Microgravity and Orbital Environment
Low Earth orbit is a free-fall environment in which weight is replaced by a small residual acceleration, and in which a surface is exposed to atomic oxygen, hard vacuum, trapped and galactic ionizing radiation, hypervelocity particle flux and a thermal cycle once per orbit.
Reference orbit
Section titled “Reference orbit”| Quantity | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ISS inclination | 51.6 deg | [7] |
| ISS altitude band, assembly to assembly complete | 350 to 450 km | [7] |
| Orbital translational velocity | 7.7 km/s | [4] |
| Altitude band in which atomic oxygen dominates surface chemistry | 180 to 650 km | [5] |
| Ambient pressure measured on LDEF | 1e-4 to 1e-7 torr | [6] |
Residual acceleration
Section titled “Residual acceleration”Free fall is not zero acceleration. Experiment and life support equipment, crew activity, aerodynamic drag, gravity gradient and vehicle rotation all contribute, and the resulting field is treated as three components separated by frequency [1].
| Component | Band | Spatial behavior | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quasi-steady | below 0.01 Hz | Predictable at any point in the vehicle from a single measurement, the center of gravity location and rigid-body kinematics | [1] |
| Vibratory | 0.01 to 300 Hz | Must be measured near the point of interest; propagation through structure is not reliably predictable | [1] |
| Transient | non-periodic, content across the whole spectrum | Must be measured near the point of interest | [1] |
The quasi-steady band is bounded above by the lowest natural structural frequency of the vehicle, and its content varies over periods longer than a minute [1]. Vibratory content begins at that same structural frequency. Orbiter structural modes were identified at 3.5, 4.7, 5.1, 6.2 and 7.4 Hz, and the Spacelab module at 8.5 Hz [2].
Measured disturbance magnitudes:
| Event | Magnitude | Duration | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATV initial docking contact, 3 April 2008 | 12.9 mg | impulsive | [1] |
| ATV reboost | 21 min burn, delta-v just over 4 m/s | 21 min | [1] |
| Thruster firing transient | ~20 mg | minutes | [2] |
| Crew push-off or impact | ~50 mg | short | [2] |
| Payload-induced shock | 50 to 55 mg | tens of ms | [2] |
| Water pump at 10,000 rpm (166.7 Hz) | 4 to 5 mg | continuous | [2] |
| General equipment operation | 0.3 to 0.7 mg | continuous | [2] |
| Crew exercise | band 0.01 to 5 Hz | daily | [2] |
Reboost is not optional: the vehicle decelerates continuously under drag and the orbit decays [1]. A manipulator working at a berthing interface therefore does so against a base whose acceleration state includes both a periodic thrust-and-coast history and crew-driven transients at tens of milli-g.
Instrumentation defines what can be resolved. The Space Acceleration Measurement System uses an adjustable anti-alias cutoff between 25 and 400 Hz [1], the Microgravity Acceleration Measurement System HiRAP head reaches 100 Hz, and the JAXA Microgravity Measurement Apparatus in Kibo covers 10 to 300 Hz. SAMS-II remote triaxial sensor heads cover 0.01 Hz to beyond 300 Hz, extending to 400 Hz for transients, store 10 hours of data from five sensors at full bandwidth, and had returned 3.4 TB by Expedition 14 [3].
Neutral atmosphere and atomic oxygen
Section titled “Neutral atmosphere and atomic oxygen”Solar ultraviolet below 243 nm exceeds the 5.12 eV dissociation energy of O2, so the residual atmosphere at orbital altitude is predominantly atomic oxygen [5]. At 7.7 km/s each ram-facing surface meets that population at a collision energy of 4.5 eV and a number flux of 5.23e13 atoms/cm2/s at ISS altitude [4]. Erosion is therefore strongly directional: ram surfaces erode, wake surfaces do not.

Ram, wake, zenith and nadir directions relative to the velocity vector. Atomic oxygen erosion is confined to ram-facing surfaces because the 4.5 eV collision energy comes from the vehicle velocity rather than from thermal motion of the gas [5]. Source: [5]. Public domain (NASA).
