Skip to content

Rosalind Franklin ground test model during the March 2023 drilling campaign in Italy, in which the drill reached 1.7 m into Mars-analog ground and returned samples. The drill box stands vertically ahead of the front face with the string in the soil, and the triple-bogie suspension carries six flexible grousered wheels, each on its own steering drive and its own articulated deployment drive ESA/S. Corvaja.

Rosalind Franklin is the ESA ExoMars rover, a solar-powered six-wheeled vehicle carrying a 2 m rotary drill and an internal analytical laboratory [1]. Rover mass is about 310 kg, of which 26 kg is instrument payload, a figure that excludes the drill and the sample processing mechanisms [1]. The vehicle is the only planetary surface machine designed to acquire cores from 2 m depth and deliver them, crushed, to onboard spectrometers and a mass spectrometer without exposing the material to the ambient environment [12], [13]. The 2004 Phase A concept run for ESA by an MDA-led team was a 240 kg rover with a different chassis and is not the flown configuration [3].

Launch was suspended in 2022 when cooperation with Roscosmos ended, removing the Russian descent module [10]. ESA is building a European entry, descent and landing module reusing the qualified onboard computer, the radar Doppler altimeter and the parachute system, with NASA providing the launch service, elements of the landing propulsion and radioisotope heater units for the rover [10].

ParameterValueSource
Massabout 310 kg[1]
Instrument payload mass26 kg, excluding drill and sample handling
Locomotion formula6 x 6 x 6 + 6 (supported, driven, steered, deployed)
Suspensiontriple bogie, no central differential
Wheel diameter28.5 cm without grousers
Wheel width12.0 cm
Wheel typeflexible, grousered
Average ground pressureabout 10 kPa
Steering modespoint turn, double Ackermann, crab
Wheel-walking gaitavailable on all six deployment drives[1], [2]
Drill depth rating0 to 2 m[12], [4], [5]
Drill typerotary, no percussion[1]
Core sample sizeabout 3 cm long by 1 cm diameter[12]
Rock strength demonstratedup to 150 MPa unconfined compressive strength[1]
Crushed particle sizefew to about 500 um, median 250 um
MOMA single-use ovens32[6]
Power sourcesolar array[1], [11]
ParameterValueSource
Earliest launchOctober 2028[10]
Transfertwo years, landing 2030
Launch serviceNASA
Landing siteOxia Planum[7]
Nominal surface lifetime218 sols, about 7 Earth months[1]
Reference surface mission traverseabout 1.5 km
Experiment cycles6
Vertical surveys2
Samples per experiment cycle2, one surface and one from 1.5 m
Vertical survey sample depths0, 50, 100, 150, 200 cm
Assumed traverse rateabout 100 m per sol
Assumed drilling rate50 cm per sol
Communication sessions2 per sol via Trace Gas Orbiter

The reference surface mission is a contractual object as well as a science plan: ESA specified that industry deliver a rover able to execute it within the nominal mission duration, and demonstration by simulation and test is a requirement [1]. It begins with egress in either of two directions, a 10 sol commissioning phase near the platform, and a move of about 60 m out of the descent engine blast contamination zone before the drill and the analytical laboratory drawer may be opened. The first laboratory operation is a drill blank run for calibration and organic cleanliness assessment, and only after it completes does biosignature search begin. Experiment cycle spacing is assumed to grow in 100 m steps, 100 m to the first site, a further 200 m to the second, for a total of about 1.5 km [1]. The drill requirement set counts 7 experiment cycles and at least 2 vertical surveys to 2 m with four sample acquisitions each, a minimum of 17 samples [12].

Oxia Planum was selected for a wide exposure of Noachian-age Fe/Mg phyllosilicates overlain by a younger dark resistant unit, with the clay-bearing material accessible to a 2 m drill [7].

The kinematic configuration is a six-wheel triple bogie with locomotion formula 6 x 6 x 6 + 6: six supporting wheels, six driven, six steered, plus six articulated deployment or knee drives [1]. The three bogies passively adapt to rough terrain and provide platform stability without a central differential. Available maneuvers are straight drive, turn on the spot, double-Ackermann steering and diagonal crabbing, the last used to translate sideways along an outcrop for imaging. Lander accommodation constrained the wheels to 28.5 cm diameter without grousers and 12.0 cm width [1]. Flexible wheels were adopted to offset the traction penalty of small diameter: their deformation enlarges the contact patch, brings average ground pressure to about 10 kPa, and absorbs impact loads [1]. That figure is above the 5.75 kPa average computed for the MER and MSL wheels, both of which nonetheless embedded in unconsolidated material, at Purgatory Ripple and in megaripple deposits respectively.

Wheel-walking is the mitigation for that margin. It is a coordinated rototranslational gait that drives the wheel motors and the deployment joints together, so each wheel train is advanced by the knee joint while the wheel is turned, producing forward motion by a different force path than pure rolling [2]. Tests reported for the ExoMars configuration showed improved dynamic stability during egress, better traction on loose soil where normal driving slips, and increased slope gradeability [1]. Simulation of the ExoMars 6 x 6 x 6 configuration gave 25 degrees climbed with wheel-walking against 18 degrees with normal driving. The cost is power: wheel-walking is less efficient in energy per meter than rolling, which makes locomotion mode selection a decision problem rather than a default. Slip ratio, the standard input to that decision, cannot be estimated during wheel-walking by the usual wheel-odometry difference because the wheels are not rolling continuously, and an estimator based on the acceleration of the wheel train was developed for this case.

The 2004 Phase A locomotion requirement set, for a 240 kg concept rover, specified uphill, downhill and crosshill driving on loose sandy 25 degree slopes, 0.3 m obstacle height, and at least 100 m/h maximum speed for short-duration recovery situations, over sampling sites 0.5 to 2 km apart [3]. Those are requirements on an earlier design, not measured capabilities of the flight vehicle.

Force-torque sensors at the wheel drives have been evaluated on ESA planetary rover testbeds as an input to traction control and terrain assessment, using the ExoMars Testing Rover, a reduced-scale platform with the same actuated-suspension kinematics [9].

