Skip to content

NASA configuration rendering of Canadarm3 on Gateway, not a photograph: no flight hardware has been built for public view. The rendering shows the eXploration Large Arm anchored to an external robotics interface on the module at lower left, with the smaller eXploration Dexterous Arm mounted mid-boom, and the free end effector extended over the lunar limb. Both ends of the large arm carry identical anchoring hands, which is how the arm walks the length of Gateway without a mobile base NASA/Alberto Bertolin, Bradley Reynolds. Public domain (NASA / US government work).

Canadarm3 is the Canadian Space Agency contribution to the Lunar Gateway, a robotic system rather than a single arm. It comprises an eXploration Large Arm, an eXploration Dexterous Arm, specialized tools, a tool and orbital replacement unit caddy, ground control systems, and AI-based control and mission planning software [4]. MDA Space in Brampton, Ontario holds the contract. Delivery is stated as no earlier than 2029 and the system is in development; the ISAM catalog records both arms as in development with a scheduled first use in 2028 [1].

The design driver is the communication geometry. Gateway operates about 400,000 km from Earth, where the link is limited and delayed enough that continuous ground supervision is not available, so Canadarm3 is specified as a goal-driven autonomous system able to maintain itself and make decisions with minimal human intervention [6]. Gateway is also uncrewed for long periods, which removes the on-board operator that Canadarm2 relies on.

ParameterValueSource
eXploration Large Arm reach8.5 m[5], [1]
eXploration Dexterous Arm reach3 m[1]
Degrees of freedom, each arm7 (3 shoulder, 1 elbow, 3 wrist)[5], [1]
Mass, large arm715 kg, estimated
Boom exterior diameter0.23 m, carbon fiber composite
Joint rotationabout 360 deg per joint
Unloaded tip speed0.10 m/s
Loaded tip speednot yet set
Cameras4 color 4K, at the boom swivels and hands
Sensingforce-moment sensors, collision avoidance, 3D Vision Sensor
Controlautonomous, with ground or Gateway override

Rows with no marker are from [5].

ParameterCanadarmCanadarm2Canadarm3Source
Length15 m17 m8.5 m[5], [2]
Mass410 kg1497 kg715 kg estimated[5], [2]
Diameter33 cm35 cm23 cm
Degrees of freedom6 (2 shoulder, 1 elbow, 3 wrist)7 (3 shoulder, 1 elbow, 3 wrist)7 (3 shoulder, 1 elbow, 3 wrist)[5], [2]
Joint rotationelbow limited to 160 deg270 deg each direction, 540 deg totalabout 360 deg per joint
Unloaded tip speed60 cm/s37 cm/s10 cm/s
Loaded tip speed6 cm/s2 to 15 cm/sto be determined
Structure16 layers carbon fiber epoxy19 layers carbon fiber thermoplasticcarbon fiber composite
Sensingnoneforce-moment sensors, collision avoidanceforce-moment sensors, collision avoidance, 3D Vision Sensor
Cameras24 color4 color 4K
ControlShuttle crewground or ISS crewautonomous, with ground or Gateway override
Repairon Earthin space, replaceable sectionsself-detaching sections repaired inside Gateway[5], [2]
OperatorUnited StatesCanada and United StatesCanada

Rows with no marker are from [5].

Sources differ on camera count: the CSA comparative table gives four 4K color cameras on the boom swivels and hands [5], while a review of the Canadarm series gives six 4K cameras [2].

ParameterValueSource
HostLunar Gateway[4]
Distance from Earth at which the system operatesabout 400,000 km[6]
Deliveryno earlier than 2029, subject to the Gateway schedule[4]
First use in the ISAM catalog2028[1]
Phase A, system definitioncomplete[7]
Phases B and C contract, 26 July 2021$35.3 million, Gateway External Robotics Interfaces preliminary and detailed design[7]
Phases C and D contract, 27 June 2024$1 billion, final design plus construction, assembly, integration and test[8]
Phase C and D period of performanceto March 2030[8]
Canadian supply chainmore than 200 companies[8]

The 2024 award supersedes the phase description in the 2021 release: MDA Space is now contracted for the flight system itself, comprising the large arm, the dexterous arm, specialized tools and the ground segment, together with commissioning support from Brampton and training for on-orbit operations [8]. The program was valued at more than $1 billion in total in the 2021 release [7], a figure the 2024 contract alone now matches [8].