Erosion yield Ey is the volume removed per incident atom. Flight values from MISSE 2 (3.95 years, 16 August 2001 to 30 July 2005, ram fluence 8.43e21 atoms/cm2) [5]:
| Material | Erosion yield (cm3/atom) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Polyoxymethylene | 9.14e-24 | [5] |
| Polycarbonate | 4.29e-24 | [4] |
| Epoxy, Hysol EA956 | 4.21e-24 | [4] |
| Mylar, PET | 3.01e-24 | [4] |
| Kapton H (reference material) | 3.00e-24 | [5] |
| PEEK | 2.99e-24 | [4] |
| Kapton HN | 2.81e-24 | [4] |
| ECTFE, Halar | 1.79e-24 | [4] |
| ETFE, Tefzel | 9.61e-25 | [4] |
| FEP Teflon | 2.00e-25 | [4] |
| PTFE | 1.42e-25 | [4] |
| DC 93-500 silicone | 3.81e-27 | [5] |
At the MISSE 2 fluence, a Kapton H surface loses about 25 micrometers [4]. Silicones survive because atomic oxygen converts the surface to a glassy silicate that passivates the layer below, at the cost of mud-tile cracking of that layer under strain [5]. Kapton H density of 1.4273 g/cm3 is the conversion used between measured mass loss and thickness loss.
The ground facility against orbit, on the same 39 polymers
Section titled “The ground facility against orbit, on the same 39 polymers”A radio-frequency plasma asher is the ground facility that stands in for orbit when a material has to be screened before flight, and the MISSE 2 PEACE experiment is the one case where the same 39 polymers were run in both [20]. The asher yield was higher than the space yield for every one of the 39, by a factor between 1.02 and 37.1 [20]. Both halves are measurements: the flight yields are mass loss on vacuum-dehydrated samples of stated density and exposed area at one common fluence, and that fluence, the 8.43e21 atoms/cm2 above, was itself determined from the mass loss of two Kapton H witness samples on the tray rather than taken from an atmospheric model. The asher yields are relative to Kapton H, with the samples in metal holders and the asher operated on air.
The direction is systematic and the size is not. Ground atomic oxygen testing overestimates erosion for every material in this set, but by a material-dependent factor, so the overestimate cannot be divided out: the fluoropolymers sit at 6.1 to 8.0, Kevlar at 24.0 and white Tedlar at 37.1 [20]. Two consequences follow for a designer. An asher screening pass is a conservative bound on erosion and nothing more. And two materials ranked against each other by asher yield can be ranked wrongly, because a 37-fold error and a 1.02-fold error appear in the same table [20]. Kevlar is a woven fabric rather than a film, and the source reads its position near the top of that list as weave geometry being what a ground facility fails to reproduce. That is an inference drawn from the ranking, not a separate experiment.
Mass loss is not a usable erosion metric for silicones at all. A silicone typically does not lose weight in atomic oxygen, because the surface converts to the glassy SiOx layer described above, so a mass-loss ranking places silicones among the most durable materials while that layer is shrinking and cracking to expose the substrate; nanomechanical surface hardness is used instead to set ground-facility equivalent fluences [20]. What changes optically is measurable. An uncovered DC 93-500 silicone sample on the MISSE 2 ram tray went from a solar absorptance of 0.005 before flight to 0.033 to 0.037 after four years [5], a factor of about seven, with total reflectance barely changed and the surface crazed into mud tiles.
Ram fluence scales with mission duration and solar activity: MISSE 4 accumulated 2.15e21 atoms/cm2 in 1.04 years and MISSE 8 accumulated 4.62e21 atoms/cm2 in 2.14 years [5]. On LDEF, inorganic coatings including aluminum, nickel and SiO2 protected T300/934 graphite epoxy from atomic oxygen with negligible mass penalty [6]. MISSE 2 samples also accumulated 1400 equivalent sun hours of solar exposure, and erosion yield for several polymers rose with combined solar exposure and temperature rather than with atomic oxygen fluence alone [5].

Erosion yield of FEP Teflon against accumulated solar exposure in equivalent sun hours, across several flight experiments. Yield rises with solar exposure, so an atomic oxygen fluence alone does not predict thickness loss for this material. Source: [5]. Public domain (NASA).
Thermal cycling
Section titled “Thermal cycling”An orbiting structure passes through eclipse roughly every 90 minutes [6]. LDEF accumulated about 34,000 thermal cycles in 5.8 years, over a range of -20 to 160 F (about -29 to 71 C) with a +/-20 F band on those limits [6]. The recorded failure modes were microcracking of composites and delamination of some dielectric and metallic coatings; the aluminized graphite-epoxy noted above survived the full cycle count without coating delamination. Cycling acts synergistically with atomic oxygen, ultraviolet, vacuum and contamination rather than independently.