The rover generates electrical power from a deployable solar array and carries batteries and heater units sized to survive the Martian night [11]. Regional mobility of several kilometers is stated to rely on solar array electrical power [1]. Array area, peak generation in watts and battery capacity in watt-hours are not published. NASA is supplying radioisotope heater units for the rebuilt mission [10].

Preservation of organic and volatile content sets the thermal requirements on the sample path rather than component survival alone. The drill carries thermocouples close to the tip. Mars chamber tests through simulated stratigraphic columns containing ice lenses of 0 to 35 percent water content showed drilling-induced temperature rises of order 20 C in continuous cutting, reduced to 5 C or less using a variable cutting law that alternates short cutting periods with dwell time for thermal dissipation, at the cost of time [1]. Subsurface material at mid-latitudes oscillates between -30 and -80 C at 0.5 m depth and averages about -50 C deeper, so the drilling strategy can be set to keep the sample cold throughout acquisition. Crushing is scheduled very early in the morning, when the analytical laboratory drawer is at its coldest, to preserve the organic and volatile fractions, and the crushing station temperature is monitored before and throughout the operation. Drill string overnight parking was tested in a Mars atmospheric chamber at -110 C: the tool was driven to full penetration, stopped, left in the simulated subsurface overnight, and restarted and extracted the next morning.

Processor part, memory and data handling architecture for the rover are not published. The onboard computer of the descent module is identified only as a qualified item reused from the suspended configuration [10]. The rover computer performs onboard analysis of MicrOmega hyperspectral cubes, examining absorption bands per pixel to identify mineral grains and assign them as targets for Raman and MOMA laser desorption observations, which places band-fitting over a 250 x 256 pixel by 320 spectral step cube inside the rover’s own compute budget [1].

Ground control designates targets from compressed stereo imagery returned by the mast cameras, and the rover computes its own navigation solution over the resulting digital terrain maps, with inclinometers, gyroscopes and Sun sensors for attitude and heading [11]. The design travel figure quoted by the operator for autonomous driving is about 100 m per sol, matching the traverse rate assumed in the reference surface mission [1]. Onboard science autonomy is limited but real: MicrOmega cube analysis on the rover computer selects grain targets for the two spectrometers without a ground cycle.

Locomotion mode selection is a further decision the vehicle class exposes. Rolling and wheel-walking differ in traction and in energy per meter, so choosing between them needs an onboard estimate of slip and rolling resistance, both derivable from proprioceptive sensing [2]. Force-torque sensing at the drive units has been characterized in field trials on ESA rover testbeds as an input to that estimate [9].

The nominal link is a UHF proximity relay through the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, which carries the NASA-supplied Electra UHF package for orbiter-to-surface proximity links [1]. Operations assume two sessions per sol, a morning uplink of the sol’s activities and an evening downlink of results, so all data needed to plan the next sol must reach the ground with the evening pass. TGO’s orbit is not Sun-synchronous, so session local time drifts about 30 minutes earlier per sol for three consecutive sols and then jumps about 2 hours forward, and overpass duration and data volume vary with the relative geometry [1]. Both effects constrain strategic planning: the required tasks cannot always be completed in time for the next pass, and the response is either to tailor activities to the time available or to skip a session. Infrequent communication windows are the stated reason for the rover’s autonomy level [11].

Nine Pasteur payload instruments are carried, split between mast-mounted remote sensing, subsurface sounding, drill-integrated sensing and the analytical laboratory drawer [1]. The combination is organized around the retrieval and analysis of samples from 0 to 2 m depth, which is the element that separates this payload from earlier Mars surface suites [4].

InstrumentFunctionKey parametersSource
PanCammultispectral stereo panoramic and high-resolution imagingtwo wide-angle cameras, 38.3 degree field of view, 11-position filter wheels, 150 mm stereo baseline; high resolution camera 4.8 degree field of view[4]
ISEMmast IR point spectrometer, coaligned with the PanCam high-resolution camerarecords IR spectra of reflected solar light[1]
WISDOMground-penetrating radar for subsurface structure and drill site selectionstep-frequency, 0.5 to 3.0 GHz, 3 to 10 m depth range depending on regolith dielectric properties, vertical resolution to 3 cm[5]
ADRONneutron detector for subsurface hydrogensupports drill site selection[1]
CLUPIclose-up imager on the drill boxvariable focus, images outcrops, drill fines and acquired cores
Ma_MISSIR spectrometer integrated in the drill toolimages the borehole wall as drilling proceeds, one image column per rotational step of the tool
MicrOmeganear-IR hyperspectral microscope on crushed sample250 x 256 pixels by 320 spectral steps, 0.95 to 3.65 um, 20 cm-1 sampling, 20 um per pixel
RLSRaman spectrometer on crushed sample532 nm continuous excitation, 50 um spot, about 150 to 3800 cm-1 shift, about 6 cm-1 resolution below 2000 cm-1
MOMAmass spectrometry of organics, two modes11.5 kg without margin; 32 single-use ovens 6 mm in diameter; pyrolysis to 850 C, derivatization to 600 C; 266 nm UV laser, 1 to 2 ns pulses; gas chromatograph subsystem 1.6 kg[6]

MOMA operates either as gas chromatography mass spectrometry, in which powder is dosed into one single-use oven, sealed and heated stepwise, optionally with a derivatization agent, or as laser desorption mass spectrometry, in which the pulsed UV laser fires directly on powder held in the refillable container [1], [6]. The mass spectrometer is shared between the two modes and its low mass cutoff is set at about m/z 40.

WISDOM’s depth range spans the 2 m drill reach with margin, which is what makes it the site selection instrument for drilling rather than a standalone sounder [5].

The drill assembly comprises a drill tool about 70 cm long carrying the sample acquisition device with shutter, movable piston, position and temperature sensors, and the Ma_MISS front optics of sapphire window, IR lamp, reflector and optical fiber; three extension rods of 50 cm each carrying optical and electrical contacts that route Ma_MISS signals to the spectrometer in the upper drill unit; a backup drill tool without spectrometer; and the rotation-translation group of sliding carriage motors, guides and sensors [12]. Operationally the drill box lies horizontally across the rover’s front face during traverse, is raised, rotated counterclockwise and lowered vertically to drill, then elevated, rotated clockwise and inclined to deliver the core to the laboratory inlet port [1]. The same positioning dexterity is used to aim CLUPI.

