LISTER
Program pages Firefly Aerospace: Blue Ghost Mission 1
NASA/Firefly Aerospace. Public domain (NASA / US government work).
Overview
Section titled “Overview”LISTER is a pneumatic drill and heat flow probe built by Honeybee Robotics for a Texas Tech University investigation, flown as one of ten NASA payloads on Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost Mission 1 to Mare Crisium [1], [4]. It measures regolith temperature and thermal conductivity at a series of depths; heat flow is the product of the thermal gradient and the conductivity over the interval penetrated. Before this flight, lunar heat flow had been measured in situ only by the Apollo 15 and 17 crews with a handheld drill [1].
It reaches depth without a rotating auger. A stainless steel tube is spooled off a reel and yielded straight on the way out, becoming a stiff boom; nitrogen fed through the tube leaves a nozzle at its leading end and blows regolith out of the way as the boom advances [1], [3]. The hole this produces is typically 6 cm across or wider against a 6.4 mm tube [4].
The instrument was mounted below the lander platform, which was a thermal decision rather than a packaging one: at an 18.5 N landing site, direct solar heating of the instrument housing had to be avoided [4].
Specifications
Section titled “Specifications”| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism mass | under 9 kg, against a 15 kg instrument allocation | [3] |
| Mechanism envelope | 32 x 33 x 43 cm | |
| Coiled tubing | stainless steel, 6.4 mm diameter | [1], [3] |
| Excavated hole diameter | typically 6 cm or larger | [4] |
| Needle sensor | 28 mm long, 2.8 mm diameter, platinum resistance thermometers | [2], [3] |
| Average power, quiescent | 33 W | [3] |
| Average power, drilling | 88 W | |
| Heat flux accuracy requirement | 10 percent | |
| Depth requirement | at least three measurements between 1 and 2 m | |
| Design depth | 2 m threshold, 3 m objective | |
| Working gas | nitrogen | [1] |
| Monitoring | two below-deck cameras | [4] |
Mission profile
Section titled “Mission profile”| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Landing | 2 March 2025, Mare Crisium | [1] |
| Operations start | two Earth days after landing | |
| Depth after two further days | 0.96 m, seven measurement depths | |
| Progress slowed | at 0.94 m | |
| Operations suspended | spacecraft heating under the midday Sun | |
| Operations resumed | seven Earth days later | |
| Final depth | 0.98 m, one additional measurement set | |
| Depths measured | 8 | [2] |
| Endogenic heat flow, early result | 13 to 14 mW/m2 | [1] |
The preflight plan called for measurements at 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 m, with descent between depths expected to take a few tens of seconds unless rocks too large to be blown out were encountered [4]. That is what stopped the drill. Below 0.94 m, downward progress slowed as clasts and pebbles too large or heavy to be lofted accumulated in the bottom of the hole; the obstruction is inferred from the penetration rate rather than observed [1].
Ground test against flight
Section titled “Ground test against flight”The instrument was qualified in a vacuum chamber against simulant beds whose rock content was deliberately set high, about 33 percent by volume, so that rock encounters would be frequent rather than avoided by luck [3]. Conservatism was added because the size and frequency of rocks in the real subsurface could not be predicted from available data, and because drilling performance cannot be analyzed in high fidelity and has to be verified empirically.
| Condition | Depth reached | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Fines-only simulant, vacuum chamber, 1 g | 2.2 m | [3] |
| Rocky simulant, about 33 percent rocks by volume, vacuum chamber, 1 g | 1.35 m | |
| Mare Crisium regolith | 0.98 m | [1] |
The flight result falls below the conservative ground case as well as the optimistic one. Against 1.35 m in the rocky simulant and the 2 m threshold requirement [3], the instrument stopped at 0.98 m [1], halted by an obstruction of exactly the kind the rocky test was designed to represent.
Approach
Section titled “Approach”At each target depth the gas jet stops and the needle sensor is pushed into unexcavated regolith at the bottom of the hole, so the material it measures has not been disturbed by the excavation that reached it [3]. The sequence at each depth takes two hours: an hour of passive equilibration, 30 minutes of constant-power heating, and 30 minutes of cooling [2]. Equilibrium regolith temperature comes from extrapolating the first hour’s trend to infinite time by the Bullard method; conductivity comes from fitting a finite-element heat transfer model to the heating and cooling curve.
A rock small enough to move is dealt with by dithering, an oscillatory motion of the boom that pushes it aside, demonstrated in ground testing and carried into the flight concept of operations [3], [4].
Mobility
Section titled “Mobility”None beyond the boom’s own advance.
Power and energy
Section titled “Power and energy”Average power is a requirement rather than a measurement: 33 W quiescent, 88 W during drilling, within a 15 kg, lander-agnostic package [3]. Neither the gas quantity carried nor the energy consumed per meter is published.
Thermal
Section titled “Thermal”The mounting below the lander platform exists to keep the instrumentation housing thermally stable at a low-latitude site by keeping it out of direct sunlight [4]. Deployment was timed to begin only once the Sun had risen high enough for the lander to cast a shadow on the regolith beneath it. Even so, the lander heating up at midday is what suspended science operations for seven Earth days [1].
The measurement itself is defeated by thermal noise near the surface. The uppermost half meter or so fluctuates with the diurnal and annual insolation cycles, and the 2 m threshold depth was set to escape those waves [2], [3]. A model driven by site ephemeris and Diviner surface temperature history places the depth below which annual fluctuation falls under 0.1 K at 0.6 m, and the modulation of that annual wave by the Moon’s 18.6-year precession happened to be at its minimum during the mission, which is what makes a heat flow value recoverable from measurements that stopped at 0.98 m [1].