Heat rejection is radiative because there is no convecting medium. The ISS US On-Orbit Segment rejects heat through the External Active Thermal Control System, two independent mechanically pumped single-phase liquid ammonia loops, each serving three radiators of eight panels, with each radiator carrying two flow paths [16]. Radiator orientation is controlled by the Thermal Radiator Rotary Joint, either parked at a fixed angle or in Autotrack, which adjusts the angle to maximize heat rejection against the moving sink direction. A robot on the outside of such a vehicle has the same constraint: heat generated in an actuator leaves only by conduction to a radiating surface.
Ionizing radiation
Section titled “Ionizing radiation”Total dose in a 51.6 deg, 400 km orbit originates primarily in the trapped belts, with one solar particle event assumed to occur per mission and add to it [13]. Design limits for the LEO-ISS orbit give a daily integral trapped proton fluence of 1.66e8 protons/cm2 above 0.1 MeV and 5.40e7 protons/cm2 above 0.5 MeV, external to the vehicle. LDEF returned an integrated trapped electron and proton dose of 2.5e5 rad at the vehicle ends against less than 10 rad from cosmic rays over the same 5.8 years [6].
Single event effects, not total dose, set the avionics problem in LEO. ISS screens assembled articles rather than de-lidded parts, in 200 MeV proton beams: protons of 200 to 500 MeV pass through packages, boards and even box enclosures at nearly full energy, and roughly one in 289,000 of them strikes a nucleus inside a device and makes the short-range, high-LET reaction products that cause the upsets [10]. Heavy ion testing runs at linear energy transfer between 60 and 100 MeV cm2/mg at beam energies near 12 MeV/nucleon, and devices sensitive to single event latchup are screened against an LET threshold of 36 MeV cm2/mg [11]. Proton fluence for Orbiter avionics assessment was integrated over 10 to 200 MeV. Large solar energetic particle events deliver of order 2.5e7 protons/cm2 above 10 MeV [12].
Internal, or deep dielectric, charging is a separate mechanism from surface charging. Electrons near 100 keV penetrate 3 mils of aluminum and those near 1 MeV penetrate 80 mils, depositing charge in dielectrics behind the outer shell [9]. The design threshold derived from CRRES data is 2e10 electrons/cm2 accumulated over 10 hours, equivalent to an average flux of 5e5 electrons/cm2/s.
Plasma and surface charging
Section titled “Plasma and surface charging”The ionosphere at ISS altitude has an electron density near 1e11 m-3 and an electron temperature near 990 K, measured simultaneously by the wide and narrow Langmuir probes of the Floating Potential Measurement Unit [8]. Those instruments cover 1e9 to 5e12 m-3 and 500 to 3000 K, with the floating potential probe spanning -180 to +180 V.
Two mechanisms drive the ISS structure negative. The 160 V photovoltaic array strings collect electrons at their exposed high-potential ends, and motion across the geomagnetic field induces a potential of about -10 V on the pressurized truss with a 30 V variation tip to tip across the arrays [7]. Structure potential is clamped by two plasma contactor units emitting below 0.1 A nominally, with a maximum observed discharge current of 100 mA per orbit. With the contactors off, the largest floating potential recorded by the Floating Potential Probe in 2001 was -23 V, at eclipse exit; the effective ion collection area of the ISS structure, the term that sets the electron loss balance, is 35 m2; and above about 160 V, snapover raises the conductivity of exposed array surfaces and increases collection [7].
Charging matters for robotics because an EVA suit, a grapple fixture or a manipulator end effector making first contact with a differently charged surface completes a circuit that was previously open.
Meteoroids and orbital debris
Section titled “Meteoroids and orbital debris”The meteoroid environment model MEM 3 covers particle masses from 1e-6 to 10 g, the range able to damage a spacecraft, and gives an average impact speed in low Earth orbit of 19 km/s [14]. Particles below 1e-6 g are assigned a density of 2 g/cm3. Showers contribute about 1 percent of total flux at the 1 microgram limit and less than 10 percent for particles below 0.5 cm, so the sporadic background dominates design [14].