Sample transfer starts with the core sample transport mechanism, a hand that extends through a door in the rover’s front panel to receive the core [1]. Imaging by the PanCam high-resolution camera and CLUPI is limited to a window of a few minutes set by a sample contamination analysis of external rover sources. The mechanism then retracts into the analytical laboratory drawer, whose entire sample path is enclosed in an ultra clean zone sealed at positive pressure until opened on Mars. A jaw crusher produces particulate with an approximately Gaussian size distribution from a few micrometers to about 500 um, median 250 um [13]. A blank dispenser can feed individual blank samples to the crusher for contamination verification. Powder falls into one of two redundant dosing stations, both piezovibrated to improve granular flow, which meter material either onto a refillable container, a flat tray presented to the laboratory instruments, or into a single-use oven; a rotating carousel positions container and ovens under the dosing station. Two further mechanisms serve the refillable container, one flattening the powder to the correct height for the instruments and one emptying it for reuse. Off-nominal handling is built into the mechanisms. A spring-actuated hammer can shock the crusher’s fixed jaw to clear adhering material, a dedicated actuator can open the jaws to evacuate a jammed sample, both dosing stations can be bypassed, and an alternative transport container can drop the whole crushed charge at once onto the refillable container or into an oven without quantity control. If the drill string jams, counter rotation can disengage it at the last blocked element and recover the upper portion, with further drilling continued using the backup tool and any remaining rods; the positioning system carries an emergency ejection unit as a last resort, after which no further samples can be delivered.

Published sol-level operating states follow the reference surface mission structure rather than a named mode set [1]. An experiment cycle runs seven sols: approach from about 20 m with panoramic imaging on sol 1; approach to 3 m and WISDOM and ADRON subsurface sounding on sol 2; close-range imaging of lithology and texture on sol 3; sample acquisition and delivery to the laboratory on sol 4; crushing followed by MicrOmega, RLS and MOMA laser desorption first-look analysis on sol 5; further analysis on sol 6; and a subsurface scanning and drilling sequence on sol 7. A vertical survey adds drilling in 50 cm increments over three sols to reach 1.5 m, then repeats the laboratory sequence [1]. Drill string handling has a planned progression of its own: initially all segments are disassembled and stored at the end of each sol, then the tip is left in the borehole to measure the torque needed to free it in the morning, and progressively longer sections are left downhole as confidence is established, the objective being to minimize dead assembly time and give Ma_MISS more borehole observing time. Instrument-level mode selection is constrained by consumables: MOMA ovens and carrier gas are finite and are conserved where a laser desorption run can answer the question instead [6].

The rover is operated from the Rover Operations Control Centre, on a tactical cycle bounded by the two TGO passes per sol, with operations on Mars time at least for the first months [1]. Planning products for the next sol must be derived from data arriving on the evening pass. The operational chain has been rehearsed in ExoMars-like Field Testing trials: in the Atacama Desert trial a rover emulator named Charlie was driven by a local control center near the Paranal Observatory while a remote control center in the United Kingdom planned each simulated sol using only the data the rover returned [8]. Instrument teams ran the sample analysis loop with a portable Raman technology demonstrator and, in the laboratory, with a Raman simulator coupled to a replica of the sample preparation and distribution system running the same multi-point analysis algorithms as the flight instrument.

The 2 m rotary drill with in-tool spectroscopy is the program’s distinctive product: a string of one tool and three rods carrying optical and electrical contacts through every joint, so that a borehole-wall imaging spectrometer works at full depth [12], [1]. The sample chain contributes a sealed ultra clean zone spanning crushing, dosing and presentation, with blank injection as a routine contamination check rather than a pre-launch verification [13]. Wheel-walking on a triple-bogie chassis is the locomotion contribution, together with the associated body of work on locomotion mode selection and on slip estimation while walking, which is applicable to any actively articulated suspension [2]. The flexible wheel, adopted because lander accommodation capped wheel diameter, is a distinct approach to the small-wheel ground pressure problem. Force-torque sensing at the drive units, evaluated on ESA rover testbeds, follows from the same actuated-suspension architecture [9].

