Skip to content

Colmena

The Colmena-1 flight payload wrapped in multi-layer insulation on its aluminum lander interface plate. The closed bucket and shroud that hold the five micro-rovers sit on the catapult arms above the plate, and the electrical connector to the Peregrine lander is at the plate's forward edge LINX, Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM. Used with attribution on the rights holder’s terms.

Colmena is a swarm of five micro-rovers built by the Laboratory of Space Instrumentation (LINX) at the Institute of Nuclear Sciences of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, flown as an integrated payload on Astrobotic’s Peregrine Mission One [8]. Each rover is a 12 cm disc weighing about 56 g. The five together weigh 280 g, and the whole payload, including the module that stores, deploys and talks to them, is 608 g.

The name is Spanish for beehive, and the architecture follows from that analogy. The project’s stated end is mineral prospection: lunar surface resources are scattered over large areas rather than concentrated in deposits, and the response is to distribute the work across many small, simple units that survey individually and act collectively [8]. Regolith depth itself varies by an order of magnitude across the near side, from a few meters to tens of meters, by both radar and crater-count surveys [4][6], which is the kind of spatial variability a scattered, individually surveying swarm is suited to sampling. Colmena-1 is the first of at least three missions [8][13]. It was a proof of concept for miniaturization and a probe of the lunar surface limit layer; Colmena-2, planned for 2028, is to deploy at least three prospection rover prototypes with a positioning system, beyond-the-horizon navigation and one night in hibernation; Colmena-3, planned for 2031, adds sample collection and transport and survival across several diurnal cycles.

Peregrine launched on 8 January 2024 on the first flight of Vulcan Centaur [2]. A helium pressure control valve lost seal capability, most likely through vibration-loosened threads in a joint internal to the valve, and let helium flow uncontrolled into the oxidizer tank until it ruptured about 92 minutes after separation, ruling out a lunar landing [2]. The team recovered attitude control and operated the spacecraft for ten days and fourteen hours in cislunar space before a controlled reentry over the South Pacific on 18 January [2]. Colmena was never deployed.

ParameterValue
Rovers5, identical
Rover massabout 56 g each, 280 g total
Rover envelopeapproximately 12 x 12 x 4 cm
Central torus thicknessapproximately 1 cm
Wheels2, plus four skates
Solar panelson both faces
Deployment module mass328 g
Payload total mass608 g
Standby temperature range-180 to 150 C
Operating temperature range0 to 120 C
Radiation survival requirement120 days in cislunar space outside the magnetopause
Catapult range10 to 15 m
Compressive force per wheelunder 5 g

Source: [8]. Speed, drive torque, battery capacity, generation, processor and radio parameters are not published.

ParameterValueSource
LanderAstrobotic Peregrine[8]
Launch8 January 2024, Vulcan Centaur maiden flight[2]
Anomalyhelium pressure control valve loss of seal, oxidizer tank rupture about 92 minutes after separation[2]
Duration operated10 days 14 hours[2]
Distance traveledabout 860,000 km[2]
Reentry18 January 2024, South Pacific[2]
Technical objectives met75 percent, by the project’s own accounting[8]

With landing impossible, the payload was turned on in cruise, which it had not been designed to do and which was itself a thermal problem. Every operational mode was exercised, telecommunications were run, telemetry and thermal data were acquired to validate the thermal architecture, and the electronics were checked for single event effects after crossing the Van Allen belts. The project’s own accounting of 75 percent [8] covers design, construction, qualification, launch survival and that cruise operation. It carries no per-objective breakdown, and every objective that required contact with the lunar surface is among the missing quarter.

Each rover is a disc with two wheels and four skates, reversible about its mid-plane, with solar panels on both faces so it works whichever way up it lands [8]. That symmetry is not a preference; it is forced by the deployment method, and it costs the design a doubled set of solar panels.

The wheels are not primarily for locomotion. The rovers were designed to interact with the regolith in the ways their science required rather than to travel: measuring the resistance of the regolith to wheel movement at different torques is itself one of the measurements [8].

The reason the mobility problem is different at this scale is quantified. A heavy rover compresses regolith until the irregular larger grains mechanically lock and the ground behaves as a solid [10]. A Colmena rover applies under 5 g of compressive force per wheel, and at that loading the intermediate, micron-scale fraction of the dust may behave as a dry fluid-like upper layer instead [8]. Whether it does is one of the questions the mission existed to answer.