LDEF recorded 34,336 micrometeoroid and debris impacts over 5.8 years [6]; the comparison of MEM against that record works from craters with lip diameters above 1000 microns, a limiting crater diameter of 750 microns [15]. ISS radiators carry MMOD strikes on all panels, and to date no strike has produced a leak in a radiator flow path [16]. Impacts are not uniformly distributed in time; the LDEF record showed them arriving in temporal bursts [6].
Flux depends on orientation as strongly as atomic oxygen does. A manipulator parked in one attitude for months accumulates a different exposure on each face.
Vacuum tribology
Section titled “Vacuum tribology”At 1e-4 to 1e-7 torr [6] there is no adsorbed water or oxide-replenishing atmosphere on a freshly exposed metal surface, and boundary lubrication must be supplied by a fluid that does not evaporate. Vapor pressure therefore sets the choice of lubricant before viscosity does [17].
Friction against ambient pressure is not monotonic, so a single vacuum figure does not describe a mechanism that sees a range of pressures. AISI 52100 steel sliding on itself gives a friction coefficient of 0.45 in laboratory air at 760 mm Hg, falls to about 0.2 between 1e-1 and 1e-2 mm Hg, and rises again to 0.375 at 5e-7 mm Hg, all measured on a 3/16 in radius hemispherical rider against a 2.5 in rotating disk at 1000 g load, 390 ft/min and room temperature [18]. The rise at the low end is the residual oxygen supply becoming too thin to re-oxidize metal transferred to the rider, and the whole curve sits six to eight orders of magnitude above the roughly 1e-14 mm Hg the same authors give for space.
Below the oxide the contact welds. Matched copper single crystals contacted at 1e-11 torr under a 50 g load with a 10 second dwell give an adhesion coefficient, breakaway force divided by applied load, of 1.02 before any sliding, and after sliding 0.735 cm at 0.001 cm/s the matched (100) pair exceeds 130 against 10.5 for the matched (111) pair [19]. The specimens are 99.999 percent metals cleaned in place by argon ion bombardment and the upper values are the limit of the apparatus rather than measurements, so the set bounds what a plated, machined and handled surface can do rather than predicting it. The ratio between the static and post-sliding values is why a fretting interface is treated as the cold welding risk in an orbital mechanism and a static clamped one is not.
Flight bears that distinction out. A French experiment on LDEF held aluminum, copper, titanium, stainless steel, copper beryllium, silver alloy and palladium washer pairs in static loaded contact at 25 to 135 MPa under Belleville springs for 69 months in low Earth orbit [21], with no sliding motion. Post-flight metallurgical examination of every flight and control pair found no cold welding event, and the ground controls held under vacuum for the same 69 months found none either; the experimenters attribute the null result to the oxide never being removed, because nothing slid [21]. The same report’s review of prior on-orbit experience found no documented significant cold welding failure on a US spacecraft, every reported seizure tracing to vibration-driven fretting or to galling after loss of lubricant. That review is a literature survey rather than a measurement.
| Lubricant | Vapor pressure at 150 C (Pa) | Kinematic viscosity at 40 / 100 C (cSt) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFPAE 815Z | 3.5e-6 | not stated | [17] |
| Trisilahydrocarbon 2-94-96 | 3.1e-5 | 133 / 20 | [17] |
| Pentasilahydrocarbon MJD990405 | 1.9e-5 | 206 / 31 | [17] |
| Multiply alkylated cyclopentane, Pennzane P2001A | 2.3e-3 | 108 / 15 | [17] |
Extrapolated to 25 C, the trisilahydrocarbon sits at 1.1e-8 Pa and pentasilahydrocarbon MJD991029 at 3.0e-12 Pa [17]. Film thickness under Hertzian contact depends on the pressure-viscosity coefficient, measured at 16 and 11 GPa-1 at 21 and 40 C for 2-94-96 against 11 and 8.5 GPa-1 for Pennzane P2001A.
Wear testing is run in vacuum because the result changes with ambient chemistry. Spiral orbit tribometer runs at below 1.3e-6 Pa, 200 rpm, 23 C, 1.5 GPa mean Hertzian stress and a 50 microgram oil charge per ball take a friction coefficient of 0.28 as the failure criterion [17]. In a reciprocating tribometer at 250 N, 0.7 GPa peak Hertzian stress, 6 Hz and 100 C, a tetrasilahydrocarbon produced a 0.71 mm2 wear scar against 1.02 mm2 for Pennzane 2001A. A bearing test at 1e-5 Pa, 600 rpm, 89 N axial load, 75 C and 20 mg free oil ran about 1000 hours on a pentasilahydrocarbon without measurable degradation.