References

  1. Azkarate, M., Gerdes, L., Perez-del-Pulgar, C. J. and Zwick, M. (2019). Choosing the Best Locomotion Mode in Reconfigurable Rovers . Electronics, 7. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{azkarate2019choosing,
      title = {Choosing the Best Locomotion Mode in Reconfigurable Rovers},
      author = {Azkarate, Martin and Gerdes, Levin and Perez-del-Pulgar, Carlos J. and Zwick, Manuel},
      journal = {Electronics},
      volume = {8},
      number = {7},
      pages = {818},
      year = {2019},
      doi = {10.3390/electronics8070818},
      abstract = {The use of autonomous rovers for planetary exploration is crucial to traverse long distances and perform new discoveries on other planets. One of the most important issues is related to the interaction between the rover wheel and terrain, which would help to save energy and even avoid getting entrapped. The use of reconfigurable rovers with different locomotion modes has demonstrated improvement of traction and energy consumption. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to determine the best locomotion mode during the rover traverse, based on simple parameters, which would be obtained from propioceptive sensors. For this purpose, interaction of different terrains have been modelled and analysed with the ExoTeR, a scale prototype rover of the European ExoMars 2020 mission. This rover is able to perform, among others, the wheel walking locomotion mode, which has been demonstrated to improve traction in different situations. Currently, it is difficult to decide the instant time the rover has to switch from this locomotion mode to another. This paper also proposes a novel method to estimate the slip ratio, useful for deciding the best locomotion mode. Finally, results are obtained from an immersive simulation environment. It shows how each locomotion mode is suitable for different terrains and slopes and the proposed method is able to estimate the slip ratio.}
    }
  2. Bauer, R., Leung, W. and Barfoot, T. (2005). Development of a Dynamic Simulation Tool for the ExoMars Rover . International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS). Source
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings{bauer2005development,
      title = {Development of a Dynamic Simulation Tool for the ExoMars Rover},
      author = {Bauer, Robert and Leung, William and Barfoot, Timothy},
      booktitle = {International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS)},
      year = {2005},
      url = {http://asrl.utias.utoronto.ca/~tdb/bib/bauer_isairas05.pdf}
    }
  3. Bell III, J. F., Squyres, S. W., Herkenhoff, K. E., Maki, J. N., Arneson, H. M., Brown, D., Collins, S. A., Dingizian, A., Elliot, S. T., Hagerott, E. C., Hayes, A. G., Johnson, M. J., Johnson, J. R., Joseph, J., Kinch, K., Lemmon, M. T., Morris, R. V., Scherr, L., Schwochert, M., Shepard, M. K., Smith, G. H., Sohl-Dickstein, J. N., Sullivan, R. J., Sullivan, W. T. and Wadsworth, M. (2003). Mars Exploration Rover Athena Panoramic Camera (Pancam) investigation . Journal of Geophysical Research, E12. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{bell2003mars,
      title = {Mars Exploration Rover Athena Panoramic Camera (Pancam) investigation},
      author = {Bell III, J. F. and Squyres, Steven W. and Herkenhoff, K. E. and Maki, Justin N. and Arneson, H. M. and Brown, David and Collins, S. A. and Dingizian, A. and Elliot, S. T. and Hagerott, E. C. and Hayes, Alexander G. and Johnson, M. J. and Johnson, Jeffrey R. and Joseph, Jonathan and Kinch, K. and Lemmon, Mark T. and Morris, Richard V. and Scherr, L. and Schwochert, Mark and Shepard, Michael K. and Smith, G. H. and Sohl-Dickstein, J. N. and Sullivan, Robert J. and Sullivan, W. T. and Wadsworth, M.},
      journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research},
      volume = {108},
      number = {E12},
      pages = {8063},
      year = {2003},
      doi = {10.1029/2003je002070},
      abstract = {The Panoramic Camera (Pancam) investigation is part of the Athena science payload launched to Mars in 2003 on NASA's twin Mars Exploration Rover (MER) missions. The scientific goals of the Pancam investigation are to assess the high‐resolution morphology, topography, and geologic context of each MER landing site, to obtain color images to constrain the mineralogic, photometric, and physical properties of surface materials, and to determine dust and aerosol opacity and physical properties from direct imaging of the Sun and sky. Pancam also provides mission support measurements for the rovers, including Sun‐finding for rover navigation, hazard identification and digital terrain modeling to help guide long‐term rover traverse decisions, high‐resolution imaging to help guide the selection of in situ sampling targets, and acquisition of education and public outreach products. The Pancam optical, mechanical, and electronics design were optimized to achieve these science and mission support goals. Pancam is a multispectral, stereoscopic, panoramic imaging system consisting of two digital cameras mounted on a mast 1.5 m above the Martian surface. The mast allows Pancam to image the full 360° in azimuth and ±90° in elevation. Each Pancam camera utilizes a 1024 × 1024 active imaging area frame transfer CCD detector array. The Pancam optics have an effective focal length of 43 mm and a focal ratio of f /20, yielding an instantaneous field of view of 0.27 mrad/pixel and a field of view of 16° × 16°. Each rover's two Pancam “eyes” are separated by 30 cm and have a 1° toe‐in to provide adequate stereo parallax. Each eye also includes a small eight position filter wheel to allow surface mineralogic studies, multispectral sky imaging, and direct Sun imaging in the 400–1100 nm wavelength region. Pancam was designed and calibrated to operate within specifications on Mars at temperatures from −55° to +5°C. An onboard calibration target and fiducial marks provide the capability to validate the radiometric and geometric calibration on Mars.}
    }
  4. Ciarletti, V., Clifford, S., Plettemeier, D., Le Gall, A., Hervé, Y., Dorizon, S., Quantin-Nataf, C., Benedix, W.-S., Schwenzer, S., Pettinelli, E., Heggy, E., Herique, A., Berthelier, J.-J., Kofman, W., Vago, J. L., Hamran, S.-E. and the WISDOM Team. (2017). The WISDOM Radar: Unveiling the Subsurface Beneath the ExoMars Rover and Identifying the Best Locations for Drilling . Astrobiology, 6-7. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{ciarletti2017wisdom,