Canadarm3 has no fixed end. Like Canadarm2 it walks end over end, but where Canadarm2 requires the Mobile Base System and Mobile Transporter to traverse the ISS truss, Canadarm3 covers the full length of Gateway by walking alone [5]. Each arm end attaches to specially designed interfaces on the Gateway exterior, and the anchoring hands plug into those interfaces to take power, data and video [4].

The two arms divide the work by scale. The eXploration Large Arm has a reach of 8.5 m in seven degrees of freedom, terminating in a low profile end effector with latches and umbilicals, and is used for berthing modules and inspecting Gateway [1]. The eXploration Dexterous Arm has a reach of 3 m in seven degrees of freedom with a dexterous end effector and umbilical, and handles orbital replacement unit and payload replacement, handling and inspection in the way Dextre does on the ISS. Both are scheduled for first use in 2028 in that catalog, against a CSA delivery date of no earlier than 2029 [4].

Unloaded tip speed is 10 cm/s, against 37 cm/s for Canadarm2 and 60 cm/s for the Shuttle arm [5]. The loaded figure has not been set. Joint rotation is about 360 degrees per joint, where Canadarm2 joints travel 270 degrees in each direction, and the arm is 23 cm in diameter against 35 cm for Canadarm2, and 715 kg against 1497 kg [5].

Power reaches the arm through the Gateway External Robotics Interfaces, the same anchoring points that carry data and video [4]. No power draw, bus voltage or energy figure has been published for either arm.

No thermal design information has been published for Canadarm3.

No processor, radiation tolerance approach or data handling specification has been published. The AI-based control and mission planning software is named as a deliverable alongside the hardware and the ground segment [6], but no architecture has been released. Onboard autonomy for capture of an uncooperative target remains an open research problem across the field rather than a solved one carried into flight [3].

Canadarm3 is the first space manipulator specified to run without continuous supervision. Control is autonomous, with override available from the ground or from Gateway crew [5], and tasks can be commanded by robotics flight controllers in Canada, by crew on board, or by Gateway’s own autonomous system [4]. Some tasks are performed autonomously with no human intervention at all.

The sensing that supports this is a step beyond Canadarm2. Both arms carry force-moment sensors and collision avoidance, as Canadarm2 does, plus a 3D Vision Sensor that Canadarm2 does not have [5]. Four 4K color cameras are mounted at the boom swivels and the hands, against Canadarm2’s four standard color cameras at the elbow sides and hands.

Self-maintenance is part of the autonomy specification rather than a separate capability. The system is designed to maintain itself in space and swap out its own parts [4], with sections that detach themselves so they can be repaired inside Gateway [5], [2]. Canadarm2 by comparison has replaceable sections but requires an external operation to change them [5].

Power, data and video all pass through the Gateway External Robotics Interfaces at the anchoring hands [4]. No band allocation or data rate has been published. The operational constraint that shapes the design is the 400,000 km distance to Earth and the limited, delayed link it produces [6].

The system delivers specialized tools for maintenance and science tasks together with a tool and orbital replacement unit caddy [6], [4]. The arms catch visiting spacecraft, relocate Gateway modules, maintain, repair and inspect the station, assist astronauts during spacewalks, and enable science in lunar orbit [4]. No instrument list or tool inventory has been published.

Three command paths are defined: robotics flight controllers in Canada, crew on board Gateway, and Gateway’s autonomous system [4]. Autonomous operation is the baseline with ground and crew override retained [5]. Safing, hibernation and fault response modes are not described in any published source.