The rovers ride inside a bucket under a removable shroud, mounted on the arms of a catapult in the Telemetry, Telecommunications and Deployment Module, which stays bolted to the lander deck for the whole mission [8]. The catapult is armed by hand during payload integration and holds that mechanical energy until a cutting system, commanded from the ground through the module’s own electronics, releases it.

It throws the rovers 10 to 15 m from the lander [8]. The distance is set by two constraints: the rovers must clear the lander’s shadow, where there is no solar power, and they must land outside the area of regolith disturbed by the descent thrusters, which would otherwise impede them [8]. That hazard is documented from Apollo 12: the nearby Surveyor 3 spacecraft, 155 m from the landing site, accumulated significant dust deposited by the Lunar Module’s descent engine [7]. A third property is a benefit rather than a requirement. The catapult distributes the rovers randomly, which is what their collective task needs. The price is that their landing orientation cannot be foreseen, which is where the reversible architecture comes from.

The shroud and bucket also serve as thermal and ultraviolet protection during the cislunar cruise, and the shroud is vented for the rapid decompression inside the launch fairing [8].

Solar panels on both faces of each rover, with a power supply system and an emergency power backup on the central electronics plane [8]. No generation figure, battery capacity or duty cycle is published.

The rovers were designed for -180 to 150 C in standby and 0 to 120 C in operation, with the shroud and bucket providing thermal protection until deployment [8]. Validating the thermal architecture was one of the objectives actually met, from telemetry acquired during the unplanned cruise operation, though no temperature values from that operation are published.

Each rover carries an onboard computer, power supply and backup, data preprocessing and storage, a telecommunications system, two motors, and its sensors, all on the central plane of the torus [8]. The deployment module’s electronics are on a single flexible printed circuit board beneath the bucket: power regulation and conditioning, onboard computer, data storage, telecommunications and antenna, housekeeping, thermal sensors, and the arm, trigger and cutting subsystems.

Radiation tolerance was approached by design rather than by shielding. At a 608 g payload mass no conventional shielding was affordable, so new approaches in design, materials, integration technique and local shielding were developed instead [8]. Passive survival of the electronics through the Van Allen belts, and their resilience to single event effects in cislunar space, were among the objectives the cruise operation validated. No processor part, memory size or dose figure is published.

Self-organization is the project’s premise, consistent with the case made elsewhere for swarm robotics in space missions: autonomous units with only local sensing and communication, no centralized control, cooperating toward a shared task [3]. The ballistic deployment makes some of it unavoidable here: five rovers scattered at unknown positions and unknown orientations cannot be driven individually from Earth. Each carries its own computer and preprocesses its own data [8]. No navigation method, hazard response or fault behavior is published, and none was exercised.

The deployment module is the communications hub. It is the interface between the rovers and the lander, and through the lander to the Colmena ground control center, and it preprocesses and compresses both science and engineering data before passing it on [8].

Radio is also an instrument here. The rovers exchange signals at several frequencies among themselves and with the module, and the attenuation of those signals is one of the measurements of the dusty plasma layer.

Each rover carries sensors embedded in the torus that sample time-varying ambient magnetic fields between 1 Hz and 100 kHz, three-axis accelerometers, three-axis magnetometers, temperature sensors, and an electromagnetic plasma probing subsystem [8]. The deployment module contributes environment and structural temperature sensing and works cooperatively with the rovers as a limit layer plasma probe.

The target is the layer within roughly 20 to 30 cm of the surface. Ultraviolet photons charge the uppermost regolith positively, producing a vertical electrostatic field [5][11]; photoelectric yield measurements on returned Apollo and Luna dust grains show the effect growing by an order of magnitude from sub-micron to several-micron grain radii before leveling off [1]. Sub-micron grains ejected by that field mix with the solar wind to form a dusty plasma, are observed jumping centimeters above the surface under ultraviolet or plasma exposure [12], and either levitate or move ballistically, with a Debye length near the surface of the order Colmena targets [8][11]. Simulations in the paper show this plasma coupling appreciably to the mechanics, electronics and telecommunications of a device immersed in it, which is exactly where a 12 cm rover sits and where a conventional rover does not.

The planned measurements were the magnetic field fluctuation spectrum from 1 to 10^5 Hz, radio attenuation between rovers, induced potential differences between structural pieces, temperatures very near the surface, and regolith resistance to wheel motion at different torques [8].

Stowed under the shroud during launch, cruise and landing; deployed by catapult; and operating on the surface as a swarm [8]. Only the stowed mode was flown, and the payload was additionally operated in an unplanned cruise mode outside the magnetosphere, which exercised all of its operational modes electrically without any of them acting on regolith.