      title = {The WISDOM Radar: Unveiling the Subsurface Beneath the ExoMars Rover and Identifying the Best Locations for Drilling},
      author = {Ciarletti, Valérie and Clifford, Stephen and Plettemeier, Dirk and Le Gall, Alice and Hervé, Yann and Dorizon, Sophie and Quantin-Nataf, Cathy and Benedix, Wolf-Stefan and Schwenzer, Susanne and Pettinelli, Elena and Heggy, Essam and Herique, Alain and Berthelier, Jean-Jacques and Kofman, Wlodek and Vago, Jorge L. and Hamran, Svein-Erik and {the WISDOM Team}},
      journal = {Astrobiology},
      volume = {17},
      number = {6-7},
      pages = {565--584},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1089/ast.2016.1532},
      abstract = {The search for evidence of past or present life on Mars is the principal objective of the 2020 ESA-Roscosmos ExoMars Rover mission. If such evidence is to be found anywhere, it will most likely be in the subsurface, where organic molecules are shielded from the destructive effects of ionizing radiation and atmospheric oxidants. For this reason, the ExoMars Rover mission has been optimized to investigate the subsurface to identify, understand, and sample those locations where conditions for the preservation of evidence of past life are most likely to be found. The Water Ice Subsurface Deposit Observation on Mars (WISDOM) ground-penetrating radar has been designed to provide information about the nature of the shallow subsurface over depth ranging from 3 to 10 m (with a vertical resolution of up to 3 cm), depending on the dielectric properties of the regolith. This depth range is critical to understanding the geologic evolution stratigraphy and distribution and state of subsurface H2O, which provide important clues in the search for life and the identification of optimal drilling sites for investigation and sampling by the Rover's 2-m drill. WISDOM will help ensure the safety and success of drilling operations by identification of potential hazards that might interfere with retrieval of subsurface samples. Key Words: Ground penetrating radar—Martian shallow subsurface—ExoMars. Astrobiology 17, 565–584.}
    }
  5. Coates, A. J., Jaumann, R., Griffiths, A. D., Leff, C., Schmitz, N., Josset, J.-L., Paar, G., Gunn, M., Hauber, E., Cousins, C., Cross, R., Grindrod, P. M., Bridges, J. C., Balme, M., Gupta, S., Crawford, I. A., Irwin, P., Stabbins, R., Tirsch, D., Vago, J. L., Theodorou, T., Caballo-Perucha, M., Osinski, G. and the PanCam Team. (2017). The PanCam Instrument for the ExoMars Rover . Astrobiology, 6-7. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{coates2017pancam,
      title = {The PanCam Instrument for the ExoMars Rover},
      author = {Coates, Andrew J. and Jaumann, Ralf and Griffiths, Andrew D. and Leff, C.E. and Schmitz, Nicole and Josset, Jean-Luc and Paar, Gerhard and Gunn, Matthew and Hauber, Ernst and Cousins, C.R. and Cross, R.E. and Grindrod, Peter M. and Bridges, John C. and Balme, M. and Gupta, Sanjeev and Crawford, Ian A. and Irwin, P. and Stabbins, R. and Tirsch, D. and Vago, Jorge L. and Theodorou, T. and Caballo-Perucha, M. and Osinski, G.R. and {the PanCam Team}},
      journal = {Astrobiology},
      volume = {17},
      number = {6-7},
      pages = {511--541},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1089/ast.2016.1548},
      abstract = {The scientific objectives of the ExoMars rover are designed to answer several key questions in the search for life on Mars. In particular, the unique subsurface drill will address some of these, such as the possible existence and stability of subsurface organics. PanCam will establish the surface geological and morphological context for the mission, working in collaboration with other context instruments. Here, we describe the PanCam scientific objectives in geology, atmospheric science, and 3-D vision. We discuss the design of PanCam, which includes a stereo pair of Wide Angle Cameras (WACs), each of which has an 11-position filter wheel and a High Resolution Camera (HRC) for high-resolution investigations of rock texture at a distance. The cameras and electronics are housed in an optical bench that provides the mechanical interface to the rover mast and a planetary protection barrier. The electronic interface is via the PanCam Interface Unit (PIU), and power conditioning is via a DC-DC converter. PanCam also includes a calibration target mounted on the rover deck for radiometric calibration, fiducial markers for geometric calibration, and a rover inspection mirror. Key Words: Mars—ExoMars—Instrumentation—Geology—Atmosphere—Exobiology—Context. Astrobiology 17, 511–541.}
    }
  6. European Space Agency. (2024). FAQ: The 'rebirth' of ESA's ExoMars Rosalind Franklin mission. esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Exploration...
    BibTeX
    @misc{esa2024faq,
      title = {FAQ: The 'rebirth' of ESA's ExoMars Rosalind Franklin mission},
      author = {{European Space Agency}},
      year = {2024},
      url = {https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Exploration/ExoMars/FAQ_The_rebirth_of_ESA_s_ExoMars_Rosalind_Franklin_mission}
    }
  7. Esposito, F., Debei, S., Bettanini, C., Molfese, C., Arruego Rodríguez, I., Colombatti, G., Harri, A.-M., Montmessin, F., Wilson, C., Aboudan, A., Schipani, P., Marty, L., Álvarez, F. J., Apestigue, V., Bellucci, G., Berthelier, J.-J., Brucato, J. R., Calcutt, S. B., Chiodini, S., Cortecchia, F., Cozzolino, F., Cucciarrè, F., Deniskina, N., Déprez, G., Di Achille, G., Ferri, F., Forget, F., Franzese, G., Friso, E., Genzer, M., Hassen-Kodja, R., Haukka, H., Hieta, M., Jiménez, J. J., Josset, J.-L., Kahanpää, H., Karatekin, O., Landis, G., Lapauw, L., Lorenz, R., Martinez-Oter, J., Mennella, V., Möhlmann, D., Moirin, D., Molinaro, R., Nikkanen, T., Palomba, E., Patel, M. R., Pommereau, J.-P., Popa, C. I., Rafkin, S., Rannou, P., Renno, N. O., Rivas, J., Schmidt, W., Segato, E., Silvestro, S., Spiga, A., Toledo, D., Trautner, R., Valero, F., Vázquez, L., Vivat, F., Witasse, O., Yela, M., Mugnuolo, R., Marchetti, E. and Pirrotta, S. (2018). The DREAMS Experiment Onboard the Schiaparelli Module of the ExoMars 2016 Mission: Design, Performances and Expected Results . Space Science Reviews. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{esposito2018dreams,