Ground control systems are a delivered element of the Canadarm3 system rather than an adaptation of existing infrastructure [4]. Robotics flight controllers operate from Canada. Canadarm2 by contrast is controlled from the ground or by ISS crew, and the SRMS only by Shuttle crew [2]. No planning cycle, tooling or latency figure has been published.

The Gateway External Robotics Interfaces were planned for delivery ahead of the arms themselves [7].

The lineage is continuous in supplier and discontinuous in operating concept. MDA built Canadarm2 and Canadarm3 under contract to CSA, and its former subsidiary Spar Aerospace built the Shuttle Remote Manipulator System (SRMS) [2]. What changes at Canadarm3 is who decides: the SRMS was flown by Shuttle astronauts, Canadarm2 by ground operators or ISS crew, and Canadarm3 by itself [5], [2]. Space manipulator surveys place Canadarm3 alongside the other current programs moving toward autonomous capture and servicing of targets that were not prepared for it [3].

References

  1. Mulvaney, J., Arney, D., Williams, C., Morel, J., Stockdale, C., Whitlock, C. and Balaji, V. (2025). In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (ISAM) State of Play, 2025 Edition . NASA, 20250008988. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{nasa2025space,
      title = {In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (ISAM) State of Play, 2025 Edition},
      author = {Mulvaney, John and Arney, Dale and Williams, Christina and Morel, Jose and Stockdale, Christopher and Whitlock, Christopher and Balaji, Vishruth},
      number = {20250008988},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {2025},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250008988},
      abstract = {The future of spaceflight will yield increasingly more ambitious missions to support civil, national security, 
    and commercial space sectors. Achieving some of these missions will not be feasible by launching an 
    integrated, fully functioning system on a single launch vehicle. Future science and human exploration 
    missions will require payloads that are larger than any foreseeable launch vehicle fairing, national security 
    missions will require persistent assets that are mobile and resilient, and commercial space missions will 
    require cost-effective ways to update to the latest technology on orbit.
    
    In-space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing (ISAM) can vastly expand the performance, availability, 
    and lifetime of space systems compared to the traditional paradigm of launching an asset with no intent 
    to ever interact with it again. ISAM capabilities foster an ecosystem that changes the space operations 
    paradigm, creating the foundation for sustainable exploration and serving as a multiplier for other 
    capabilities like space logistics, power generation, and reusability.
    
    Previous achievements in ISAM have enabled ambitious human and robotic space missions. The 
    assembly, operation, and maintenance of NASA’s International Space Station (ISS); servicing missions to
    the Hubble Space Telescope (HST); and Northrop Grumman’s Mission Extension Vehicle (MEV) 
    demonstrate the dramatic operational missions that can be achieved using ISAM capabilities. Many 
    current and upcoming flight demonstrations are advancing areas that will enable the next generation of 
    civil, national security, and commercial space missions.
    