Lubricated hardware returned from orbit
Section titled “Lubricated hardware returned from orbit”One set of lubricated hardware has come back. LDEF carried Castrol Braycote 601, a PTFE filled perfluoropolyether grease, on trailing edge drive shafts, ultraviolet exposed with negligible atomic oxygen [21]. The returned grease had a lower base oil viscosity than its control, read as ultraviolet chain scission of the polyether; infrared showed no new carbonyl and therefore no oxidation, but new peaks at 1100 to 1400 wavenumbers suggest the PTFE filler itself degraded, and new DSC endotherms appeared near 106 C and 211 C, the second unexplained. The grease had darkened to black and the cause was not identified [21].
Bonded dry film did worse than either. Everlube 620, a heat-cured MoS2 film in a proprietary organic binder, was gone after the same 69 months on the same trailing edge: only traces of MoS2 remained in the machining grooves, too little to test, the binder having been decomposed by ultraviolet and evaporated [21]. That is the one clear lubricant loss on LDEF and it happened where atomic oxygen fluence was negligible. Tungsten disulfide dry film on the grapple shafts, by contrast, was intact with no discernible difference between ram and trailing surfaces, but no surface analysis and no friction test was run on it, so it is a survival observation and not a tribological result.
A friction number did survive. DuPont Vespel SP-21, graphite filled polyimide, exposed on a trailing edge tray for 69 months, returned a coefficient of friction unchanged from its control at about 0.15 after run-in, over 10,000 cycles against two unflown controls [21]. The friction test was run on the ground in laboratory air, so the 0.15 carries the same room-temperature-air caveat as any bench figure and is not a vacuum value; what the flight establishes is that 69 months of orbital ultraviolet and vacuum did not change it [21].
References
- McPherson, K., Kelly, E. and Keller, J. (2009). Acceleration Environment of the International Space Station. NASA, 20120012936. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{mcpherson2009acceleration, title = {Acceleration Environment of the International Space Station}, author = {McPherson, Kevin and Kelly, Eric and Keller, Jennifer}, year = {2009}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20120012936}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20120012936}, booktitle = {47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition}, doi = {10.2514/6.2009-957} } - DeLombard, R., McPherson, K., Hrovat, K., Moskowitz, M., Rogers, M. J. B. and Reckart, T. (1997). Microgravity Environment Description Handbook. NASA, NASA-TM-107486. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{delombard1997microgravity, title = {Microgravity Environment Description Handbook}, author = {DeLombard, Richard and McPherson, Kevin and Hrovat, Kenneth and Moskowitz, Milton and Rogers, Melissa J. B. and Reckart, Timothy}, year = {1997}, institution = {NASA}, number = {NASA-TM-107486}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970022250} } - Foster, W. (2009). Space Acceleration Measurement System-II. NASA, 20090014818. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{foster2009space, title = {Space Acceleration Measurement System-II}, author = {Foster, William}, year = {2009}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20090014818}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20090014818} } - deGroh, K. K., Banks, B. A., McCarthy, C. E., Rucker, R. N., Roberts, L. M. and Berger, L. A. (2006). MISSE PEACE Polymers Atomic Oxygen Erosion Results. NASA, NASA/TM-2006-214482. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{degroh2006misse, title = {MISSE PEACE Polymers Atomic Oxygen Erosion Results}, author = {deGroh, Kim K. and Banks, Bruce A. and McCarthy, Catherine E. and Rucker, Rochelle N. and Roberts, Lily M. and Berger, Lauren A.}, year = {2006}, institution = {NASA}, number = {NASA/TM-2006-214482}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20070002707}, booktitle = {2006 MISSE Post-Retrieval Conference}, address = {Orlando, FL} } - de Groh, K. K. and Banks, B. A. (2019). Atomic Oxygen Erosion Data from the MISSE 2-8 Missions. NASA, 20190025445. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{degroh2019atomic, title = {Atomic Oxygen Erosion Data from the MISSE 2-8 Missions}, author = {de Groh, Kim K. and Banks, Bruce A.}, year = {2019}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20190025445}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190025445} } - Stein, B. A. (1992). An interim overview of LDEF materials findings. NASA, NASA-TM-107664. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{stein1992interim, title = {An interim overview of LDEF materials findings}, author = {Stein, Brad A.}, year = {1992}, institution = {NASA}, number = {NASA-TM-107664}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930009140} } - Barsamian, H., Mikatarian, R., Alred, J., Minow, J. and Koontz, S. (2004). ISS Plasma Interaction: Measurements and Modeling. NASA, 20040111048. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{barsamian2004iss, title = {ISS Plasma Interaction: Measurements and Modeling}, author = {Barsamian, H. and Mikatarian, R. and Alred, J. and Minow, J. and Koontz, S.}, year = {2004}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20040111048}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040111048}, booktitle = {8th Spacecraft Charging Technology Conference} } - Wright, K. H. J., Swenson, C., Thompson, D., Barjatya, A., Koontz, S. L., Schneider, T., Vaughn, J., Minow, J., Craven, P., Coffey, V., Parker, L. and Bui, T. (2007). Initial Results from the Floating Potential Measurement Unit aboard the International Space Station. NASA, 20070032723. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{wright2007initial, title = {Initial Results from the Floating Potential Measurement Unit aboard the International Space Station}, author = {Wright, Kenneth H., Jr. and Swenson, Charles and Thompson, Don and Barjatya, Aroh and Koontz, Steven L. and Schneider, Todd and Vaughn, Jason and Minow, Joseph and Craven, Paul and Coffey, Victoria and Parker, Linda and Bui, Them}, year = {2007}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20070032723}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20070032723}, booktitle = {10th Spacecraft Charging and Technology Conference}, address = {Biarritz} } - Whittlesey, A. and Garrett, H. B. (1996). NASA's Technical Handbook for Avoiding On-Orbit ESD Anomalies Due to Internal Charging Effects. NASA, 20000055759. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{whittlesey1996nasa, title = {NASA's Technical Handbook for Avoiding On-Orbit ESD Anomalies Due to Internal Charging Effects}, author = {Whittlesey, Albert and Garrett, Henry B.}, year = {1996}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20000055759}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20000055759} } - Koontz, S. L., Suggs, R. M., Alred, J. W., Worthy, E. S., Boeder, P., Steagall, C. A., Hartman, W. A., Gingras, B. D. and Schmidl, W. D. (2018). The International Space Station Space Radiation Environment: Avionics Systems Performance in Low-Earth Orbit Single Event Effects (SEE) Environments, ICES-2018-69. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{koontz2018international, title = {The International Space Station Space Radiation Environment: Avionics Systems Performance in Low-Earth Orbit Single Event Effects (SEE) Environments}, author = {Koontz, Steven L. and Suggs, Robert M. and Alred, John W. and Worthy, Erica S. and Boeder, Paul and Steagall, Courtney A. and Hartman, William A. and Gingras, Benjamin D. and Schmidl, William D.}, year = {2018}, booktitle = {48th International Conference on Environmental Systems}, address = {Albuquerque, NM}, number = {ICES-2018-69}, url = {https://hdl.handle.net/2346/74075} } - Reddell, B. D. (1999). Orbiter Avionics Radiation Handbook. NASA, 20180002644. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{reddell1999orbiter, title = {Orbiter Avionics Radiation Handbook}, author = {Reddell, Brandon D.}, year = {1999}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20180002644}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180002644} } - Adams, J. H. J. (1988). Current models of the intensely ionizing particle environment in space. NASA, 19890019087. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{adams1988current, title = {Current models of the intensely ionizing particle environment in space}, author = {Adams, James H., Jr.}, year = {1988}, institution = {NASA}, number = {19890019087}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890019087} } - NASA. (2020). Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE), Revision G. NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{nasa2019cross, title = {Cross-Program Design Specification for Natural Environments (DSNE), Revision G}, author = {NASA}, year = {2020}, institution = {NASA Marshall Space Flight Center}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200000867} } - Moorhead, A. V. (2020). NASA Meteoroid Engineering Model (MEM) Version 3. NASA, NASA/TM-2020-220555. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{moorhead2020nasa, title = {NASA Meteoroid Engineering Model (MEM) Version 3}, author = {Moorhead, A. V.