      title = {The {DREAMS} Experiment Onboard the {Schiaparelli} Module of the {ExoMars} 2016 Mission: Design, Performances and Expected Results},
      author = {Esposito, Francesca and Debei, S. and Bettanini, C. and Molfese, C. and Arruego Rodríguez, I. and Colombatti, G. and Harri, Ari-Matti and Montmessin, Franck and Wilson, Colin and Aboudan, A. and Schipani, P. and Marty, L. and Álvarez, F. J. and Apestigue, V. and Bellucci, Giancarlo and Berthelier, Jean-Jacques and Brucato, John Robert and Calcutt, S. B. and Chiodini, S. and Cortecchia, F. and Cozzolino, F. and Cucciarrè, F. and Deniskina, N. and Déprez, G. and Di Achille, G. and Ferri, Francesca and Forget, Francois and Franzese, G. and Friso, E. and Genzer, Maria and Hassen-Kodja, R. and Haukka, Harri and Hieta, M. and Jiménez, J. J. and Josset, Jean-Luc and Kahanpää, H. and Karatekin, O. and Landis, Geoffrey and Lapauw, Laurent and Lorenz, R. and Martinez-Oter, J. and Mennella, V. and Möhlmann, D. and Moirin, D. and Molinaro, R. and Nikkanen, T. and Palomba, Ernesto and Patel, M. R. and Pommereau, J.-P. and Popa, C. I. and Rafkin, S. and Rannou, Pascal and Renno, N. O. and Rivas, J. and Schmidt, Walter and Segato, E. and Silvestro, S. and Spiga, Aymeric and Toledo, D. and Trautner, Roland and Valero, F. and Vázquez, L. and Vivat, F. and Witasse, Olivier and Yela, M. and Mugnuolo, R. and Marchetti, E. and Pirrotta, S.},
      journal = {Space Science Reviews},
      volume = {214},
      year = {2018},
      doi = {10.1007/s11214-018-0535-0}
    }
  8. Gerdes, L., Pérez del Pulgar, C., Castilla Arquillo, R. and Azkarate, M. (2025). Field Assessment of Force Torque Sensors for Planetary Rover Navigation . Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{gerdes2025field,
      title = {Field Assessment of Force Torque Sensors for Planetary Rover Navigation},
      author = {Gerdes, Levin and Pérez del Pulgar, Carlos and Castilla Arquillo, Raúl and Azkarate, Martin},
      journal = {Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems},
      volume = {111},
      year = {2025},
      doi = {10.1007/s10846-025-02324-2},
      abstract = {Abstract Proprioceptive sensors on planetary rovers serve for state estimation and for understanding terrain and locomotion performance. While inertial measurement units (IMUs) are widely used to this effect, force-torque sensors are less explored for planetary navigation despite their potential to directly measure interaction forces and provide insights into traction performance. This paper presents an evaluation of the performance and use cases of force-torque sensors based on data collected from a six-wheeled rover during tests over varying terrains, speeds, and slopes. We discuss challenges, such as sensor signal reliability and terrain response accuracy, and identify opportunities regarding the use of these sensors. The data is openly accessible and includes force-torque measurements from each of the six-wheel assemblies as well as IMU data from within the rover chassis. This paper aims to inform the design of future studies and rover upgrades, particularly in sensor integration and control algorithms, to improve navigation capabilities.}
    }
  9. Goesmann, F., Brinckerhoff, W. B., Raulin, F., Goetz, W., Danell, R. M., Getty, S. A., Siljeström, S., Mißbach, H., Steininger, H., Arevalo, J. R. D., Buch, A., Freissinet, C., Grubisic, A., Meierhenrich, U. J., Pinnick, V. T., Stalport, F., Szopa, C., Vago, J. L., Lindner, R., Schulte, M. D., Brucato, J. R., Glavin, D. P., Grand, N., Li, X., van Amerom, F. H. W. and the MOMA Science Team. (2017). The Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA) Instrument: Characterization of Organic Material in Martian Sediments . Astrobiology, 6-7. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{goesmann2017mars,
      title = {The Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA) Instrument: Characterization of Organic Material in Martian Sediments},
      author = {Goesmann, Fred and Brinckerhoff, William B. and Raulin, François and Goetz, Walter and Danell, Ryan M. and Getty, Stephanie A. and Siljeström, Sandra and Mißbach, Helge and Steininger, Harald and Arevalo, Jr., Ricardo D. and Buch, Arnaud and Freissinet, Caroline and Grubisic, Andrej and Meierhenrich, Uwe J. and Pinnick, Veronica T. and Stalport, Fabien and Szopa, Cyril and Vago, Jorge L. and Lindner, Robert and Schulte, Mitchell D. and Brucato, John Robert and Glavin, Daniel P. and Grand, Noel and Li, Xiang and van Amerom, Friso H. W. and {the MOMA Science Team}},
      journal = {Astrobiology},
      volume = {17},
      number = {6-7},
      pages = {655--685},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1089/ast.2016.1551},
      abstract = {The Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA) instrument onboard the ESA/Roscosmos ExoMars rover (to launch in July, 2020) will analyze volatile and refractory organic compounds in martian surface and subsurface sediments. In this study, we describe the design, current status of development, and analytical capabilities of the instrument. Data acquired on preliminary MOMA flight-like hardware and experimental setups are also presented, illustrating their contribution to the overall science return of the mission. Key Words: Mars—Mass spectrometry—Life detection—Planetary instrumentation. Astrobiology 17, 655–685. 