    This document describes the current state of ISAM missions, activities, and technologiesto the best ability 
    of the authors. Compiling and organizing the available ISAM capabilities will help mission designers 
    incorporate ISAM technologies into their concepts, create the starting point for technology development 
    plans and roadmaps, and provide technologists a survey of the field they are developing. This document 
    divides the ISAM capabilities into 11 functional capability areas that describe the functions or activities 
    that can be performed in space using ISAM.}
    }
  2. Won, D., So, B.-R. and Kim, H.-D. (2022). A Survey of Space Robotic Manipulator . Journal of Space Technology and Applications, 4. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{won2022survey,
      title = {A Survey of Space Robotic Manipulator},
      author = {Won, Daehee and So, Byung-Rok and Kim, Hae-Dong},
      journal = {Journal of Space Technology and Applications},
      volume = {2},
      number = {4},
      pages = {257--267},
      year = {2022},
      doi = {10.52912/jsta.2022.2.4.257},
      abstract = {In the 1970s, space robotics was used to attach a robotic manipulator to the first planetary exploration satellite of the Soviet Union. Since then, it has been developed to use various on-orbit services such as space debris removal, parts replacement/repairing, refueling, orbit changing, and construction of a space station in Earth orbit. In planetary exploration projects such as the Moon and Mars, various space robotic manipulators are being designed and developed to be used in the collection of samples and building bases on Mars. Recently, the use of various space robotic manipulators to perform missions in the Earth orbit or on the planet has been increasing. Countries with state-of-the-art space technology plan and implement new space-related projects. In this article, we would like to introduce the technology development trends and functions of space robot manipulators that have been used in various space challenge projects in advanced space technology countries.}
    }
  3. Papadopoulos, E., Aghili, F., Ma, O. and Lampariello, R. (2021). Robotic Manipulation and Capture in Space: A Survey . Frontiers in Robotics and AI. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{papadopoulos2021robotic,
      title = {Robotic Manipulation and Capture in Space: A Survey},
      author = {Papadopoulos, Evangelos and Aghili, Farhad and Ma, Ou and Lampariello, Roberto},
      journal = {Frontiers in Robotics and AI},
      volume = {8},
      pages = {686723},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.3389/frobt.2021.686723},
      abstract = {Space exploration and exploitation depend on the development of on-orbit robotic capabilities for tasks such as servicing of satellites, removing of orbital debris, or construction and maintenance of orbital assets. Manipulation and capture of objects on-orbit are key enablers for these capabilities. This survey addresses fundamental aspects of manipulation and capture, such as the dynamics of space manipulator systems (SMS), i.e., satellites equipped with manipulators, the contact dynamics between manipulator grippers/payloads and targets, and the methods for identifying properties of SMSs and their targets. Also, it presents recent work of sensing pose and system states, of motion planning for capturing a target, and of feedback control methods for SMS during motion or interaction tasks. Finally, the paper reviews major ground testing testbeds for capture operations, and several notable missions and technologies developed for capture of targets on-orbit.}
    }
  4. (2020). CSA: About Canadarm3. asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/canadarm3/about.asp
    BibTeX
    @misc{csaabout,
      title = {CSA: About Canadarm3},
      organization = {asc-csa.gc.ca},
      year = {2020},
      url = {https://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/canadarm3/about.asp}
    }
  5. (2026). CSA: Comparative table of Canadarm, Canadarm2 and Canadarm3. asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/iss/canadarm2/canadarm-canadarm2-canadarm3-comparat...
    BibTeX
    @misc{csacomparative,
      title = {CSA: Comparative table of Canadarm, Canadarm2 and Canadarm3},
      organization = {asc-csa.gc.ca},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/iss/canadarm2/canadarm-canadarm2-canadarm3-comparative-table.asp}
    }
  6. (2026). MDA Space: Canadarm3. mda.space/canadarm3
    BibTeX
    @misc{mdaspacecanadarm3,
      title = {MDA Space: Canadarm3},
      organization = {mda.space},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://mda.space/canadarm3}
    }
  7. (2026). MDA Space: MDA awarded next contract for flagship Canadarm3 program. mda.space/article/mda-awarded-next-contract-for-flagship-canadarm3-pr...
    BibTeX
    @misc{mdaspacemda,
      title = {MDA Space: MDA awarded next contract for flagship Canadarm3 program},
      organization = {mda.space},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://mda.space/article/mda-awarded-next-contract-for-flagship-canadarm3-program/}
    }
  8. (2026). MDA Space: $1B contract to design and deliver the Canadarm3 flight system. mda.space/article/mda-space-awarded-1b-contract-to-design-and-deliver...
    BibTeX
    @misc{mdaspace1b,
      title = {MDA Space: $1B contract to design and deliver the Canadarm3 flight system},
      organization = {mda.space},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://mda.space/article/mda-space-awarded-1b-contract-to-design-and-deliver-canadarm3-flight-system}
    }