme (high) temperature and pressure conditions. Terrestrial applications range from scientific research, aerospace, defense, automotive systems, energy storage and power distribution, deep mining and others. As the target environments get increasingly extreme, capabilities to develop and test the sensors and systems designed to operate in such environments will be required. An application of particular importance to the planetary science community is the ability for a robotic lander to survive on the Venus surface where pressures are nearly 100 times that of Earth and temperatures approach 500C. The scientific importance and relevance of Venus missions are stated in the current Planetary Decadal Survey. Further, several missions to Venus were proposed in the most recent Discovery call. Despite this interest, the ability to accurately simulate Venus conditions at a scale that can test and validate instruments and spacecraft systems and accurately simulate the Venus atmosphere has been lacking. This paper discusses and compares the capabilities that are known to exist within and outside the United States to simulate the extreme environmental conditions found in terrestrial or planetary surfaces including the Venus atmosphere and surface. The paper then focuses on discussing the recent additional capability found in the NASA Glenn Extreme Environment Rig (GEER). The GEER, located at the NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio, is designed to simulate not only the temperature and pressure extremes described, but can also accurately reproduce the atmospheric compositions of bodies in the solar system including those with acidic and hazardous elements. GEER capabilities and characteristics are described along with operational considerations relevant to potential users. The paper presents initial operating results and concludes with a sampling of investigations or tests that have been requested or expected.}
    }
  9. Beckley, B. W., Motil, C. A., Henry, I. M., Chi, I. S. and Sprouse, M. D. (2024). Glenn Extreme Environments Rig (GEER) Facility Users Guide . Planetary Science Technology Symposium, 20240012869. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{beckley2024glenn,
      title = {Glenn Extreme Environments Rig (GEER) Facility Users Guide},
      author = {Beckley, Blake W. and Motil, Craig A. and Henry, Ian M. and Chi, Ike S. and Sprouse, Mark D.},
      booktitle = {Planetary Science Technology Symposium},
      number = {20240012869},
      institution = {NASA},
      address = {Cleveland, OH},
      year = {2024},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240012869},
      abstract = {The Glenn Extreme Environment Rig (GEER) is a large capacity pressure vessel capable of simulating high pressure and temperature conditions with a specified, custom mixture of gas. The chamber is certified for operation in physical and chemical conditions representative of the surface conditions of Venus. It can accommodate large scientific or engineering test articles while maintaining the specified conditions indefinitely. The user-configurable gas supply is capable of handling a mixture of up to nine independent streams for injection directly into the vessel. GEER is supported in part by NASA’s Planetary Science Division under the Science Mission Directorate and is available for use by the commercial, academic, and research communities.
    
    GEER was operationally commissioned in November of 2014. At that time, it successfully maintained the temperature, pressure, and chemistry of the Venus surface atmosphere. In the spring of 2015, GEER began operations for engineering and scientific research. Since then, over 20 tests have been successfully conducted in the chamber with a variety of atmospheric test conditions.}
    }
  10. Chen, L.-Y., Neudeck, P. G., Meredith, R. D., Lukco, D., Spry, D. J., Nakley, L. M., Phillips, K. G., Beheim, G. M. and Hunter, G. W. (2018). Sixty Earth-Days Test of a Prototype Pt/HTCC Alumina Package in Simulated Venus Environment . Additional Conferences, 20180006758. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{chen2018sixty,
      title = {Sixty Earth-Days Test of a Prototype Pt/HTCC Alumina Package in Simulated Venus Environment},
      author = {Chen, Liang-Yu and Neudeck, Philip G. and Meredith, Roger D. and Lukco, Dorothy and Spry, David J. and Nakley, Leah M. and Phillips, Kyle G. and Beheim, Glenn M. and Hunter, Gary W.},
      booktitle = {Additional Conferences},
      volume = {2018},
      number = {20180006758},
      pages = {000015-000021},
      institution = {NASA},
      address = {Albuquerque, New Mexico},
      year = {2018},
      doi = {10.4071/2380-4491-2018-hiten-0000015},
      abstract = {Abstract This paper presents experimental results of a prototype high temperature co-fired ceramic (HTCC) package with Au/Pt metallization in a three-phase harsh environment test that culminated with 60-day demonstration in simulated Venus surface environment of 465 °C with corrosive atmosphere at 90 bar pressure. The prototype package is based on previously developed and reported HTCC package successfully tested with multiple analog and digital silicon carbide (SiC) high temperatures semiconductor integrated circuits (ICs) at NASA Glenn Research Center in 500 °C Earth air ambient for over ten thousands hours, and short-term tested at temperatures above 800 °C. The three-phase harsh environment test started with 48 hours in 465 °C Earth air, followed by 48 hours in 465 °C nitrogen at 90 bar pressure and 1400 hours in simulated Venus surface environment of 465 °C with corrosive atmosphere at 90 bar. Initial analytical results of the package materials and surfaces after exposure to Venus environment are discussed to assess the stability of the packaging materials in the tested environments. The test in simulated Venus environment was implemented in the NASA Glenn Extreme Environment Rig (GEER). The results of this study suggest that an effective encapsulation of areas of surface metallization and vicinities may help to improve electrical performance of a HTCC alumina packaging system in Venus environment.}
    }
  11. Lauenstein, J.-M., Neudeck, P. G., Ryder, K. L., Wilcox, E. P., Chen, L., Carts, M. A., Wrbanek, S. Y. and Wrbanek, J. D. (2019). Room Temperature Radiation Testing of a 500 C Durable 4H-SiC JFET Integrated Circuit Technology . IEEE Nuclear and Space Radiation Effects Conference (NSREC). Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{lauenstein2019room,
      title = {Room Temperature Radiation Testing of a 500 C Durable 4H-SiC JFET Integrated Circuit Technology},
      author = {Lauenstein, Jean-Marie and Neudeck, Philip G. and Ryder, Kaitlyn L. and Wilcox, Edward P. and Chen, Liangyu and Carts, Martin A. and Wrbanek, Susan Y. and Wrbanek, John D.},
      booktitle = {IEEE Nuclear and Space Radiation Effects Conference (NSREC)},
      pages = {1-7},
      year = {2019},
      doi = {10.1109/redw.2019.8906528},
      abstract = {Total ionizing dose (TID) and single-event effect (SEE) room-temperature radiation test results are presented for developmental prototype 4H-SiC junction field effect transistor (JFET) semiconductor integrated circuits (ICs) that have demonstrated prolonged operation in extremely high-temperature (500 °C) environments. The devices tested demonstrated over 7 Mrad(Si) TID tolerance and no destructive SEE susceptibility.}
    }