The Colmena Ground Control Center commands the payload through the lander’s electrical and logical interface, which also supplies power and carries telemetry [8]. The catapult is fired only after separate arm and trigger commands from the ground.

The transferable result is a demonstrated design point: a functioning lunar rover, with computer, power, storage, telecommunications, motors and a sensor suite, at 56 g and 12 cm, qualified for launch vibration and shock and for the cislunar radiation environment without conventional shielding [8]. Micro-scale guidance and control components for spacecraft, built from microminiature sensors, actuators and VLSI microcomputers, were proposed as a distinct engineering line as early as 1992 [9]; Colmena-1 is a flown instance at the low end of that scale. The mass budget forced new solutions in design, materials, integration technique and shielding, and those are what the project carries forward into Colmena-2.

The deployment architecture is the second result. Arming a catapult during integration and firing it from the ground removes any deployment mechanism from the rovers themselves, places them clear of both the lander shadow and the thruster-disturbed regolith, and randomizes their distribution, at the cost of a mechanically symmetric rover with twice the solar panels.

More than 250 students across engineering, physics, actuarial science, mathematics, geology and design took part over eight years, and the project treats that as one of its outputs [8].

References

  1. Abbas, M. M., Tankosic, D., Craven, P. D., Spann, J. F., LeClair, A. and West, E. A. (2007). Lunar Dust Charging by Photoelectric Emissions . Planetary and Space Science, 20070014798. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{abbas2007lunar,
      title = {Lunar Dust Charging by Photoelectric Emissions},
      author = {Abbas, M. M. and Tankosic, D. and Craven, Paul D. and Spann, J. F. and LeClair, A. and West, E. A.},
      journal = {Planetary and Space Science},
      volume = {55},
      number = {20070014798},
      pages = {953-965},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {2007},
      doi = {10.1016/j.pss.2006.12.007},
      abstract = {The lunar surface is covered with a thick layer of sub-micron/micron size dust grains formed by meteoritic impact over billions of years. The fine dust grains are levitated and transported on the lunar surface, as indicated by the transient dust clouds observed over the lunar horizon during the Apollo 17 mission. Theoretical models suggest that the dust grains on the lunar surface are charged by the solar UV radiation as well as the solar wind. Even without any physical activity, the dust grains are levitated by electrostatic fields and transported away from the surface in the near vacuum environment of the Moon. The current dust charging and levitation models, however, do not fully explain the observed phenomena. Since the abundance of dust on the Moon s surface with its observed adhesive characteristics has the potential of severe impact on human habitat and operations and lifetime of a variety of equipment, it is necessary to investigate the charging properties and the lunar dust phenomena in order to develop appropriate mitigating strategies. Photoelectric emission induced by the solar UV radiation with photon energies higher than the work function of the grain materials is recognized to be the dominant process for charging of the lunar dust, and requires measurements of the photoelectric yields to determine the charging and equilibrium potentials of individual dust grains. In this paper, we present the first laboratory measurements of the photoelectric efficiencies and yields of individual sub-micron/micron size dust grains selected from sample returns of Apollo 17, and Luna 24 missions, as well as similar size dust grains from the JSC-1 simulants. The measurements were made on a laboratory facility based on an electrodynamic balance that permits a variety of experiments to be conducted on individual sub-micron/micron size dust grains in simulated space environments. The photoelectric emission measurements indicate grain size dependence with the yield increasing by an order of magnitude for grains of sub-micron to several micron size radii, at which it reaches asymptotic values. The yield for large size grains is found to be more than an order of magnitude higher than the bulk measurements on lunar fines reported in the literature.}
    }
  2. Astrobotic Technology. (2024). Peregrine Mission 1 Post-Mission Report . Astrobotic Technology. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{astrobotic2024peregrine,
      title = {Peregrine Mission 1 Post-Mission Report},
      author = {{Astrobotic Technology}},
      institution = {Astrobotic Technology},
      month = {August},
      year = {2024},
      url = {https://www.astrobotic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/PM1_Post-Mission-Report_2024-1.pdf}
    }
  3. Bandyopadhyay, S. (2018). Interesting Applications of Swarm Robotics in Space. ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210016543
    BibTeX