1. Introduction: The Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA) Investigation 2. Science Goals 3. Objectives and Requirements 4. Instrument Top-Level Description 5. Instrument Development 5.1. Team organization 5.2. Instrument integration flow 5.3. Instrument verification 5.4. Achieved milestones and deliveries 6. Instrument Subsystems 6.1. Oven and tapping station subsystems 6.1.1. Derivatization 6.1.1.1. MTBSTFA 6.1.1.2. DMF-DMA 6.1.2. Thermochemolysis 6.1.3. Wet chemistry: storage and release of chemical agents 6.2. Gas chromatograph subsystem 6.2.1. Design requirements 6.2.2. Design overview 6.2.2.1. General architecture 6.2.2.2. Injection system 6.2.2.3. Separation of volatiles 6.2.2.4. Detection of volatiles 6.2.2.5. Gas handling system 6.2.2.6. GCMS coupling campaigns 6.3. Laser subsystem 6.3.1. Design requirements 6.3.2. Laser architecture 6.3.3. Verification data 6.4. Mass spectrometer subsystem 6.4.1. Design requirements 6.4.2. Analyzer architecture 6.4.2.1. Linear Ion Trap assembly 6.4.2.2. Detection channels 6.4.2.3. Electron Ionization Source 6.4.2.4. Fast-actuating aperture valve 6.4.2.5. Micropirani pressure sensor 6.4.2.6. Wide-Range Pump 6.4.3. Temperature control 6.4.4. Driving electronics 7. Operation of MOMA on the Surface of Mars 7.1. Expected measurement scenarios 7.2. Sequenced operational modes 7.3. Synergy with other instruments 7.3.1. Data interpretation 7.4. LDMS operations on Mars and test experiments on LDMS prototype system 7.5. Test experiments on GCMS prototype system: a case study 7.5.1. Sample and setup 7.5.2. Methods 7.5.2.1. Stepwise pyrolysis 7.5.2.2. Derivatization/thermochemolysis 7.5.2.3. GCMS parameters 7.5.3. Results and discussion 7.5.3.1. Pyrolysis 7.5.3.2. Derivatization and thermochemolysis 8. Discussion 9. Summary Acknowledgments Author Disclosure Statement References Abbreviations Used}
    }
  10. Quantin-Nataf, C., Carter, J., Mandon, L., Thollot, P., Balme, M., Volat, M., Pan, L., Loizeau, D., Millot, C., Breton, S., Dehouck, E., Fawdon, P., Gupta, S., Davis, J., Grindrod, P. M., Pacifici, A., Bultel, B., Allemand, P., Ody, A., Lozach, L. and Broyer, J. (2021). Oxia Planum: The Landing Site for the ExoMars "Rosalind Franklin" Rover Mission: Geological Context and Prelanding Interpretation . Astrobiology, 3. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{quantinnataf2021oxia,
      title = {Oxia Planum: The Landing Site for the ExoMars "Rosalind Franklin" Rover Mission: Geological Context and Prelanding Interpretation},
      author = {Quantin-Nataf, Cathy and Carter, John and Mandon, Lucia and Thollot, Patrick and Balme, Matthew and Volat, Matthieu and Pan, Lu and Loizeau, Damien and Millot, Cédric and Breton, Sylvain and Dehouck, Erwin and Fawdon, Peter and Gupta, Sanjeev and Davis, Joel and Grindrod, Peter M. and Pacifici, Andrea and Bultel, Benjamin and Allemand, Pascal and Ody, Anouck and Lozach, Loic and Broyer, Jordan},
      journal = {Astrobiology},
      volume = {21},
      number = {3},
      pages = {345--366},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.1089/ast.2019.2191},
      abstract = {The European Space Agency (ESA) and Roscosmos ExoMars mission will launch the “Rosalind Franklin” rover in 2022 for a landing on Mars in 2023.The goals of the mission are to search for signs of past and present life on Mars, investigate the water/geochemical environment as a function of depth in the shallow subsurface, and characterize the surface environment. To meet these scientific objectives while minimizing the risk for landing, a 5-year-long landing site selection process was conducted by ESA, during which eight candidate sites were down selected to one: Oxia Planum. Oxia Planum is a 200 km-wide low-relief terrain characterized by hydrous clay-bearing bedrock units located at the southwest margin of Arabia Terra. This region exhibits Noachian-aged terrains. We show in this study that the selected landing site has recorded at least two distinct aqueous environments, both of which occurred during the Noachian: (1) a first phase that led to the deposition and alteration of ∼100 m of layered clay-rich deposits and (2) a second phase of a fluviodeltaic system that postdates the widespread clay-rich layered unit. Rounded isolated buttes that overlie the clay-bearing unit may also be related to aqueous processes. Our study also details the formation of an unaltered mafic-rich dark resistant unit likely of Amazonian age that caps the other units and possibly originated from volcanism. Oxia Planum shows evidence for intense erosion from morphology (inverted features) and crater statistics. Due to these erosional processes, two types of Noachian sedimentary rocks are currently exposed. We also expect rocks at the surface to have been exposed to cosmic bombardment only recently, minimizing organic matter damage.}
    }
  11. Vago, J. L., Westall, F., Coates, A. J., Jaumann, R., Korablev, O., Ciarletti, V., Mitrofanov, I., Josset, J.-L., De Sanctis, M. C., Bibring, J.-P., Rull, F., Goesmann, F., Steininger, H., Goetz, W., Brinckerhoff, W., Szopa, C., Raulin, F., Edwards, H. G. M., Whyte, L. G., Fairen, A. G., Bibring, J.-P., Bridges, J., Hauber, E., Ori, G. G., Werner, S., Loizeau, D., Kuzmin, R. O., Williams, R. M. E., Flahaut, J., Forget, F., Rodionov, D., Svedhem, H., Sefton-Nash, E., Kminek, G., Lorenzoni, L., Joudrier, L., Mikhailov, V., Zashchirinskiy, A., Alexashkin, S., Calantropio, F., Merlo, A., Poulakis, P., Witasse, O., Bayle, O., Bayon, S., Meierhenrich, U., Carter, J., Garcia-Ruiz, J. M., Baglioni, P., Haldemann, A., Ball, A. J., Debus, A., Lindner, R., Haessig, F., Monteiro, D., Trautner, R., Voland, C., Rebeyre, P., Goulty, D., Didot, F., Durrant, S., Zekri, E., Koschny, D., Toni, A., Visentin, G., Zwick, M., van Winnendael, M., Azkarate, M. and Carreau, C. (2017). Habitability on Early Mars and the Search for Biosignatures with the ExoMars Rover . Astrobiology, 6-7. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{vago2017habitability,
      title = {Habitability on Early Mars and the Search for Biosignatures with the ExoMars Rover},
      author = {Vago, Jorge L. and Westall, Frances and Coates, Andrew J. and Jaumann, Ralf and Korablev, Oleg and Ciarletti, Valerie and Mitrofanov, Igor and Josset, Jean-Luc and De Sanctis, Maria Cristina and Bibring, Jean-Pierre and Rull, Fernando and Goesmann, Fred and Steininger, Harald and Goetz, Walter and Brinckerhoff, William and Szopa, Cyril and Raulin, Francois and Edwards, Howell G. M. and Whyte, Lyle G. and Fairen, Alberto G. and Bibring, Jean-Pierre and Bridges, John and Hauber, Ernst and Ori, Gian Gabriele and Werner, Stephanie and Loizeau, Damien and Kuzmin, Ruslan O. and Williams, Rebecca M. E. and Flahaut, Jessica and Forget, Francois and Rodionov, Daniel and Svedhem, Hakan and Sefton-Nash, Elliot and Kminek, Gerhard and Lorenzoni, Leila and Joudrier, Luc and Mikhailov, Viktor and Zashchirinskiy, Alexander and Alexashkin, Sergei and Calantropio, Fabio and Merlo, Andrea and Poulakis, Pantelis and Witasse, Olivier and Bayle, Olivier and Bayon, Silvia and Meierhenrich, Uwe and Carter, John and Garcia-Ruiz, Juan Manuel and Baglioni, Pietro and Haldemann, Albert and Ball, Andrew J. and Debus, Andre and Lindner, Robert and Haessig, Frederic and Monteiro, David and Trautner, Roland and Voland, Christoph and Rebeyre, Pierre and Goulty, Duncan and Didot, Frederic and Durrant, Stephen and Zekri, Eric and Koschny, Detlef and Toni, Andrea and Visentin, Gianfranco and Zwick, Martin and van Winnendael, Michel and Azkarate, Miguel and Carreau, Christophe},