Compute and avionics
Section titled “Compute and avionics”Not published. Platinum resistance thermometers in the needle sensor are the only electronics described.
Autonomy
Section titled “Autonomy”None. The drill descends one depth at a time under ground control: after each set of measurements, data and camera images are downlinked, the operations team has 90 minutes to assess instrument state and data quality, and only then is the next descent commanded [4].
Communications
Section titled “Communications”Through the lander.
Payload and instruments
Section titled “Payload and instruments”The needle sensor is the instrument: a 28 mm long, 2.8 mm diameter probe carrying platinum resistance thermometers, mounted at the gas nozzle [2], [3]. Two cameras below the lander deck monitor the excavation [4].
Modes of operation
Section titled “Modes of operation”Excavation, with gas flowing and the boom advancing; measurement, with the gas off and the probe pressed into undisturbed bottom-hole regolith; and dithering, an oscillatory motion used to displace small rocks [3], [4]. The suspension across the lunar midday was a response to spacecraft thermal conditions rather than a designed mode [1].
Ground operations
Section titled “Ground operations”Run by the LISTER surface operation team, which reviews each depth’s data and imagery inside a 90-minute window before authorizing the next descent [4].
Technologies developed
Section titled “Technologies developed”Pneumatic excavation was used to penetrate a planetary subsurface for the first time, and LISTER became the first robotically operated device to actively excavate lunar regolith and the first to take science measurements in situ at multiple subsurface depths on the Moon [1]. The technique’s advantage is speed and the absence of a rotating cutting element; its demonstrated limit is that it moves only what the gas jet can lift, so a bed of coarse clasts ends the hole.
The measurement result is an early endogenic heat flow of 13 to 14 mW per square meter at Mare Crisium, obtained by inverting eight depth measurements against a thermal model [1]. The authors describe it as preliminary, with a fuller inversion and an uncertainty estimate outstanding, and the separation of endogenic flow from insolation transients rests on that model rather than on measurements taken below the thermal skin depth.
References
Section titled “References”References
- Ngo, P., Sanigepalli, V., Zasadzien, M., Castle, C., Wang, A., Heidt, N., Shmavonian, A., Chow, P., Dearing, S., Becerra, J., McCormick, M., Thomas, L., Morrison, P., Zacny, K. and Nagihara, S. (2022). Engineering and Test Development of Heat Flow Probe and Pneumatic Drill for Lunar Lander Mission to Mare Crisium, 2587. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{ngo2022pneumatic, title = {Engineering and Test Development of Heat Flow Probe and Pneumatic Drill for Lunar Lander Mission to Mare Crisium}, author = {Ngo, P. and Sanigepalli, V. and Zasadzien, M. and Castle, C. and Wang, A. and Heidt, N. and Shmavonian, A. and Chow, P. and Dearing, S. and Becerra, J. and McCormick, M. and Thomas, L. and Morrison, P. and Zacny, K. and Nagihara, S.}, year = {2022}, booktitle = {53rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference}, number = {2587}, url = {https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2022/pdf/2587.pdf} } - Nagihara, S., Sanasarian, L., Ngo, P. and Zacny, K. (2024). Surface Operation Plan for the Heat Flow Measurement on the Blue Ghost Mission to Mare Crisium, 5016. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{nagihara2024surface, title = {Surface Operation Plan for the Heat Flow Measurement on the Blue Ghost Mission to Mare Crisium}, author = {Nagihara, S. and Sanasarian, L. and Ngo, P. and Zacny, K.}, year = {2024}, booktitle = {Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group}, number = {5016}, url = {https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/leag2024/pdf/5016.pdf} } - Nagihara, S., Zacny, K., Ngo, P., Sanasarian, L., Misra, R., Grott, M., Knollenberg, J., Smrekar, S. E., Siegler, M. A. and Neal, C. R. (2025). Early Findings from the First Robotic In-Situ Measurements of Subsurface Temperature and Thermal Conductivity Down to 1-m Depth on the Blue Ghost Mission to Mare Crisium, 5038. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{nagihara2025early, title = {Early Findings from the First Robotic In-Situ Measurements of Subsurface Temperature and Thermal Conductivity Down to 1-m Depth on the Blue Ghost Mission to Mare Crisium}, author = {Nagihara, S. and Zacny, K. and Ngo, P. and Sanasarian, L. and Misra, R. and Grott, M. and Knollenberg, J. and Smrekar, S. E. and Siegler, M. A. and Neal, C. R.}, year = {2025}, booktitle = {Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group}, number = {5038}, url = {https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/leag2025/pdf/5038.pdf} } - Nagihara, S., Zacny, K., Ngo, P., Sanasarian, L., Misra, R., Grott, M., Knollenberg, J., Smrekar, S., Siegler, M. and Neal, C. (2026). LISTER Deployment on Blue Ghost Mission One to Mare Crisium of the Moon, 1351. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{nagihara2026lister, title = {LISTER Deployment on Blue Ghost Mission One to Mare Crisium of the Moon}, author = {Nagihara, S. and Zacny, K. and Ngo, P. and Sanasarian, L. and Misra, R. and Grott, M. and Knollenberg, J. and Smrekar, S. and Siegler, M. and Neal, C.}, year = {2026}, booktitle = {57th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference}, number = {1351}, url = {https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2026/pdf/1351.pdf} }
Further reading
- (2026). Firefly Aerospace: Blue Ghost Mission 1. fireflyspace.com/missions/blue-ghost-mission-1
- NASA. (2020). Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE), Revision G. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. Source
- Grant H. Heiken, David T. Vaniman and Bevan M. French. (1991). Lunar Sourcebook: A User's Guide to the Moon. Cambridge University Press. Source