    @misc{bandyopadhyay2018interesting,
      title = {Interesting Applications of Swarm Robotics in Space},
      author = {Bandyopadhyay, Saptarshi},
      year = {2018},
      url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210016543},
      abstract = {UNKNOWN}
    }
  4. Bart, G. D., Nickerson, R. D., Lawder, M. T. and Melosh, H. J. (2011). Global survey of lunar regolith depths from LROC images . Icarus. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{bart2011global,
      title = {Global survey of lunar regolith depths from LROC images},
      author = {Bart, Gwendolyn D. and Nickerson, Ryan D. and Lawder, Matthew T. and Melosh, H. J.},
      journal = {Icarus},
      volume = {215},
      pages = {485-490},
      year = {2011},
      doi = {10.1016/j.icarus.2011.07.017}
    }
  5. Colwell, J. E., Batiste, S., Horányi, M., Robertson, S. and Sture, S. (2007). Lunar surface: Dust dynamics and regolith mechanics . Reviews of Geophysics. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{colwell2007lunar,
      title = {Lunar surface: Dust dynamics and regolith mechanics},
      author = {Colwell, J. E. and Batiste, S. and Horányi, Mihály and Robertson, Scott and Sture, Stein},
      journal = {Reviews of Geophysics},
      volume = {45},
      pages = {RG2006},
      publisher = {American Geophysical Union (AGU)},
      year = {2007},
      doi = {10.1029/2005rg000184},
      abstract = {The lunar surface is characterized by a collisionally evolved regolith resulting from meteoroid bombardment. This lunar soil consists of highly angular particles in a broad, approximately power law size distribution, with impact‐generated glasses. The regolith becomes densified and difficult to excavate when subjected to lunar quakes or, eventually, manned and unmanned activity on the surface. Solar radiation and the solar wind produce a plasma sheath near the lunar surface. Lunar grains acquire charge in this environment and can exhibit unusual behavior, including levitation and transport across the surface because of electric fields in the plasma sheath. The fine component of the lunar regolith contributes to the operational and health hazards posed to planned lunar expeditions. In this paper we discuss the mechanical response of the regolith to anticipated exploration activities and review the plasma environment near the lunar surface and the observations, models, and dynamics of charged lunar dust.}
    }
  6. Fa, W. and Wieczorek, M. A. (2012). Regolith thickness over the lunar nearside: Results from Earth-based 70-cm Arecibo radar observations . Icarus, 2. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{fa2012regolith,
      title = {Regolith thickness over the lunar nearside: Results from Earth-based 70-cm Arecibo radar observations},
      author = {Fa, Wenzhe and Wieczorek, Mark A.},
      journal = {Icarus},
      volume = {218},
      number = {2},
      pages = {771--787},
      publisher = {Elsevier BV},
      year = {2012},
      doi = {10.1016/j.icarus.2012.01.010}
    }
  7. Katzan, C. M. and Edwards, J. L. (1991). Lunar Dust Transport and Potential Interactions with Power System Components . NASA Lewis Research Center, NASA CR-4404. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{katzan1991lunar,
      title = {Lunar Dust Transport and Potential Interactions with Power System Components},
      author = {Katzan, Cynthia M. and Edwards, Jonathan L.},
      number = {NASA CR-4404},
      institution = {NASA Lewis Research Center},
      year = {1991},
      doi = {10.2172/10181067},
      abstract = {The lunar surface is covered by a thick blanket of fine dust. This dust may be readily suspended from the surface and transported by a variety of mechanisms. As a consequence, lunar dust can accumulate on sensitive power components, such as photovoltaic arrays and radiator surfaces, reducing their performance. In addition to natural mechanisms, human activities on the Moon will disturb significant amounts of lunar dust. Of all the mechanisms identified, the most serious is rocket launch and landing. The return of components from the Surveyor 3 provided a rare opportunity to observe the effects of the nearby landing of the Apollo 12 Lunar Module. The evidence proved that significant dust accumulation occurred on the Surveyor at a distance of 155 m. From available information on particle suspension and transport mechanisms, a series of models was developed to predict dust accumulation as a function of distance from the lunar module. The accumulation distribution was extrapolated to a future Lunar Lander scenario. These models indicate that accumulation is expected to be substantial even as far as 2 km from the landing site. Estimates of the performance penalties associated with lunar dust coverage and photovoltaic arrays are presented. Because of the lunar dust adhesive and cohesive properties, the most practical dust defensive strategy appears to be the protection of sensitive components from the arrival of lunar dust by location, orientation, or barriers.}
    }