      journal = {Astrobiology},
      volume = {17},
      number = {6-7},
      pages = {471--510},
      year = {2017},
      doi = {10.1089/ast.2016.1533},
      abstract = {The second ExoMars mission will be launched in 2020 to target an ancient location interpreted to have strong potential for past habitability and for preserving physical and chemical biosignatures (as well as abiotic/prebiotic organics). The mission will deliver a lander with instruments for atmospheric and geophysical investigations and a rover tasked with searching for signs of extinct life. The ExoMars rover will be equipped with a drill to collect material from outcrops and at depth down to 2 m. This subsurface sampling capability will provide the best chance yet to gain access to chemical biosignatures. Using the powerful Pasteur payload instruments, the ExoMars science team will conduct a holistic search for traces of life and seek corroborating geological context information. Key Words: Biosignatures—ExoMars—Landing sites—Mars rover—Search for life. Astrobiology 17, 471–510. Table of Contents 1. Article Organization 2. Introduction 2.1. ExoMars origin 2.2. A difficult adolescence 2.3. Joint program 3. Early Mars as an Exobiology Target 3.1. A first window of opportunity for life 3.2. Separate ways 3.2.1. Young Earth 3.2.2. Young Mars 3.2.3. Young Venus 3.3. Lessons for ExoMars: when and where? 4. Biosignatures: Which and How Reliable? 4.1. Morphological biosignatures 4.2. Chemical biosignatures 4.2.1. Isomerism selectivity 4.2.2. Molecular weight fingerprints 4.2.3. Bulk isotopic fractionation 4.3. Importance of geological context for boosting biosignature confidence 4.4. Life's decision points 4.5. Examples using the ExoMars biosignature score 4.5.1. Kitty's Gap, N.W. Australia 4.5.2. Josefsdal Chert, Barberton, South Africa 4.5.3. Martian Meteorite ALH84001 4.5.4. Yellowknife Bay, Mars 5. The Martian Environment and the Need for Subsurface Exploration 5.1. Results from previous missions 5.2. Degradation of organic matter 5.3. Access to molecular biosignatures 6. The ExoMars Rover and Its Pasteur Payload 6.1. From panoramic to molecular scale through nested investigations 6.2. Pasteur payload instruments 6.2.1. Panoramic camera system 6.2.2. IR spectrometer 6.2.3. Shallow ground-penetrating radar 6.2.4. Subsurface neutron detector 6.2.5. Close-up imager 6.2.6. Drill IR spectrometer 6.2.7. Subsurface drill 6.2.8. Sample preparation and distribution system 6.2.9. MicrOmega 6.2.10. Raman laser spectrometer 6.2.11. Mars organic molecule analyzer 6.3. The reference surface mission 7. A Suitable Landing Site 7.1. Scientific constraints 7.2. Engineering constraints 7.3. Planetary protection constraints 7.4. Possible locations for landing 7.4.1. Oxia Planum (18.159°N, 335.666°E; −3 km MOLA) 7.4.2. Mawrth Vallis (22.160°N, 342.050°E; −2 km MOLA) 8. Conclusions Acknowledgments Author Disclosure Statement References Abbreviations Used}
    }
  12. Veneranda, M., Lopez-Reyes, G., Saiz, J., Manrique-Martinez, J. A., Sanz-Arranz, A., Medina, J., Moral, A., Seoane, L., Ibarmia, S. and Rull, F. (2021). ExoFiT Trial at the Atacama Desert (Chile): Raman Detection of Biomarkers by Representative Prototypes of the ExoMars/Raman Laser Spectrometer . Scientific Reports. Source
    BibTeX
    @article{veneranda2021exofit,
      title = {ExoFiT Trial at the Atacama Desert (Chile): Raman Detection of Biomarkers by Representative Prototypes of the ExoMars/Raman Laser Spectrometer},
      author = {Veneranda, Marco and Lopez-Reyes, Guillermo and Saiz, Jesus and Manrique-Martinez, Jose Antonio and Sanz-Arranz, Aurelio and Medina, Jesús and Moral, Andoni and Seoane, Laura and Ibarmia, Sergio and Rull, Fernando},
      journal = {Scientific Reports},
      volume = {11},
      pages = {1730},
      year = {2021},
      doi = {10.1038/s41598-021-81014-z},
      abstract = {Abstract In this work, the analytical research performed by the Raman Laser Spectrometer (RLS) team during the ExoFiT trial is presented. During this test, an emulator of the Rosalind Franklin rover was remotely operated at the Atacama Desert in a Mars-like sequence of scientific operations that ended with the collection and the analysis of two drilled cores. The in-situ Raman characterization of the samples was performed through a portable technology demonstrator of RLS (RAD1 system). The results were later complemented in the laboratory using a bench top RLS operation simulator and a X-Ray diffractometer (XRD). By simulating the operational and analytical constraints of the ExoMars mission, the two RLS representative instruments effectively disclosed the mineralogical composition of the drilled cores (k-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz, muscovite and rutile as main components), reaching the detection of minor phases (e.g., additional phyllosilicate and calcite) whose concentration was below the detection limit of XRD. Furthermore, Raman systems detected many organic functional groups (–C≡N, –NH 2 and C–(NO 2 )), suggesting the presence of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms in the samples. The Raman detection of organic material in the subsurface of a Martian analogue site presenting representative environmental conditions (high UV radiation, extreme aridity), supports the idea that the RLS could play a key role in the fulfilment of the ExoMars main mission objective: to search for signs of life on Mars.}
    }
  13. (2026). ESA: ExoMars Rover Rosalind Franklin. exploration.esa.int/web/mars/-/45084-exomars-rover
    BibTeX
    @misc{esaexomars,
      title = {ESA: ExoMars Rover Rosalind Franklin},
      organization = {exploration.esa.int},
      year = {2026},
      url = {https://exploration.esa.int/web/mars/-/45084-exomars-rover}
    }

Further reading