}, year = {2020}, institution = {NASA}, number = {NASA/TM-2020-220555}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200000563} } - Ehlert, S., Moorhead, A. and Cooke, W. J. (2017). A Comparison of Results From NASA's Meteoroid Engineering Model to the LDEF Cratering Record, 20170004455. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{ehlert2017comparison, title = {A Comparison of Results From NASA's Meteoroid Engineering Model to the LDEF Cratering Record}, author = {Ehlert, S. and Moorhead, A. and Cooke, W. J.}, year = {2017}, booktitle = {7th European Conference on Space Debris}, address = {Darmstadt}, organization = {ESA Space Debris Office}, number = {20170004455}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170004455} } - Rodriguez, A. and Morton, R. (2025). ISS Radiator Face Sheet Anomaly Investigation and Return to Function. NASA, 20260002946. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{rodriguez2025iss, title = {ISS Radiator Face Sheet Anomaly Investigation and Return to Function}, author = {Rodriguez, Aaron and Morton, Richard}, year = {2025}, institution = {NASA}, number = {20260002946}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20260002946}, booktitle = {55th International Conference on Environmental Systems}, doi = {10.32865/2346/108957} } - Jones, W. R. J., Jansen, M. J., Gschwender, L. J., Snyder, C. E. J., Sharma, S. K., Predmore, R. E. and Dube, M. J. (2001). The Tribological Properties of Several Silahydrocarbons for Use in Space Mechanisms. NASA, NASA/TM-2001-211196. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{jones2001tribological, title = {The Tribological Properties of Several Silahydrocarbons for Use in Space Mechanisms}, author = {Jones, W. R., Jr. and Jansen, M. J. and Gschwender, L. J. and Snyder, C. E., Jr. and Sharma, S. K. and Predmore, R. E. and Dube, M. J.}, year = {2001}, institution = {NASA}, number = {NASA/TM-2001-211196}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20020014361}, booktitle = {Journal of Synthetic Lubrication}, address = {Liege}, doi = {10.1002/jsl.3000200404}, volume = {20}, pages = {303-315} } - Buckley, D. H., Swikert, M. and Johnson, R. L. (1962). Friction, Wear, and Evaporation Rates of Various Materials in Vacuum to 1e-7 mm Hg. ASLE Transactions. Source
BibTeX
@article{buckley1962friction, title = {Friction, Wear, and Evaporation Rates of Various Materials in Vacuum to 1e-7 mm Hg}, author = {Buckley, Donald H. and Swikert, Max and Johnson, Robert L.}, journal = {ASLE Transactions}, volume = {5}, pages = {8--23}, year = {1962}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150020881} } - Buckley, D. H. (1968). Influence of Crystal Structure, Orientation, and Solubility on Adhesion and Sliding Friction of Metal Single Crystals in Vacuum. NASA Lewis Research Center, NASA TN D-4954. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{buckley1968influence, title = {Influence of Crystal Structure, Orientation, and Solubility on Adhesion and Sliding Friction of Metal Single Crystals in Vacuum}, author = {Buckley, Donald H.}, institution = {NASA Lewis Research Center}, number = {NASA TN D-4954}, year = {1968}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19680011757} } - deGroh, K. K., Banks, B. A., Dever, J. A., Jaworske, D. A., Miller, S. K., Sechkar, E. A. and Panko, S. R. (2008). NASA Glenn Research Center's Materials International Space Station Experiments (MISSE 1-7). NASA, NASA/TM-2008-215482. Source
BibTeX
@inproceedings{degroh2008nasa, title = {NASA Glenn Research Center's Materials International Space Station Experiments (MISSE 1-7)}, author = {deGroh, Kim K. and Banks, Bruce a. and Dever, Joyce A. and Jaworske, Donald A. and Miller, Sharon K. and Sechkar, Edward A. and Panko, Scott R.}, year = {2008}, institution = {NASA}, number = {NASA/TM-2008-215482}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20090005995}, booktitle = {International Symposium on SM/MPAC and SEED Experiments}, address = {Tsukuba} } - Dursch, H. W., Spear, W. S., Miller, E. A., Bohnhoff-Hlavacek, G. L. and Edelman, J. (1992). Analysis of systems hardware flown on LDEF. Results of the systems special investigation group. Legacy CDMS, 19920022433. Source
BibTeX
@techreport{dursch2019analysis, title = {Analysis of systems hardware flown on LDEF. Results of the systems special investigation group}, author = {Dursch, Harry W. and Spear, W. Steve and Miller, Emmett A. and Bohnhoff-Hlavacek, Gail L. and Edelman, Joel}, year = {1992}, institution = {Legacy CDMS}, number = {19920022433}, url = {https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19920022433} }