  8. Medina-Tanco, G. (2024). Validation of the lunar mission Colmena-1 in deep space . International Astronautical Congress, IAC-24-A3,2B,5,x91388. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{medina2024validation,
      title = {Validation of the lunar mission Colmena-1 in deep space},
      author = {Medina-Tanco, Gustavo},
      booktitle = {International Astronautical Congress},
      number = {IAC-24-A3,2B,5,x91388},
      pages = {170-174},
      year = {2024},
      doi = {10.52202/078357-0023}
    }
  9. Mettler, E. and Hadaegh, F. (1992). Micro-Guidance and Control Synthesis: New Components, Architectures, and Capabilities . JPL Open Repository. Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{mettler1992micro,
      title = {Micro-Guidance and Control Synthesis: New Components, Architectures, and Capabilities},
      author = {Mettler, E. and Hadaegh, F.},
      publisher = {JPL Open Repository},
      year = {1992},
      url = {https://dataverse.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:2014/35463}
    }
  10. Mitchell, J. K., Carrier, W. D. I., Houston, W. N., Scott, R. F., Bromwell, L. G., Durgunoglu, H. T., Hovland, H. J., Treadwell, D. D. and Costes, N. C. (1972). Soil mechanics . NASA, NASA SP-315. Source
    BibTeX
    @techreport{mitchell1972soilb,
      title = {Soil mechanics},
      author = {Mitchell, James K. and Carrier, W. D., III and Houston, William N. and Scott, Ronald F. and Bromwell, L. G. and Durgunoglu, H. T. and Hovland, H. John and Treadwell, D. D. and Costes, Nicholas C.},
      number = {NASA SP-315},
      pages = {xi-xii},
      institution = {NASA},
      year = {1972},
      doi = {10.1017/cbo9780511815553.002},
      abstract = {This book teaches the principles of soil mechanics to undergraduates, along with other properties of engineering materials, to which the students are exposed simultaneously. Using the critical state method of soil mechanics to study the mechanical behavior of soils requires the student to consider density alongside effective stresses, permitting the unification of deformation and strength characteristics. This unification aids the understanding of soil mechanics. This book explores a one-dimensional theme for the presentation of many of the key concepts of soil mechanics - density, stress, stiffness, strength, and fluid flow - and includes a chapter on the analysis of one-dimensional consolidation, which fits nicely with the theme of the book. It also presents some theoretical analyses of soil-structure interaction, which can be analyzed using essentially one-dimensional governing equations. Examples are given at the end of most chapters, and suggestions for laboratory exercises or demonstrations are given.}
    }
  11. Popel, S. I., Zelenyi, L. M., Golub', A. P. and Dubinskii, A. Y. (2018). Lunar dust and dusty plasmas: Recent developments, advances, and unsolved problems . Planetary and Space Science. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{popel2018lunar,
      title = {Lunar dust and dusty plasmas: Recent developments, advances, and unsolved problems},
      author = {Popel, S. I. and Zelenyi, L. M. and Golub', A. P. and Dubinskii, A. Yu.},
      journal = {Planetary and Space Science},
      volume = {156},
      pages = {71-84},
      year = {2018},
      doi = {10.1016/j.pss.2018.02.010}
    }
  12. Wang, X., Schwan, J., Hsu, H.-W., Grün, E. and Horányi, M. (2016). Dust charging and transport on airless planetary bodies . Geophysical Research Letters. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{wang2016dust,
      title = {Dust charging and transport on airless planetary bodies},
      author = {Wang, Xu and Schwan, J. and Hsu, Hsiang-Wen and Grün, E. and Horányi, M.},
      journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
      volume = {43},
      pages = {6103-6110},
      year = {2016},
      doi = {10.1002/2016gl069491},
      abstract = {Abstract We report on laboratory experiments to shed light on dust charging and transport that have been suggested to explain a variety of unusual phenomena on the surfaces of airless planetary bodies. We have recorded micron‐sized insulating dust particles jumping to several centimeters high with an initial speed of ~0.6 m/s under ultraviolet illumination or exposure to plasmas, resulting in an equivalent height of ~0.11 m on the lunar surface that is comparable to the height of the so‐called lunar horizon glow. Lofted large aggregates and surface mobilization are related to many space observations. We experimentally show that the emission and re‐absorption of photoelectron and/or secondary electron at the walls of microcavities formed between neighboring dust particles below the surface are responsible for generating unexpectedly large negative charges and intense particle‐particle repulsive forces to mobilize and lift off dust particles.}
    }
  13. (2026). LINX UNAM: Proyecto Colmena. linx.nucleares.unam.mx/COLMENA-1.html
    BibTeX
    @misc{linxunamproyecto,
      title = {LINX UNAM: Proyecto Colmena},
      organization = {linx.nucleares.unam.mx},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://linx.nucleares.unam.mx/COLMENA-1.html}
    }